you actually took the effort to find those little arrows? Depressing.
Do you really want to shut down reddit and let all the shit spill onto the rest of the internet?
[QUOTE=Van-man;37760839]And?
They're just enforcing the negative Reddit stereotype with such logo.[/QUOTE]
grr stop liking things
What the hell is revenge porn?
[QUOTE=NikoChekhov;37764769]What the hell is revenge porn?[/QUOTE]
[quote]In recent years a genre of websites dedicated to sharing humiliating pictures of women – and occasionally men – has cropped up, known as "revenge porn" sites. The idea is that vengeful people can post humiliating, sexual pictures of former partners, photos often clearly intended for personal use only, if they were taken with consent at all.[/quote]
[QUOTE=UnknownDude;37764219]Hating Reddit as a whole because of some of the subs is ignorant.
Reddit's userbase is huge. That coupled with the generally unrestricted ability to create your own forums about anything, means that there are good subs (e.g. the SWF "porn" subs),
awful subs (e.g. r/atheism and r/gaming) and subs that need to be shut down (r/creepshots and all the other fucked up subs). Remember when Facepunch had custom forums? We actually had lolicon and shotacon forums.[/QUOTE]
why do they have to call them porn subs though.
i dont get it cant you just call it nice city pictures or nice nature pictures or something.
is it a reddit thing where everything has to be related to sex or porn.
[QUOTE=ShazzyFreak0;37765615]is it a reddit thing where everything has to be related to sex or porn.[/QUOTE]
it's not a reddit thing, it's more of a "middle-class white male in STEM courses with a notch against the opposite gender" kind of thing
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;37763316]It wasn't child porn, though. It was just drawn child porn and shots of kids in swimsuits and stuff, literally no children were being abused.
I think it was creepy, yes, but it certainly wasn't child porn.[/QUOTE]
fp's resident paedophile here to remind everyone that as long as they have clothes on its not porn
[QUOTE=Kopimi;37766777]fp's resident paedophile here to remind everyone that as long as they have clothes on its not porn[/QUOTE]
ok so what if they're having sex while clothed
[QUOTE=Taggart;37766801]ok so what if they're having sex while clothed[/QUOTE]
I can't tell if you're joking along or taking my post seriously
Man there are some seriously creepy and desperate people out there. Pretty disturbing.
[QUOTE=Kopimi;37766777]fp's resident paedophile here to remind everyone that as long as they have clothes on its not porn[/QUOTE]
I never said that
Child porn has a very strict definition in which children are usually abused
I'm not defending anyone, I was just saying that it wasn't as bad as the media was reporting it to be
[QUOTE=MaxOfS2D;37766522]it's not a reddit thing, it's more of a "middle-class white male in STEM courses with a notch against the opposite gender" kind of thing[/QUOTE]
they make stem majors look so bad. :(
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;37767358]I never said that
Child porn has a very strict definition in which children are abused
I'm not defending anyone, I was just saying that it wasn't as bad as the media was reporting it to be[/QUOTE]
to be fair
the media is shit so...
[SUB][SUB]and when I say shit I mean... imagine a giant bloody fatty stool[/SUB][/SUB]
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;37767358]I never said that
Child porn has a very strict definition in which children are abused
I'm not defending anyone, I was just saying that it wasn't as bad as the media was reporting it to be[/QUOTE]
no im p sure the definition of child porn isn't "pornographic images of children that are abused in the process" its just "pornographic images of children"
get help
[QUOTE=Kopimi;37768083]no im p sure the definition of child porn isn't "pornographic images of children that are abused in the process" its just "pornographic images of children"
get help[/QUOTE]
Legal definition;
[quote](8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
[/quote]
Dictionary definition
[quote]Child pornography refers to images or films (also known as child abuse images) and, in some cases, writings depicting sexually explicit activities involving a child.Abuse of the child occurs during the sexual acts which are recorded in the production of child pornography[/quote]
Do you even know what jailbait is
It sure doesn't sound like it
I find it funny how dori rates every single post I make in this thread dumb literally seconds after me posting it without ever actually making a counterargument
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;37768170]Legal definition;
Dictionary definition
Do you even know what jailbait is
It sure doesn't sound like it
I find it funny how dori rates every single post I make in this thread dumb literally seconds after me posting it without ever actually making a counterargument[/QUOTE]
are you serious like did you even read these definitions or did your child-induced erection distract you from reading the shit you posted
[quote][B]Child pornography refers to images or films (also known as child abuse images) and, in some cases, writings depicting sexually explicit activities involving a child[/B].Abuse of the child occurs during the sexual acts which are recorded in the production of child pornography[/quote]
[quote](8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
[B](A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; [/B]
(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.[/quote]
whether or not the child is actually abused during the production of the image is irrelevant, its still child pornography you mog
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;37768170]Legal definition;
Dictionary definition
Do you even know what jailbait is
It sure doesn't sound like it
I find it funny how dori rates every single post I make in this thread dumb literally seconds after me posting it without ever actually making a counterargument[/QUOTE]
hi my counterargument is that i rated you dumb because you didn't read the definitions you posted.
[QUOTE=Kopimi;37768273]are you serious like did you even read these definitions or did your child-induced erection distract you from reading the shit you posted
whether or not the child is actually abused during the production of the image is irrelevant, its still child pornography you mog[/QUOTE]
Did you even read the second part of that first quote you posted? It explicitly states that "Abuse of the child occurs during the sexual acts which are recorded in the production of child pornography".
[editline]23rd September 2012[/editline]
And stop acting like I'm a pedophile, that's like saying that all people that are against racism are minorities. It's childish.
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;37768466]Did you even read the second part of that first quote you posted? It explicitly states that "Abuse of the child occurs during the sexual acts which are recorded in the production of child pornography".
[editline]23rd September 2012[/editline]
And stop acting like I'm a pedophile, that's like saying that all people that are against racism are minorities. It's childish.[/QUOTE]
yes its a statement made in conjunction with the definition of paedophilia. it just so happens that in many cases children are abused in the production of child porn, that doesn't mean child porn is exclusive to cases in which a child is abused. i know this "reading" stuff might be difficult but your misinterpretation of a simple statement by a wikipedia article doesn't invalidate the legal definition of paedophilia. also no its not at all like calling people minorities for being against racism, you consistently take pro paedophilia stances and act like its normal to jerk off to lolicon lol, if you dont want to be accused of being a paedophile you should try hiding your underage porn preferences
[QUOTE=Ninja Duck;37760749]Land of the lonely.
[url]http://www.reddit.com/r/CreepShots/[/url][/QUOTE]
I don't understand how anyone could enjoy going there
I guess the same could be said for all of reddit
[QUOTE=Kopimi;37768507]yes its a statement made in conjunction with the definition of paedophilia. it just so happens that in many cases children are abused in the production of child porn, that doesn't mean child porn is exclusive to cases in which a child is abused. i know this "reading" stuff might be difficult but your misinterpretation of a simple statement by a wikipedia article doesn't invalidate the legal definition of paedophilia. also no its not at all like calling people minorities for being against racism, you consistently take pro paedophilia stances and act like its normal to jerk off to lolicon lol, if you dont want to be accused of being a paedophile you should try hiding your underage porn preferences[/QUOTE]
Again, with the accusations. I've never said that jerking it to loli was normal, only that it shouldn't be illegal. I don't know where you're getting the idea that I masturbate to that, because it's simply not true, and your argument would be a lot stronger if you would stop making such baseless accusations.
Things aren't only defined by the legal definition, and I'm saying that the definition I posted was the more common one. To the best of my knowledge (although I may be wrong), there wasn't any content other than people in swimsuits and the like posted, thus there was no child pornography posted in either a legal or a common usage definition.
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;37768662]Again, with the accusations. I've never said that jerking it to loli was normal, only that it shouldn't be illegal. I don't know where you're getting the idea that I masturbate to that, because it's simply not true, and your argument would be a lot stronger if you would stop making such baseless accusations.
Things aren't only defined by the legal definition, and I'm saying that the definition I posted was the more common one. To the best of my knowledge (although I may be wrong), there wasn't any content other than people in swimsuits and the like posted, thus there was no child pornography posted in either a legal or a common usage definition.[/QUOTE]
nobody cares about what you consider the common definition especially when your "common definition" is based on a blatant misrepresentation of a simple wikipedia quote. whether the child is abused or not is irrelevant, it's still pornography. if you secretly filmed two children having sex is not somehow not pornography because nobody was abused and forced into doing it? no, because thats [B]stupid[/B]. its porn either way so you can stop peddling this moronic idea that somehow it's no longer porn unless someone gets hurt
[editline]23rd September 2012[/editline]
what happened to me being on your ignore list dog?
This is why I don't buy the "but there's good subreddits!" thing, who cares? Their good entire sites, why bother with a subreddit when you can go to a dedicated forum for the subject?
[QUOTE=The Baconator;37768745]This is why I don't buy the "but there's good subreddits!" thing, who cares? Their good entire sites, why bother with a subreddit when you can go to a dedicated forum for the subject?[/QUOTE]
Because they're exactly the same thing? Because some people prefer the format? Because fucking free will?
[QUOTE=The Baconator;37768745]This is why I don't buy the "but there's good subreddits!" thing, who cares? Their good entire sites, why bother with a subreddit when you can go to a dedicated forum for the subject?[/QUOTE]
I'm not saying that you should use reddit, but the circlejerk that "OMG REDDIT IS BAD/LE MEMES/ATHEISM/ETC" is really unfounded and annoying.
the le meme wouldn't be as bad if they used the proper definitive articles
Honestly I used to feel indifferent towards reddit until I found out about the existence of what is essentially child pornographic subbredits and how the reddit admins basically had to be legally strong-armed into removing them.
[QUOTE=Boxbot219;37768921]Honestly I used to feel indifferent towards reddit until I found out about the existence of what is essentially child pornographic subbredits and how the reddit admins basically had to be legally strong-armed into removing them.[/QUOTE]
exactly, why give your patronage to a site run by people who have done so much to prevent deletion of child porn from their site?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.