• Anne Frank Diary "Too Pornographic" for Middle Schoolers.
    104 replies, posted
Kids already fuck and smoke in middle school
"Having a quick finger up before the train" - Anne Frank
[QUOTE=thisispain;40534570]what a terrible person he's confident in his opinion because its something he had great interest in fuckin jerk [/QUOTE] That would maybe stand if you weren't almost zealously confident in each and every opinion I have ever seen you to voice.
Anne Frank's vagina strikes trouble again I see.
I think in early middle school I was still at that point where I would be extremely uncomfortable around anything remotely lewd. I was a sheltered child. :U
I had no clue this was in Anne Frank's diary. As a matter of fact I don't have a god damn clue of what there is in this diary at all.
best holocaust erotica ever made
[QUOTE=Klammyxxl;40534770]i hate the times we're living in.[/QUOTE] The irony is, Anne Frank clearly knew this stuff at the same age in the 1940s as the kids today are forbidden to read.
[QUOTE=Paramud;40535103]You really shouldn't pull the "ARE U AN EXPERT????" card unless you yourself actually are an expert on the subject. [b]Also, "informedly" isn't even a word.[/b][/QUOTE] Uh... [url]http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/informedly[/url] Are you an expert????
I don't get why this is such a big deal. Most of those kids are going through puberty at that age anyway. Vaginas and penises aren't exactly some weird mystery that should be hidden from them.
Yeah, I completely ignore all the parts where her family was terrorized and murdered by Nazis and go straight to the parts where she describes her vagina.
[QUOTE=killerteacup;40534694]dude stop it you're actually being a bigger dick than anyone else is in this thread, no joke, calm down and stop going around with your stupid vendetta and derailing interesting threads like this. Noone cares who you don't like and I'm sure everyone here would rather have a think about these opinions then read about your problems with some user you've never even met in real life. This is not the first time I've seen you do it - can you please for the interest of everyone's enjoyment just stop being a child I'd really like to get this thread back on topic because it's a fact that Anne frank realised around 1944 the historical value of her diary. Around 1944 she heard a radio broadcast talking about the value of simple correspondence from a Dutch Minister who said: "History cannot be written on the basis of official decisions and documents alone. If our descendants are to understand fully what we as a nation have had to endure and overcome during these years, then what we really need are ordinary documents -- a diary, letters from a worker in Germany, a collection of sermons given by a parson or priest. Not until we succeed in bringing together vast quantities of this simple, everyday material will the picture of our struggle for freedom be painted in its full depth and glory." After this she began to realise its worth as a piece of historical evidence and began to supplement it and previous entries with additional information and edit the pseudonyms found in it. She did see its value as a piece of historical evidence and thus, while not originally having the intention of it being public, amended it later with the idea that eventually she would use the diary for these purposes, thus putting stuff in it that would not normally be put in her diary by her. "how the hell did she know how significant her diary was historically after she died" betrays ignorance about how history works - the most common things become the most important. People are pretty aware of this you know. So yeah sorry its not just some funny thing she wrote down expecting noone would see it, by the end of the war she knew full well that she intended it to be released[/QUOTE] You realize this is already derailment and not really original point of the thread either, right?
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;40536294]You realize this is already derailment and not really original point of the thread either, right?[/QUOTE] Just let it go, man.
[QUOTE=Joey90;40536107]Uh... [url]http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/informedly[/url] Are you an expert????[/QUOTE] Strange. I actually checked Wiktionary, and nothing came up.
[QUOTE=kaze4159;40534019]I don't know about you but by the 6th grade we already had sex-ed where they taught us most of this[/QUOTE] in my sex ed (which i didnt get til 9th-10th grade), we were taught abstinence only. likely, these "concerned mothers" are the same women responsible for my so-called "education"
I've no problem with an edited version, but for the right reasons If the father had some parts edited out for the publication, in respect to her own daughter's privacy, then that's fine. But if it's edited out for the factor of pure censorship or to make it "age appropriate," bull shit. [I]She was younger than these students when she wrote this[/I]
This is silly, I wasn't even in middle school when we read her diary. I think we were in grade 4 or 5
you know what my problem is with the diary of anne frank? in my class when we read it, people took it as a history lesson on the holocaust, which it is, but people who read it only cared about anne frank as a jew, not as a person. the outstanding quality of anne frank to them was she was jewish, when the takeaway should be instead that anne frank had absolutely no outstanding qualities.
I read 1984 in middle school. Man the boners had during class.
Wait until they read The Color Purple
The Handmaid's Tale was excellent Literotica.
Still no need to act like a Nazi about it.
seventh? don't you learn about this in biology or sex ed at like grade 5?
My middle school went over Anne Frank's diary entries but omitted this entire bit from it. Then again, this came from those school books, where they horribly maim and chop up all types of stories, from short to long alike, to shove them in there without much care for process. More concerned about fancy-ass backgrounds and all sorts of "DID YOU KNOW THIS IS A VERB?" facts on the sides.
This book was in our library in year 6 at school, I decided to read it and got to those parts, shit was awkward. I just skipped a lot of it though.
[QUOTE=killerteacup;40534694] So yeah sorry its not just some funny thing she wrote down expecting noone would see it, by the end of the war she knew full well that she intended it to be released[/QUOTE] i really don't understand why people seem to disagree more with this view even though there's evidence that Anne Frank went back and revised it. i don't know why she'd change all the names if she never intended for anyone to read it. Maybe she just had wacky nick-names for everyone but the evidence that she was affected by the radio broadcast about preservation makes a lot more sense than "she didn't intend for it to be public just because."
Wow, and I went to a private christian school and I even read this in 7th grade, people are silly.
Not this fucking shit again. I hate how society teaches us to hate sex and our bodies. Oh no! Someone is learning about their sexuality! We're not fucking amoeba's that reproduce asexually. We're sexual creatures and we need to stop pretending like we aren't. I always find it hilarious when they tell teenagers that they aren't supposed to have sex when their bodies are physically urging them to reproduce because that's what they're supposed to do! But what do our bodies know? They just come from thousands of years of evolution. We call people who aren't afraid of their sexualities "perverts" and shun them when all they're doing is what they're supposed to do. Those fucking Mongoloids who hate on people's sexualities should just Shrivel Up and get hit by Space Junk.
[QUOTE=Death_God;40534488]what are you stupid she wants to be a public journalist sure but do all journalists publish their private diaries fuck no how the hell did she know how significant her diary was historically after she died and why would a journalist put in stuff about her vagina for the public to read oh thats right because it [B]had no intention on being public[/B] oh and btw just because [B]you[/B] wouldn't write it in a diary doesnt mean anne frank wouldn't too saying that you'd supply 'additional information that you'd never write in a diary' is just opinion[/QUOTE] [quote]Frank's diary began as a private expression of her thoughts; she wrote several times that she would never allow anyone to read it. She candidly described her life, her family and companions, and their situation, while beginning to recognise her ambition to write fiction for publication. In March 1944, she heard a radio broadcast by Gerrit Bolkestein—a member of the Dutch government in exile—who said that when the war ended, he would create a public record of the Dutch people's oppression under German occupation.[50] [B]He mentioned the publication of letters and diaries, and Frank decided to submit her work when the time came[/B]. She began editing her writing, removing some sections and rewriting others, with a view to publication. Her original notebook was supplemented by additional notebooks and loose-leaf sheets of paper. She created pseudonyms for the members of the household and the helpers. The van Pels family became Hermann, Petronella, and Peter van Daan, and Fritz Pfeffer became Albert Düssell. In this edited version, she addressed each entry to "Kitty," a fictional character in Cissy van Marxveldt's Joop ter Heul novels that Anne enjoyed reading.[/quote]
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;40535598]That would maybe stand if you weren't almost zealously confident in each and every opinion I have ever seen you to voice.[/QUOTE] what-fucking-ever dude if you guys want to rate me dumb and insult me i dont really care, so far i havent seen anyone give any real rebuttal that pulls proof from her writings, no-one's said "OH but in this part she's like 'nah im not gonna release this, its private'" or anything this is just like 2007 all over again, except this time its not even half as entertaining
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.