Trayvon Martin AKA "NO LIMIT NIGGA" twitter revealed (152 Pages of content)
200 replies, posted
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;35348259]
where'd you get it, stormfront or freerepublic?
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
because the doublebananas tangent about unpunished crimes against white people makes me lean towards stormfront but then the casual sexism and racial codewords make me think freerepublic. I'm dying to find out which[/QUOTE]
seems like a collaboration between the two
It's obvious he isn't Martin, well the Martin we're talking about. Just LOOK at him. Only similarities is he's black.
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
And I think for these infographics that's all they need.
[QUOTE=Shadaez;35342734]Yes, lets post images created by white supremacists to try and prove a point.
The first one is complete bullshit if you take any time to look at it. Sure, there's some useful information in it but they're also trying to blame Trayvon, which means there's obviously some agenda behind it.
The second picture of Trayvon is fake and from what I've read is some other random person that was put out there by Stormfront.[/QUOTE]
But the picture used in media is him when he was 13, making him out to look like an innocent little child.
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;35346475]Extracting codine is an extremely lengthy and difficult process, if you're implying this kid can do it
Except do you take into account that it's SO open that maybe they're bullshitting. There's a certain discreet nature to drug dealing as it's kinda illegal.
Okay? You are the master as making vague incinuations. Still waiting for how that rap video has ANYTHING to do with what I said.
I WATCHED A SHOW ONCE
The worse he would make is lean. This is assuming we're moving past the fact that he gets "connects" and doesn't actually sell it himself.
Yeah ANYONE who has ever broken a law or shown disrespect for legal authority has to be a violent thug. I wonder if there is subtle racism here, or just one long dick sucking to authority. Which is it?
You are fucking terrible.
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
Then you are absolutely out of your fucking mind. He story has changed weekly, Martin's has not changed at all. Oh sorry, there's a possibility he sold weed, oops, guess that means he's a violent criminal.
No actually, it's something called lighting. And you can clearly make out his Hispanic features.
This image may convince the stupid and exceptionally racist, but there are zero sources for this, outlandish racism of the worse kind, a lot of the claims seem to contradict what has been said the following days, and the rest is just opinionated bias from an angry sheltered kid who's afraid of black people so posting this stuff on 4chan is his only outlet for expressing how oprressed he thinks he is as a white person.
Tell you what, produce YOUR OWN facts and opinions, then we'll talk.
Just want to point out, the one with Martin with his shirt up, isn't actually him.
And this image is guilty of the EXACT same fucking thing.
Here's the thing, they use images given to them. That picture was most likely given by their parents. And the Zimmerman picture was probably the only one they can dig up as it's public record. If you notice, they're not using[/QUOTE]
You're stupid. It's the same exact mug shot, except they photoshop it and lighten it.
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;35348259]hmm, let's check this out...
"[b]Fact: Treyvon did fuck Zimmerman up and Zimmerman pleaded for help, sadly none of the pussy neighbors he thinks he was protecting would even come outside when he screamed for help. Those men are pussies and deserve to be shamed. But no one is paying attention to that failure of society"[/b].
lol that sounds legit to me.
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
where'd you get it, stormfront or freerepublic?
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
because the doublebananas tangent about unpunished crimes against white people makes me lean towards stormfront but then the casual sexism and racial codewords make me think freerepublic. I'm dying to find out which[/QUOTE]
I didn't say that the infographic was all right. It has some informative points and then it has racial terms. The above portion is mostly correct.
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
[img]http://www.digitaljournal.com/img/5/9/2/8/1/2/i/1/1/0/p-large/tr1.jpg[/img]
Here's a verified picture of Trayvon Martin. Compare it to the photo spread throughout media, and he doesn't look like a little innocent kid. It's media, people.
[QUOTE=The First 11'er;35342432]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/WJQkA.gif[/t]
And another:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/APt0X.jpg[/IMG]
I feel that first of all, using the mug shot of Zimmerman compared to a picture taken of Trayvon when was 13 years old clearly gives out that they want Zimmerman to look bad and Trayvon look good. Look at the above image.[/QUOTE]
Your outlook is politically\media'fiable incorrect. But in reality it's very true. Trayvon was a wannabe gangster, in my opinion i think trayvon reached in his pocket and pretended to pull a peice resulting in zimmerman firing at him.
Intimidation and fear is what caused his death, the "thug" attitude.
[QUOTE=The First 11'er;35348711]But the picture used in media is him when he was 13, making him out to look like an innocent little child.[/quote]
Uh, that was the photo given to them. Now they are using other photos. The one with his gold dental crowns are the common one they use now.
[quote]You're stupid. It's the same exact mug shot, except they photoshop it and lighten it.[/quote]
If it was the exact same mug shot, then it wouldn't have varying sizes, shapes and angles. Obvious it's taken from several places.
Besides, as I look at it, the image varies.
This is from ABC news, which your stupid little infographic claims is this anti-white station
[img]http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/files/2012/03/Trayvon-Martin-George-Zimmerman-1.jpg[/img]
Oh would you look at that.
[quote]I didn't say that the infographic was all right. It has some informative points and then it has racial terms. The above portion is mostly correct.[/QUOTE]
No it didn't lol
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=SilverKnight;35348791]Your outlook is politically\media'fiable incorrect. But in reality it's very true. Trayvon was a wannabe gangster, in my opinion i think trayvon reached in his pocket and pretended to pull a peice resulting in zimmerman firing at him.
Intimidation and fear is what caused his death, the "thug" attitude.[/QUOTE]
This is a post of someone who JUST heard about this case probably a good 20 minutes ago.
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=The First 11'er;35348711]
[img]http://www.digitaljournal.com/img/5/9/2/8/1/2/i/1/1/0/p-large/tr1.jpg[/img]
Here's a verified picture of Trayvon Martin. Compare it to the photo spread throughout media, and he doesn't look like a little innocent kid. It's media, people.[/QUOTE]
I've seen the one of the left more than any. The one on the right is new to me.
I've gone through all the major media outlets, all their current articles are using the photo on the left.
You are terrible.
[QUOTE=thisispain;35336358]
and why do keep anti-semites around on FP again?[/QUOTE]
Why do we keep people who listen to fox news and are politically correct over morally correct around on FP again?
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;35348610]It's obvious he isn't Martin, well the Martin we're talking about. Just LOOK at him. Only similarities is he's black.
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
And I think for these infographics that's all they need.[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure about the images in the first graphic (it's dripping with hate and such, I don't want to see it anymore... editing Martin's mom to have money earrings and in her chest is just stupid), but the second one all they did was apparently look up Trayvon Martin and found another person by that name in Georgia and said this was the REAL image the mainstream media didn't want you to see. Without realizing of course, it's two completely different people.
All the while moralizing about how the media is manipulating information by presenting pictures in a certain way to advance a liberal/race crusade/anti-gun etc agenda, they end up providing an incorrect image that people apparently ran away with in the world of email forwards and facebook shares.
[QUOTE=SilverKnight;35348871]Why do we keep people who listen to fox news and are politically correct over morally correct?[/QUOTE]
What are you talking about?
[QUOTE=The First 11'er;35348711]You're stupid. It's the same exact mug shot, except they photoshop it and lighten it.[/QUOTE]
Bear in mind that those pictures were taken by two different cameras in two different environments, so you're bound to see a difference in lighting. So it's not them "lighting it up".
Otherwise, post a side-by-side comparison of the mugshots that were different.
EDIT:
I have seen the different pictures, but I still think that your assumption is absurd. Numerous TVs have the ability to alter color quality, and they don't have the same color quality. Try tweaking the contrast and saturation in the option menu.
[QUOTE=The First 11'er;35348711]
[img]http://www.digitaljournal.com/img/5/9/2/8/1/2/i/1/1/0/p-large/tr1.jpg[/img]
Here's a verified picture of Trayvon Martin. Compare it to the photo spread throughout media, and he doesn't look like a little innocent kid. It's media, people.[/QUOTE]
doesn't look like a little innocent kid?
the fuck kind of purple drank are you drinking, he still looks like an innocent kid, just with gold teeth.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;35348794]Uh, that was the photo given to them. Now they are using other photos. The one with his gold dental crowns are the common one they use now.
If it was the exact same mug shot, then it wouldn't have varying sizes, shapes and angles. Obvious it's taken from several places.
Besides, as I look at it, the image varies.
This is from ABC news, which your stupid little infographic claims is this anti-white station
[img]http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/files/2012/03/Trayvon-Martin-George-Zimmerman-1.jpg[/img]
Oh would you look at that.
No it didn't lol
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
This is a post of someone who JUST heard about this case probably a good 20 minutes ago.
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
I've seen the one of the left more than any. The one on the right is new to me.
I've gone through all the major media outlets, all their current articles are using the photo on the left.
You are terrible.[/QUOTE]
You are completely and utterly fucking dumb.
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=CoolKingKaso;35348948]Bear in mind that those pictures were taken by two different cameras in two different environments, so you're bound to see a difference in lighting. So it's not them "lighting it up".
Otherwise, post a side-by-side comparison of the mugshots that were different.
EDIT:
I have seen the different pictures, but I still think that your assumption is absurd. Numerous TVs have the ability to alter color quality, and they don't have the same color quality. Try tweaking the contrast and saturation in the option menu.[/QUOTE]
All those picture comparisons are taken straight from articles.
[QUOTE=thisispain;35348986]doesn't look like a little innocent kid?
the fuck kind of purple drank are you drinking, he still looks like an innocent kid, just with [B]gold teeth[/B].[/QUOTE]
I think that's just the lighting.
[QUOTE=The First 11'er;35349031]All those picture comparisons are taken straight from articles.[/QUOTE]
Have you also looked at the Trayvon Martin pictures too? Were they also lit up?
[QUOTE=The First 11'er;35349031]You are completely and utterly fucking dumb.[/quote]
I'm glad we've had this debate.
[quote]All those picture comparisons are taken straight from articles.[/QUOTE]
How do you know? Did you make the image?
[editline]29th March 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=MegaChalupa;35349046]I think that's just the lighting.[/QUOTE]
no he has gold crowns, but they're probably just dental.
Let's go back to the first fight Trayvon had in school too and use it against him
Because it totally fucking matters
[QUOTE=The First 11'er;35348711][img]http://www.digitaljournal.com/img/5/9/2/8/1/2/i/1/1/0/p-large/tr1.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
I watch CNN quite a bit, and have seen the picture on the right run on the news, usually in a sort of slideshow with a few other pictures of Treyvon. He doesn't look different than most pictures in these two, it's just an unflattering picture. Here's an example of what I mean-
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/43321825/comparison.jpg[/img]
Two pictures of me- although I'm a wimpy white guy by default and it's hard to pass as threatening, you can see the difference that a slightly different camera angle, style of dress, and facial expression can have on your perception of who a person might be.
Even if Treyvon looked older in real life than pictures suggest, it doesn't excuse Zimmerman for fallowing him in his truck, carrying a gun at his self-appointed neighborhood watch position, and pulling it on an unarmed teen. Even if Treyvon was 35 and had gang tattoos, Zimmerman's rationale for following him was that there were "several break-ins recently by young black males." So what? You're prepared to shoot a person for stealing your stereo? Give me a break. Zimmerman should have stayed put and let the police handle the situation.
nice face
you are balding
[QUOTE=Vasili;35352429]you are balding[/QUOTE]
No, it's just my terrible, terrible haircut.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;35346475]Extracting codine is an extremely lengthy and difficult process, if you're implying this kid can do it [/QUOTE]
Cold water extraction is easy as shit, I've done it myself.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;35346475]Except do you take into account that it's SO open that maybe they're bullshitting. There's a certain discreet nature to drug dealing as it's kinda illegal.[/QUOTE]
Private messages on Facebook is probably discreet enough for teenage shitheads like that.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;35346475]
Okay? You are the master as making vague incinuations. Still waiting for how that rap video has ANYTHING to do with what I said.[/QUOTE]
You posted an anecdote about your experiences with street lyfe that was totally irrelevant to the discussion at hand and I responded with a video, which if you'd been smart enough to read between the lines you would have realized I was mocking you.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;35346475]The worse he would make is lean. This is assuming we're moving past the fact that he gets "connects" and doesn't actually sell it himself.[/QUOTE]
Ah yes, "cold water extraction is hard", we've dismissed that theory already.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;35346475]Yeah ANYONE who has ever broken a law or shown disrespect for legal authority has to be a violent thug. I wonder if there is subtle racism here, or just one long dick sucking to authority. Which is it?[/QUOTE]
Damn nigga, you hard. There's a subtle difference between being willing to commit a felony to running a red light or smoking in a non-smoking area.
[QUOTE=Splendor;35354177]Cold water extraction is easy as shit, I've done it myself.
[/QUOTE]
well then I hope that when you get gunned down for being the wrong race in the wrong place at the wrong time that someone uses this post to prove that you were just a thug up to no good
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;35354304]well then I hope that when you get gunned down for being the wrong race in the wrong place at the wrong time that someone uses this post to prove that you were just a thug up to no good[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I really don't see how any drug use is relevant to this murder at all.
[QUOTE=Splendor;35354177]Cold water extraction is easy as shit, I've done it myself.[/quote]
[video=youtube;TMZi25Pq3T8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMZi25Pq3T8[/video]
[quote]Private messages on Facebook is probably discreet enough for teenage shitheads like that.[/quote]
It's typically good
[quote]You posted an anecdote about your experiences with street lyfe that was totally irrelevant to the discussion at hand and I responded with a video, which if you'd been smart enough to read between the lines you would have realized I was mocking you.[/quote]
lmao, if you think knowing a drug dealer is "experience with street lyfe", you are fucking coddled. Your idea of drug dealers as these underground thugs who are only reached by the street life elite just shows how much you know about it.
As for the video, if you were using that to mock me, you did a horrendous job at it.
[quote]Ah yes, "cold water extraction is hard", we've dismissed that theory already.[/quote]
"This anecdote PROVES Trayvon Martin was the aggressor" Is what this entire thing boils down to. I don't care about YOUR experiences, they differ from his. CPR is easy as shit, and I work in the medical field so I have to know it. Not everybody thinks it's easy. Not everybody knows it.
So simply saying "Oh I found it easy" doesn't mean Martin A: does it and B: can do it.
[quote]Damn nigga, you hard. There's a subtle difference between being willing to commit a felony to running a red light or smoking in a non-smoking area.[/QUOTE]
None of which is at all relevant to Trayvon Martin's murder.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;35358622]None of which is at all relevant to Trayvon Martin's murder.[/QUOTE]
You don't think there's a correlation between being willing to commit felonies and committing assault?
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztVMib1T4T4[/media]
[QUOTE=thisispain;35348986]doesn't look like a little innocent kid?
the fuck kind of purple drank are you drinking, he still looks like an innocent kid, just with gold teeth.[/QUOTE]
don't you see thisispain??? he looks like one of THOSE black people. i'm totally not racist tho!!
wow i threw up in my mouth a little writing that
[img]http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/516/nolimitnigga.jpg[/img]
Too soon?
[QUOTE=UncleJimmema;35362803][img]http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/516/nolimitnigga.jpg[/img]
Too soon?[/QUOTE]
it's always too soon for that stupid meme
So what if he posed with gold teeth and made tweets of any nature.
I don't care if he was swaggering around, calling him a cracker or totally trolling him, the fact is that idiot took matters into his own hands and shot a kid.
[QUOTE=Tea Guy;35325903]I'd like to know a few more details before I start taking sides, like did zimmerman have the weapon concealed or was he holding it in his hand while tailing him? I don't know about you but if I looked over my shoulder and saw a guy waving a gun around I'd fight for my life. But if trayvon attacked first and zimmerman drew the weapon afterwards than it was self defence. Also why did zimmerman bring a gun just because he looked shady?[/QUOTE]
The first lesson they teach in the class for concealed carry is NEVER BRANDISH YOUR WEAPON unless the threat is imminent. In most states, that alone constitutes an assault and carries Felony penalties and loss of concealed carry privileges. I am sure Mr. Zimmerman knew that. I think our general population watches too many movies. Even police officers don't un-holster their weapons without a good reason.
[editline]10th April 2012[/editline]
I sure hope this case doesn't take away our rights to defend ourselves. The "Stand Your Ground" law really isn't the problem. Neither is race. No one, regardless of culture, has a right to "kick your ass" for approaching or talking to you. Even for calling you names, you don't have the right to forcibly put your hands on someone else. It is called assault. When it gets to the point of you seeing stars due to head trauma, it becomes a fight for your life, if you are a "reasonable person."
[editline]10th April 2012[/editline]
...and all this talk about hearing a child wailing... If Trayvon was 17, do you believe he would sound like a little baby? I bet he wouldn't sound much different from a 28 year old "cryin' like a bitch" while getting his ass beaten. (Sorry George - Making a point). The attack-ee would probaby stop calling for help after firing a weapon just due to his ears ringing.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.