• Fallout 4? DOOM 4? Dishonored 2? Bethesda to host its own press conference for this year's E3.
    252 replies, posted
It better be Fallout 4 or Fallout related.
Honestly, i would buy fallout 4 even if it was "skyrim with guns". obviously i hope for more, but at the end of the day, even with all the issues that come with bethesda's buggy engine, a Bethesda game is still going to give me hours of fun and exploration that i simply can't get from other titles. Plus id be interested to see if they would do something involving close quarters take-down/stealth kill animations like the ones in featured in skyrim, something to make melee weapons more attractive to the average player.
[QUOTE=RichyZ;47113446]fallout 4 blue filter huge environment littered with badly written quests and blocked off areas as to maintain the illusion of being big but actually very restrictive[/QUOTE] I think it applies to all Bethesda games honestly, they are shallow sadly but they also have so much wasted potential, don't get me started on Todd Howard telling stuff to hype the game up but in the end it's something else, but let's see how things work out if they use new engine and new tools or what not, maybe just maybe there is some hope.
After having Obsidian treat my Fallout baby right I'm not sure I can go back to bethesda not understanding the world and putting in space marines and vampires I mean I'd like more Fallout I just want it to be well written and have shitloads of open ended ways to solve quests instead of 9 sidequests with like, 2 options each what I'm saying is NV was infinitely objectively better than 3 and I cannot believe people think otherwise and ffs, DOOM IV. After WolfensteinTNO turned out to be godly please give us that
I fully expect Doom to make an appearance, Dishonored 2 probably appearing as well (I really want more of that lore), a new Wolfenstein game [I]maybe[/I], with Fallout IV being teased right at the end to max out the hype. It probably will have a lot of eye candy for us to ooh at, but hopefully there'll be substance there as well. Either way though, I'm really excited for this- it's not every day a developer decides to have their own press conference at E3.
[QUOTE=Grindigo;47113512]I think it applies to all Bethesda games honestly, they are shallow sadly but they also have so much wasted potential, don't get me started on Todd Howard telling stuff to hype the game up but in the end it's something else, but let's see how things work out if they use new engine and new tools or what not, maybe just maybe there is some hope.[/QUOTE] See that mountain?
I really, REALLY hope for Dishonored 2. I got the first gifted by a fellow Facepuncher, and I've played it a lot. The story is really great, and the multiple approaches one can take is great. Before I used to kill everyone I'd met [sp]And spoil Boyle's party at all times[/sp], but then I started doing stealth and trying to find more valuables. I really like the depressed atmosphere Dunwall is in.
[QUOTE=Dick Slamfist;47113519]After having Obsidian treat my Fallout baby right I'm not sure I can go back to bethesda not understanding the world and putting in space marines and vampires I mean I'd like more Fallout I just want it to be well written and have shitloads of open ended ways to solve quests instead of 9 sidequests with like, 2 options each what I'm saying is NV was infinitely objectively better than 3 and I cannot believe people think otherwise and ffs, DOOM IV. After WolfensteinTNO turned out to be godly please give us that[/QUOTE] I'm hoping they looked at New Vegas and kind of got inspired by it. I'm pretty sure most people think New Vegas was just a better game, and they probably realise that.
I always imagined the reveal for Fallout 4 happening at some kind of conference like E3. Scene: The Bethesda Stage. The lights grow dim, then dark, and Ron Pearlman's voice uttering a single word plays out through the loudspeakers. "War." The crowd flips the fuck out as gritty imagery flashes on and off screen to the tune of a song by The Ink Spots, and as the imagery and the song cut off dramatically, a 3 second silence is broken by Pearlman's voice as it booms out one more time, with the words, "War Never Changes." But then Pearlman said he's not doing Fallout shit anymore so I dunno how they're gonna do a reveal if they are revealing Fo4.
One amendment to my reveal: After Pearlman says, "War Never Changes," a release date fades in on screen. 12/31/2020
Worst case scenario: Fallout Online
It's too soon for the next TES but if they announced it I would spontaneously combust in excitement.
[QUOTE=Cl0cK;47113801]Worst case scenario: Fallout Online[/QUOTE] oh [B]god[/B] no
I want nothing more than Dishonored 2 or alternatively a completely new IP by Arkane. I'm just looking through Arkane's wiki page and literally every game they have ever made got cancelled or was extremely good. (3 cancelled, 3 great games) Also, I supposed DOOM footage or a new Fallout or TES game would be kinda neat too. [QUOTE=Kirbyfactor;47112948]Give me Dishonored 2 please, played the shit out of the first one, 100 hours without dlc[/QUOTE] The DLC is great.
[QUOTE=Cl0cK;47113801]Worst case scenario: Fallout Online[/QUOTE] Luckily for us, Fallout Online got cancelled.
FO4 for me is basically what HL3 is for other people. I need it because I loved the previous games and I know it will be announced some day but for some reason I can't really imagine it happening.
[QUOTE=Cl0cK;47113801]Worst case scenario: Fallout Online[/QUOTE] Fallout MOBA
[QUOTE=Flapjacks;47113885]Fallout MOBA[/QUOTE] DON'T YOU EVEN SAY THAT
If its The Elder Scrolls VI or Fallout 4, I am hoping it has 64-bit support. Texture mods eat up the available memory as is.
[QUOTE=Zotobom;47113874]FO4 for me is basically what HL3 is for other people. I need it because I loved the previous games and I know it will be announced some day but for some reason I can't really imagine it happening.[/QUOTE] It's been 4-5 years since the last Fallout game, about the same time between Elder Scrolls games.
TBH I don't even demand much from FO4 or anything. I just want it to have a story that isn't complete ass,a world that's interesting and/or not a pain in the ass to navigate and moddability. Because anything apart from the story and the world are fixable by mods. Even then you could argue that the world is fixable by mods as well (although that would take a longass time ofcourse). Oh,and an engine that isn't a fossilized turd please
Why am I always so excited for Bethesda's buggy ass games and why do I always play them to death
[QUOTE=Zotobom;47113972]TBH I don't even demand much from FO4 or anything. I just want it to have a story that isn't complete ass,a world that's interesting and/or not a pain in the ass to navigate and moddability. Because anything apart from the story and the world are fixable by mods. Even then you could argue that the world is fixable by mods as well (although that would take a longass time ofcourse). Oh,and an engine that isn't a fossilized turd please[/QUOTE] IIRC, Bethesda are [U]well aware[/U] of the modding community and the power behind it. they WILL be modder friendly.
[QUOTE=Cl0cK;47113801]Worst case scenario: Fallout Online[/QUOTE] I'm still worried fallout 4 will have co-op and ruin shit
Since they have their own conference, that means they'll have quite a handful of things to announce, right? so we can hopefully expect a lot of dreams to come true that day
Honestly I don't want a fallout 4 from them their games are always great but really lack a lot of good qualities. Every single game they make has very clunky AI, clunky combat, and really underwhelming graphics. if they keep using that outdated as hell gamebryo... oh... sorry "Creation engine", then I'm just not going to bother at all. Fallout 3 already showed how old the engine is, skyrim wasn't any better. They make games that could be far better if they didn't use a shitty engine and actually scripted something, like variations of enemies and actually make dungeons seem unique. But they're too lazy. they don't deserve a series like fallout 4. They make games guaranteed to be fun, but they are always extremely over rated.
[QUOTE=_Maverick_;47114009]IIRC, Bethesda are [U]well aware[/U] of the modding community and the power behind it. they WILL be modder friendly.[/QUOTE] They even allow people to make their own engines for the games. The only restriction they put on OpenMW I can think of is that it isn't allowed to read data from the Xbox version, only PC.
[QUOTE=Dick Slamfist;47114013]I'm still worried fallout 4 will have co-op and ruin shit[/QUOTE] Bethesda are usually pretty anti-multiplayer because of the compromises that have to be made to support it, but as long as it's an enjoyable open-world experience I'd honestly be excited to have co-op in a TES or Fallout game
[QUOTE=J!NX;47114032]Honestly I don't want a fallout 4 from them their games are always great but really lack a lot of good qualities. Every single game they make has very clunky AI, clunky combat, and really underwhelming graphics. if they keep using that outdated as hell gamebryo... oh... sorry "Creation engine", then I'm just not going to bother at all. Fallout 3 already showed how old the engine is, skyrim wasn't any better. They make games that could be far better if they didn't use a shitty engine and actually scripted something, like variations of enemies and actually make dungeons seem unique. But they're too lazy. they don't deserve a series like fallout 4. They make games guaranteed to be fun, but they are always extremely over rated.[/QUOTE] Bethesda sure has talent but their engine was always tier shit and I think they compromised on a lot of stuff.
Fallout 4 or bust.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.