[QUOTE=Munchiselleh;30703622]did I once say that I felt bad for the kid? no, I didn't. I said that I felt bad for the mother, and everybody else here should, too.
anyone who doesn't probably has some fucked up perception of reality in which it was all her fault
also, I'm very glad that you are not and never will be in a position of power in which you might control who is and isn't sent to Gitmo.[/QUOTE]
don't agree with something - delusions of grandeur.
also, raging over a 16x16 icon.
real class act, bro.
I like how LulzSec is still active after this thread...
[QUOTE=plazzydan;30706420]I like how LulzSec is still active after this thread...[/QUOTE]
they just made their final release
[editline]25th June 2011[/editline]
they be buttplundered man
[QUOTE=cccritical;30704448]you completely ignored what lunchbox said so here let me bold it for you: [b]"Can't say I feel too much pity for him."[/b] and then attacked him, saying that he felt no empathy for his mother
then in your very next post you say
which I can only assume means that you [i]agree[/i] with what lunchbox ACTUALLY said, and not with what you think he said
flip flop[/QUOTE]
Actually, my post was directed towards him calling the entire situation hilarious; it wasn't aimed at the latter part of his post at all (you conveniently left out that part of the post, and instead bolded the part that I didn't care about). Him calling it hilarious means that he has pity for neither ryan nor his mother...
how is that flip flopping? I attacked him for calling it hilarious (as in it's not a tragedy, but instead a comedy--that's what I was talking about in my very first post, must be flip flopping) because there's nothing funny about the plight that involves both ryan and his mother. it's pretty sick to think that any aspect of that situation is funny.
[QUOTE=cccritical;30705434]But when lunchbox said "I don't feel bad for the kid" munchiselleh started badmouthing him for not feeling bad for the mother.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=LunchboxOfDoom;30694604]
That's pretty hilarious given what he's done, actually.
[/QUOTE]
considering the fact that he quoted my post when saying that, one can assume that by "that" he means what I was talking about: a situation that involves a mother losing her son. which isn't hilarious at all
And they just shut themselves down.
Welp.
[QUOTE=plazzydan;30706420]I like how LulzSec is still active after this thread...[/QUOTE]
I like how a few hours after this post they go to shit with the excuse of "It was our plan all along".
[QUOTE=Electrocuter;30711745]I like how a few hours after this post they go to shit with the excuse of "It was our plan all along".[/QUOTE]
loose lips sink ships
i know this is a bad bump but they defaced the source.
[url=http://twitter.com/#!/swagsec]Well... at least we still have Swagsec[/url]
Meh. That mother shouldn't have let her son mine all that Aspergite.
[quote]Someone called Jack Sparrow called blabbing incoherently... something about endless treasure chests and fountains of youth. Must be off now![/quote]
They just tweeted again. I'm worried.
That sounds like a whole lot of nothing, frankly.
[url]http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20649-exclusive-first-interview-with-key-lulzsec-hacker.html?page=1[/url]
Supposed interview with one of them. I have no idea if it is fake or not.
I miss the days when /b/ wasn't populated by total faggots who try to be edgy and cool by h4acking. It's like these kids heard of Pools Closed and though it'd be funny to try their own
[QUOTE='[sluggo];30899116'][url]http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20649-exclusive-first-interview-with-key-lulzsec-hacker.html?page=1[/url]
Supposed interview with one of them. I have no idea if it is fake or not.[/QUOTE]
Ugh, now people are going to think that anyone in Lulzsec actually cares about anything than infamy and their own amusement.
[QUOTE='[sluggo];30899116'][url]http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20649-exclusive-first-interview-with-key-lulzsec-hacker.html?page=1[/url]
Supposed interview with one of them. I have no idea if it is fake or not.[/QUOTE]
[quote]In 50 days, you saw how big and small companies were handling their user data incorrectly. You saw the US federal government vulnerable to security issues that could have just as easily been exploited by foreign governments.[/quote]
Little shit is full of himself.
[QUOTE=Reimu;30899899]Little shit is full of himself.[/QUOTE]
"You saw the US federal government vulnerable to security issues that could have just as easily been exploited by foreign governments"
This is the shit that makes me hate these guys the most. These assholes are so full of themselves...
They defaced a site which is a face of the CIA and somehow managed to convince people they hacked into a US database or some other shit like that. That's like saying you robbed a department store after spraying graffiti on the company's billboard, it's retarded.
[url]http://pastebin.com/374t9h8d[/url]
Wow, thats allot of defacing.
[QUOTE=NuclearAnnhilation;30899147]I miss the days when /b/ wasn't populated by total faggots who try to be edgy and cool by h4acking. It's like these kids heard of Pools Closed and though it'd be funny to try their own[/QUOTE]
You DO realise that anon isn't associated with lulzsec at all, right? In fact, I've seen tons of threads of people complaining about lulzsec, not praising them.
Yeah, most of LulzSec's members actually had falling outs with anonymous iirc.
No actualy the whole of lulzsec was a part of anon.
Now it's simply "Anti-sec".
[QUOTE=NuclearAnnhilation;30899147]I miss the days when /b/ wasn't populated by total faggots who try to be edgy and cool by h4acking.[/QUOTE][img]http://i55.tinypic.com/2mdoqch.png[/img]
"Remember when /b/ was good?"
The North Clapham joy of pub Sink Shitting, oh what funz
[highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("Gimmick" - verynicelady))[/highlight]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.