• North Korea drops all pretense, straight up says it's going to nuke Washington DC
    233 replies, posted
At least Galaxy News Radio will still stay up, right? Right, guys? RIGHT? OH GOD, GUYS, I CAN'T LIVE WITHOUT HEARING THREE-DOG DAILY.
[QUOTE=Blockhead;39834944]I would say its like an insane person that is carrying a knife. You know they can kill you, but you don't know if you can talk your way out of it.[/QUOTE] You're assuming the DPRK is insane, though. When they make threats like this, it's a calculated move.
NK is just like that one wannabe kid at school that everyone can beat up and yet he still tries to be tough
[QUOTE=B!N4RY;39835014]NK is just like that one wannabe kid at school that everyone can beat up and yet he still tries to be tough[/QUOTE] More like the kid that gets beaten up all the time, and tries to make up for it by acting tough to everyone. Which just gets him beaten up more.
Fuck I thought it took 4 pages for the first schoolkid analogy, which would probably be a new record for an NK thread. Missed the one on page 2
[img]http://i.imgur.com/GlG0D3f.jpg[/img] this is with the most recent nk nuke that they tested [editline]7th March 2013[/editline] (as if it would ever happen anyway)
-snip- Like I said, I'm not worried.
[QUOTE=Jo The Shmo;39835242][img]http://i.imgur.com/GlG0D3f.jpg[/img] this is with the most recent nk nuke that they tested [editline]7th March 2013[/editline] (as if it would ever happen anyway)[/QUOTE] That'd be a puny-ass explotion for a nuke.
aaa
lel gg guys
does NK have any military allies?
It's kinda ridiculous how lightly people take nuking another country. The DPRK is crazy, but the US is not. Could you imagine the international outrage if we killed several million innocent people on behalf of an aggression made by an oppressive state? Again this is all assuming we even use any large nukes anymore, which as far as I know we don't.
[QUOTE=Milkdairy;39836179]It's kinda ridiculous how lightly people take nuking another country. The DPRK is crazy, but the US is not. Could you imagine the international outrage if we killed several million innocent people on behalf of an aggression made by an oppressive state? Again this is all assuming we even use any large nukes anymore, which as far as I know we don't.[/QUOTE] hiroshima, nagasaki..
[QUOTE=opaali;39836269]hiroshima, nagasaki..[/QUOTE] Okay dude, TWO TIMES. Jeez, you obliterate 2 cities, and suddenly YOURE the assholes.
[QUOTE=opaali;39836269]hiroshima, nagasaki..[/QUOTE] In fuckin 1945! (Also with primitive bombs, these days our biggest bomb can still kill several million people, & level most of pyongyang)
[t]http://www.ambrosiasw.com/assets/images/press/defcon_media_kit/screenshots/defcon-screen05.jpg[/t]
Even if they launched a nuclear missle at us, couldnt we just shoot it down before it even got across the ocean?
What game is that?
[QUOTE=Milkdairy;39836433]What game is that?[/QUOTE] DEFCON
[QUOTE=Milkdairy;39836433]What game is that?[/QUOTE] Defcon [editline]7th March 2013[/editline] You bastard
[QUOTE=legolover122;39836497]Defcon [editline]7th March 2013[/editline] You bastard[/QUOTE] love you too
[QUOTE=Pierrewithahat;39829772]Why would China do anything at all? Seriously what's in it for them if they get involved at all? All they're gonna do is condemn the norths actions and sit back while the [B]North slowly gets hammered back into the dark ages.[/B][/QUOTE] you mean the new ages
[QUOTE=for no reason;39835794]That'd be a puny-ass explotion for a nuke.[/QUOTE] Au contraire, that's a worst-case scenario. The smaller the yield, the more residual radiation, the greater the nuclear fallout. Washington would be fucked.
[thumb]http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/1049437/106822496/stock-photo-man-in-blue-shirt-is-laughing-out-loud-with-his-head-back-and-his-hand-held-against-his-belly-106822496.jpg[/thumb][thumb]http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumblarge_462/1261443868f1t546.jpg[/thumb] [editline]7th March 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Jo The Shmo;39835242][img]http://i.imgur.com/GlG0D3f.jpg[/img] this is with the most recent nk nuke that they tested [editline]7th March 2013[/editline] (as if it would ever happen anyway)[/QUOTE] 1st off it'd get shot down 2nd off the damage would be bad but not nearly as bad as it actually should be, for a nuke, that's pretty small? [editline]7th March 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Vilusia;39829435]I'm not joking, also how you would you know? Have you been to NK?[/QUOTE] I know for a fact that they would simply be outmatched 10 - 1 I've seen at least like, 5 documentaries of it, and the people seem very 'devoted' and 'brainwashed' there is just no damn way
[QUOTE=polarbear.;39836000]does NK have any military allies?[/QUOTE] China is the closest ally they have, but they even voted against NK in the UN meeting. So, at this point I seriously doubt they have any REAL allies. With that being said, if they try anything then they're digging their own grave knowing that China would be knocking at their back door.
yeah north korea doesn't really have good nuclear weapons resources here's the one we dropped on nagasaki for comparison: [img]http://i.imgur.com/0cG7Acu.jpg[/img] and here's the largest one we currently own: [img]http://i.imgur.com/CBunV3Q.jpg[/img] [editline]8th March 2013[/editline] in fact, just play with it yourself, dunno why im just posting pictures: [url]http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/[/url]
[QUOTE=Adarrek;39829695]Im suprised they didnt use a picture from fallout 3 for their "concept" art[/QUOTE] Actually, that's a Fallout 3 concept art picture :v: (read the text at the bottom right: [url]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_4dEAVQx8F64/S_A4H39C49I/AAAAAAAAAF8/PiRQ0yfYoEw/s1600/concept02B.jpg[/url])
[QUOTE=Jo The Shmo;39836893]yeah north korea doesn't really have good nuclear weapons resources LONGPOST[/QUOTE] What about Tsar Bomba? The worlds biggest nuke? EDIT: In comparison, Tsar nuke VS NK = God damn that is pathetic :v:
tsar nuke would also reach baltimore, that's pretty devastating
US has a pretty massive arsenal compared to NK. The B8-3 can wipe out Pyongyang without touching SK. But I hope we don't have to use it if needed, all that's needed to be done is take out those in charge of NK, allow a more sensible leader to take control, and see if SK and NK can unite.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.