• GOP voters split over Romney, Santorum, new poll shows
    50 replies, posted
[img]http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m02f9gCfBv1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg[/img] [url]http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-02-23/swing-states-health-care-obama/53260222/1[/url] God help us all
[QUOTE=Stick it in her pooper;34898552]Do your own research next time, I'm not here to give you an Austrian economics lesson.[/QUOTE] Austrian economics is an oxymoron, unless you're speaking to the economics of the nation and not the school of thought. [URL="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/economics"]Economics is a social science.[/URL] [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_School#Methodology"]By definition, the Austrian school does not utilize science.[/URL] Ergo, Austrian school "economics" are not economics.
This is disgusting.
I honestly can't see the word Santorum without being moderately grossed out.
[QUOTE=The Baconator;34894551]Romneytorum: An emotionless psychopath with no restraint in smothering you in his frothy mixture of fecal matter and lube.[/QUOTE] who wears flip flops
[QUOTE=Lambeth;34898791]If you're talking about the Bailouts those were Bush. And the republicans are really the only ones who care about that contraception crap.[/QUOTE] Those are secret federal reserve loans to foreign, they have nothing to do with bush.
Couldn't they pick someone more sane than Sanatorum. Like Ron Paul?
Paul and Santorum aren't completely grounded, but at least Paul is looking somewhat in the right direction. Santorum is backwards and corrupted. I really wish Paul's economic ideas weren't so radical, I think he understands what it takes to make america a more respectable place. I agree with ending the imperialist mindset, greatly reducing our military presence, respecting treaties and the constitution, less federal intervention in economics, fighting inflation, less foreign aid. The problem is he takes a lot of these things to the extreme. NO foreign aid, rapid debt elimination, enforcing he gold standard, NO government intervention in economics... as much as I would love for these to be good ideas, the world just isn't stable enough for it to work. If I do vote for Paul, and it's something I'm milling over, it would be on the hope that what we get would be not Ron Paul but a Ron Paul "lite", a Ron Paul with the same direction but maybe 33% magnitude. It's not a dictatorship after all and actions still have to go through congress, so I would hope that most of his radical ideas would be watered down by the time they reach reality. Small safe steps instead of radical leaps. Personally I think a watered down Ron Paul would be a good thing.
[QUOTE=splitsticks;34902111]I really wish Paul's economic ideas weren't so radical, I think he understands what it takes to make america a more respectable place. I agree with ending the imperialist mindset, greatly reducing our military presence, respecting treaties and the constitution, less federal intervention in economics, fighting inflation, less foreign aid. The problem is he takes a lot of these things to the extreme. NO foreign aid, rapid debt elimination, enforcing he gold standard, NO government intervention in economics... as much as I would love for these to be good ideas, the world just isn't stable enough for it to work. [/QUOTE] Paul's economic ideals are merely a "quirk" in comparison to his insane social ideals.
What is radical is his being against Abortion. [editline]27th February 2012[/editline] rate me late I pretty much said the same thing as Aredbomb
[QUOTE=person11;34898901][img]http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m02f9gCfBv1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg[/img] [url]http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-02-23/swing-states-health-care-obama/53260222/1[/url] God help us all[/QUOTE] please no, lord please don't let this happen please america, stop this, please --the rest of the world
What happened to common sense? Who would actually think these guys are a good idea?
[QUOTE=Aredbomb;34902144]Paul's economic ideals are merely a "quirk" in comparison to his insane social ideals.[/QUOTE] looks like you missed my post
[QUOTE=Bobie;34894512]26% in support for santorum? even 1% would surprise me damn i want herman cain to return :( he was way funnier and less offensive by far[/QUOTE] Even though he would be a terrible leader, he seems like a decent guy.
[QUOTE=CommunistCookie;34902955]Even though he would be a terrible leader, he seems like a decent guy.[/QUOTE] You mean Cain right? Please tell me you're talking about Herman Cain.
I feel bad cause I think Im turning into a liberal, help me guys :( Ehhhh never mind, Im staying center
[QUOTE=BusterBluth;34903199]I feel bad cause I think Im turning into a liberal, help me guys :([/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KHdhrNhh88[/media]
[QUOTE=person11;34898901][img]http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m02f9gCfBv1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg[/img] [url]http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-02-23/swing-states-health-care-obama/53260222/1[/url] God [B]go away and take your santorum with you.[/B][/QUOTE] FTFY
I hope Obama wipes the floor with Santorum.. [sp]but I feel bad for whoever has to clean that up[/sp]
[QUOTE=riceninja;34903271][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KHdhrNhh88[/media][/QUOTE] You're real fond of that guy, aren't you? [URL="http://www.angrybearblog.com/2007/01/in-my-opinion-thomas-sowell-is-hack.html"]It's too bad any time you actually bring numbers into an argument he turns out to be an imbecile.[/URL]
inc split decision to force a default on obama second term. Ron Paul 2012.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.