Show's Over! Nigerian Student Creates Proof Gay Marriage Scientifically Impossible - Polidicks

[QUOTE=lonefirewarrior;42186877]But if gay people are like magnets, does that mean we can use them to make maglev trains?[/QUOTE] I don't know but I do occasionally stick gay people to my fridge

[QUOTE=kaze4159;42187174]If being straight is positive and gay is negative, this should apply to all positives and negatives also If I take two vacuums creating a negative pressure and put them together, they attract If I take two fans creating positive pressure and put them together, they won't attract By his logic I've just proven that being straight is physically impossible[/QUOTE] That's not the logic he's using though. He saying that female = south pole and male = north pole not sexuality

[t]http://i.imgur.com/nZtoy.jpg[/t] I think that proves his point wrong.

[QUOTE=EcksDee;42187280]That's not the logic he's using though. He saying that female = south pole and male = north pole not sexuality[/QUOTE] My logic still makes as much sense as his :v:

But wait, what if you put two bar magnets in two dildos facing opposite directions? Would the penises not touch? Further testing is needed

fucking sexualities, how do they work?

fucking homophobic prick cunt ill jab him

science 1 gay 0

Does he not realize that gay sex doesn't involve north pole to north pole

[QUOTE=Zeke129;42187739]Does he not realize that gay sex doesn't involve north pole to north pole[/QUOTE]Frotting.

the sad/tragically funny part is that the nigerian media is actually treating as correct and some kind of impressive finding :suicide:

But wouldn't this also imply (if we follow his broken logic) that males and females are wrong too and the only acceptable gender is hermaphrodites because monopoles do not exist and according to him, a magnet is both male and female.

I think I just felt my IQ drop 50 points when reading that.

This is comedy gold. I would expect this kind of article from The Onion, not from actual news source :v:.

I wonder if he has any relation with the Ugandan scientists that made a "space probe". [img]http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/5337/gj51228841.jpg[/img]

What about waterparticles and their cohesion? They're all the same molecules, yet they stick together!

Then [i]we've done the impossible, and that makes us mighty![/i]

Ech, this is foolishness; just because he used physics as a poor analogy don't mean it's a legit thing. Love and attraction transcend flesh; they be things of spark and chemical in the CPU, not of meat and bone. It's like when Quagmire said "two halves can't make a whole without a hole *giggity witch doctor routine*", and dismisses the butt.

I'm sorry, but is this [B][I]really[/I][/B] a post grad student's report? This is worse shit than I did starting my BTEC.

I have no clue why people in my culture hate gays. The majority of them are overzealous too.

[QUOTE=ironman17;42188749]Ech, this is foolishness; just because he used physics as a poor analogy don't mean it's a legit thing. Love and attraction transcend flesh; they be things of spark and chemical in the CPU, not of meat and bone. It's like when Quagmire said "two halves can't make a whole without a hole *giggity witch doctor routine*", and dismisses the butt.[/QUOTE] We would never have guessed that physics and human attraction are not analogous in the slightest.

magnets. fucking. magnets?

my doctoral thesis on why gay marriage is wrong it's [b]adam and eve[/b], not [b]adam and steve[/b] please mail me my phd/research grant xo [editline]14th September 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Shotz;42188885]magnets. fucking. magnets?[/QUOTE] [img]http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/002/395/magnets_c.jpg[/img]

He found that out with beakers and bottles? Thats like using literature to prove peanut butter and jelly don't belong together.

Has he written a report on it? I really want to read it.

[QUOTE=Swebonny;42189085]Has he written a report on it? I really want to read it.[/QUOTE] I think the whole thing is in the article.

The way he's talking about Poles... Guys I think he might be racist.

un·nat·u·ral /ˌənˈnaCH(ə)rəl/ Adjective Contrary to the ordinary course of nature; abnormal. Not existing in nature; artificial. Synonyms abnormal - artificial - factitious - affected So, the paper he wrote his theory on, is that natural? Did it come straight from the tree as a sheet of white, or was it made artificially? What about the ink used to write it, or the plastic that it's held in? Or maybe the computer he may have used to type it up? Or even the magnets he was using to prove this theory, were they natural as well? Pot, motherfucking kettle. [editline]14th September 2013[/editline] Also he's only trying to prove gay [I]marriage[/I] is impossible, what about gay relations, what about gay sex, what about other things that only gay people can involve?

[QUOTE=MasterFen006;42189196]un·nat·u·ral /ˌənˈnaCH(ə)rəl/ Adjective Contrary to the ordinary course of nature; abnormal. Not existing in nature; artificial. Synonyms abnormal - artificial - factitious - affected So, the paper he wrote his theory on, is that natural? Did it come straight from the tree as a sheet of white, or was it made artificially?[/QUOTE] The cookie jar gets deeper...

[QUOTE=TheProfane;42188572]What about waterparticles and their cohesion? They're all the same molecules, yet they stick together![/QUOTE] Water isn't cohesive friend, it's a liquid.