Xbox One memory performance improved for production console.
39 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Pinut;41228568]30fps? not impressed. was really hoping 60fps to be the norm now...[/QUOTE]
I don't really care to be honest. I'm perfectly content with 30fps, anything higher is a bonus. Sure shit looks nice at 60fps but I never see it as that big of a deal.
[editline]28th June 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Sharker;41230662]No that would be beyond two souls
[Media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1GoMkyLdKI&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/media][/QUOTE]
That game is made by the same people that made Fahrenheit and Heavy Rain. Pretty obvious it would keep the same formula.
[QUOTE=MaddaCheeb;41231188]So that protagonist can survive a goddamn lava rock the size of a ship being thrown right at him and get up like it was nothing, yet [sp]Shepard in ME3 can't take a hit of a laser beam without nearly dying?[/sp][/QUOTE]
the fuck is the point of this post
those two games aren't even the related at all. like, not one bit. you're literally just finding reasons to make fun of ME3
[QUOTE=Beetle179;41229826]Why's the framerate video such a big deal
The game is obviously not in a completed build and it's not running on the hardware it's designed for
Not to mention, why is an announcement that the Xbone is being [I]improved[/I] a bad thing
Stop fucking irrationally looking for reasons to be mad at Microsoft[/QUOTE]
Microsoft:
[QUOTE=Mac2468;41228365]Microsoft's xbone marketing strategy: make it look shitty from the get go, then act like they've improved it so more people will buy it.[/QUOTE]
Sony:
[quote=Paraphrasing what a random Facepunch user would have]Wow, Microshit is just getting beaten worse and worse. I repeat, PS4 is going to dominate this generations.[/quote]
[QUOTE=Sharker;41230662]No that would be beyond two souls
[Media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1GoMkyLdKI&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/media][/QUOTE]
Holy shit I laughed so hard when the shield was brought up. I thought the concept of the ghost watching you or whatever was that it subtly helps you and guides you, not give you fucking super powers.
RYSE = ooh shiny armor graphics
[QUOTE=Zephyrs;41228328]So its quick time events: the game?
The fuck am I watching?[/QUOTE]
Even if you fail at pressing the button or you press the wrong button you succeed.
[QUOTE=The Un-Men;41231497]...
So what's the point of a minimal advantage in hardware if they can't write an engaging game for their lives?[/QUOTE]
So it's Microsoft's fault that Crytek made a meh looking game? And that somehow has something to do with the quality of the hardware?
[QUOTE=milkandcooki;41230388]a solid 30. that's way better than 90% of PS3/360 games that frequently dipped below 20-25.
shame that ryse isn't 60 fps, but isn't the new call of duty game supposta be running at 60 fps on the new consoles?[/QUOTE]
60 FPS has always been the goal for CoD so it should be. Coincidently Titanfall, from ex-IW employees, also has a target for 60 FPS.
I really hope it becomes the new standard because 30 FPS in a shooter is unplayable.
While I find it a bit odd that people are flooding to buy the Xbone now. I don't mind since imagine if Microsoft would've been dumb enough to keep their drm policies and whatnot. Sony would dominate this console generation. At least now there will still be some competition between the two so both sides will have to do their best.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.