Debbie Wasserman Schultz has joined the Hillary Campaign, as confirmed by Hillary's statement on her resignation.
[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CoKIkbjW8AEsgBR.jpg[/img]
No words.
[QUOTE=da space core;50768726]I just posted a link from there myself and it went fine, my friends could see it and all.[/QUOTE]
wikileaks kicked up a fuss about it so they removed the automated removal and blamed google
The fact that she mentions Florida specifically, twice, and no other states is very telling and sort of what I was assuming in the other thread and backed up by what others said: there was no way to just kick her out of DNC chair so she agreed to step down and work with Clinton through her campaign. Most Democrat voters might think this a spit in the face regarding the email leaks but Florida is a solid Clinton state and as a swing state is more occupied by older, establishment voters who, in my experience living here, never really got Sanders message as clearly as Clintons. I voted for Sanders but that was almost purely what I learned online, he didn't seem to have a ground game at all in the Tampa area atleast.
[url]https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5492[/url]
[QUOTE]Attached is a script for a new video we’d like to use to mop up some more taco bowl engagement, and demonstrate the Trump actually isn’t trying. [/QUOTE]
[editline]24th July 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=da space core;50768726]I just posted a link from there myself and it went fine, my friends could see it and all.[/QUOTE]
[media]https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/757330299491606528[/media]
we accidentally censord u :^)
[QUOTE=Wii60;50768856][url]https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5492[/url]
[editline]24th July 2016[/editline]
[media]https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/757330299491606528[/media]
we accidentally censord u :^)[/QUOTE]
It's goobles fault we swear!!
Why do they even bother with censorship in this particular case? is it not obvious that the resulting fallout would be greater than any potential damage control, especially in a fucking country where censorship goes against some our most highly held ideals?
[QUOTE=DiscoMelon;50769767]Why do they even bother with censorship in this particular case? is it not obvious that the resulting fallout would be greater than any potential damage control, especially in a fucking country where censorship goes against some our most highly held ideals?[/QUOTE]
They're trying to mask direct suppression with automated censorship errors so if they get caught it can be written off as a technical mistake.
[t]https://endchan.xyz/.media/cf7a34d8c4a5b7df28ed5a60e4f05ce2-imagejpeg/alias/1469467515107.jpg[/t]
Is this real?
"singles and this is all a load of shit"
he got quads
I think we know the answer
[editline]25th July 2016[/editline]
But in all seriousness couldn't you just check the links? The pic has the emails and those imdb pages are linked too and if anything there isn't linked it shouldn't be hard to find
[editline]25th July 2016[/editline]
This shit's spooky, I've never heard of bohemian grove before
/pol/ acting like they've never seen a secret society before. Not every single one is dedicated to conspiracy or murder, guys.
Just imagine if Burning Man was a secret-handshake sort of thing where you had to be in the club to know where it was being held from year to year. It'd look really fucking weird if someone made a random sighting of the Man burning, and if all they saw was a giant mass of people in the desert around a massive burning wooden statue before leaving, the conspiracy theories would be rife.
Leo Laporte visited and spoke at Bohemian Grove once. It's basically a private summer camp for millionaire/billionaire adults where they can be social and normal for a while without being scrutinized by the outside. Nobody ever got a photo of Steve Ballmer slamming eight shots of tequila (at least not after he graduated university), but it doesn't mean he never did it, it just would've been in a private setting like this.
[url]http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2016/07/25/facebook-wikileaks-links/[/url]
hey we blocked the wikileaks links, but we fixed it
oh you wanna know why? who cares thats all in the past
meanwhile 4chan helped build a list of people who donated and seeking board positions
[t]https://i.sli.mg/NW4acW.png[/t]
and did you know that the head of the DNC LGBT council "hates those [lgbt] people so damn much"?
[url]https://www.outfrontonline.com/news/leakeddnc-leaders-throw-shade-black-lgbt-donors/[/url]
[media]https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/757656744474488832[/media]
edit:
so much collusion
[url]https://www.reddit.com/r/DNCleaks/comments/4ulzhm/evidence_of_collusion_sr_hrc_advisor_dnc_finance/[/url]
-snip-
[QUOTE=Matthew0505;50776479][media]https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/757573781191847936[/media][/QUOTE]
"Let's get this around without attribution"
What does "without attribution" mean exactly?
[QUOTE=mcharest;50789040]"Let's get this around without attribution"
What does "without attribution" mean exactly?[/QUOTE]
probably means they wanted to spread the article and make it seem as if it had no author so blame couldn't be placed on anyone
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.