[QUOTE=Gardasian;29497982][img_thumb]http://publicintellectual.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/tin-foil-hat.jpg?w=270&h=325[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
The fuck is up with it's left eye....?
[QUOTE=c0nk3r;29465117]lol his mom was 18[/QUOTE]
Who gives a shit. She birthed a fucking president.
[QUOTE=pastorpaul;29497207]A scan is going to show the notary seal.
One is clearly marked in pen with the date 6/21/62 next to said seal(this means that that document was signed and notarized on that date by the notary witness). That photo is not of a copy, it is the genuine document.[/QUOTE]
Basically I know you're wrong through one fact.
The people that have to vet presidents know what they're doing more than any kid on the internet does. And if there was a conspiracy to get him elected through something like this, you're going to need a lot more proof than layers in photoshop and illustrator.
You'd think that a forgery of the presidents birth certificate would be a lot more well done than that but no, pastorpaul here knows what the shits going down.
[editline]28th April 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=pastorpaul;29497719]There isnt an original, it was fabricated. While you have provided no support for the second, and the second doesnt make any sense.
No, nor do i care.[/QUOTE]
Occams razor is the "Simplest solution is often the best/truest". Your solution is so convoluted it makes less sense. So why follow it?
all im saying is that the document looks phoney, and scans of documents dont show up in layers in illustrator... that is all
[QUOTE=pastorpaul;29500069]all im saying is that the document looks phoney, and scans of documents dont show up in layers in illustrator... that is all[/QUOTE]
...Yes they do, it depends on the scanner itself and the program and the save files.
So a picture of the document looks phoney to you, this is sure fire proof the president isn't an american
[QUOTE=pastorpaul;29500069]all im saying is that the document looks phoney, and scans of documents dont show up in layers in illustrator... that is all[/QUOTE]
They do when you edit/clean them up.
Holy crap, I was born at the same Kapiolani hospital.
[QUOTE=Gardasian;29497868]George bush.[/QUOTE]
They can't check for everything.
Y'know, I'm starting to wonder why people bicker over the stupidest shit.
I think the government should shut down for a week. Show every ungrateful bastard squabbling over this exactly what they take for granted. When it starts back up again, everyone will either have shut up or been murdered for continuing to be stupid about it.
[QUOTE=Broseph_;29465798]Uhh... under U.S. law anyone born on U.S. Territory is automatically a natural born citizen, so unless you are saying all Peurto Ricans are second class Citizens I don't know what you are going on about[/QUOTE]
Do embassies count?
[QUOTE=mokkan;29502640]Do embassies count?[/QUOTE]
If you mean an embassy in the United States, most likely.
If you mean a US embassy in (for instance) the Republic of the Congo, probably.
[QUOTE=Gardasian;29497868]George bush.[/QUOTE]
The rules don't say anything about if the President can be retarded or not.
[QUOTE=thisispain;29497622]so obama's birth certificate copy was digitally edited and recreated as a forgery
that's more believable as opposed to obama's birth certificate copy was digitized and signed for authenticity?
do you know what occam's razor is?[/QUOTE]
occam's razor is the thing they used to cut out the fake birth certificate
[QUOTE=Gardasian;29497587]What pastor is saying is that the COPY of the birth certificate from that hospital in hawaii has no seal anywhere to show that it is the authentic birth certificate.
And when you open the thing in illustrator, you can remove the layers that look like they were edited, I don't know how you are coming about to this "digitally scanned" thing..
He also mentioned the twins that were born after Obama have a lower birth identification number and they were born at the same hospital which is also very very confusing.[/QUOTE]
Can you say fucking paranoid?
[QUOTE=pastorpaul;29497563]Digitized document you ass hat. A photo is not a document. I am not looking at PDFs or DOCs of them, I am looking at jpegs. A photo of a piece of paper is not a proper digital storage method.[/QUOTE]
Digitized = converted to digital (binary) form. The fact that you are looking at it on a computer means that the analogue image was sampled and quantised, therefore digitized. Digitizing does not mean you OCR the document and have it as text, it just means it is represented in binary form, like a JPEG image.
If it was 'digitized' or not does not matter at all anyway...
[QUOTE=Identity;29498906]Who gives a shit. She birthed a fucking president.[/QUOTE]
I just think its funny :v:
[editline]29th April 2011[/editline]
Guys its totally fake they didnt have computers in 1960's :frogdowns:
Why would people think that Hawaii isn't a state in 1961?
It became a state in 1959.
Besides, being born in a territory which becomes a state basically instantly makes you into a citizen anyway I'm p sure.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
