Mysterious submarine spotted in Swedish waters, Swedish Navy is in full alert - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Hizan;32319042]With that map I found a Polish navy boat near by doing the same kind of motions (identified from the track) as the Ueberherrn. Odd.[/QUOTE] Poland is invading! :tinfoil:

[QUOTE=DarkCisco;32325561]Poland is invading! :tinfoil:[/QUOTE] And about time, too!

[QUOTE=Clio;32319020]haha what navy[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/pYzQd.png[/IMG]

[QUOTE=sHiBaN;32323442]Sweden is mentioned and the only thing that comes to mind are furniture and meatballs? What the fuck. What about the beautiful women there? Homo, man.[/QUOTE] When I think of Sweden I think of death metal and hot women as well as meatballs and Ikea.

[IMG]http://fox.naurunappula.com/6f/46/6f46061856373e6c/0/screen/535787.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=faze;32321637]Something tells me you have trust issues.[/QUOTE] You've seen his previous threads right? etc, making a nuclear reactor and all that junk.

Russia would not waste the time and effort to cross from St.Petersburg to Stockholm to try and invade with one submarine. A more likely chance would be they invade a crappier or smaller nation such as Latvia or Mongolia. In all honesty I think it was just something to help with satellites or to protect the general area because they think Hitler came back from the dead and will destroy Denmark and Sweden with his undead armies.

[QUOTE=Chernobyl426;32334544]Russia would not waste the time and effort to cross from St.Petersburg to Stockholm to try and invade with one submarine. A more likely chance would be they invade a crappier or smaller nation such as Latvia or Mongolia. In all honesty I think it was just something to help with satellites or to protect the general area because they think Hitler came back from the dead and will destroy Denmark and Sweden with his undead armies.[/QUOTE] Considering there has been tension between the Russians and the us(The Swedes) for several hundreds of years, and they have had Submarines in our waters before.

[QUOTE=Profanwolf;32334482]You've seen his previous threads right? etc, making a nuclear reactor and all that junk.[/QUOTE] I don't care if you don't believe me. Just don't come storming into my threads and start to flame me.

[QUOTE=latin_geek;32325143]Sweden has a Navy? :v:[/QUOTE] Yes, with some of the best submarines. [QUOTE=Swebonny;32321807]Funky pattern by a German and Polish military ship outside Göteborg. [img]http://laddauppbilder.se/?di=513161594415[/img] [img]http://laddauppbilder.se/?di=913161593586[/img] Pictures are from a few hours ago.[/QUOTE] This is really disturbing.

[QUOTE=GunFox;32321913]How that giant fucker is nearly invisible to RADAR, I have no idea, but even modern RADAR systems have a hell of a time detecting it.[/QUOTE] Wow maybe because it's a fucking [I]stealth[/I] bomber, it's designed to not be detectable by radar due to its shape and the fact the material it is made of can absorb radar signals, so the signals just flow right over it's body or get ingested by the craft and the only response they see back from the base is on level to average radar static. The only way to fully detect it is via heat signature from it's engines (which is hard as it has they are fully concealed inside the crafts body to minimise this), visual or audio (which again is pretty hard as it's not very loud either). Also like to mention that some of your fancy B-2's also are fitted with LPIR systems so they can tell if they've been detected or not, pretty fucking overkill if you ask me. Overall the B-2 is most likely one of the most successful stealth crafts which has been produced to this date.

Talking about stealth, the swedish built Gotland class submarine was in a naval exercise with the US navy. It "sunk" the USS Ronald Reagan, a US aircraft carrier. And went undetected for the whole exercise. The Swedish Armed Forces really is powerful.

[QUOTE=AntiNazi;32324192]Russian:Oh no comrad! The submarine broke! Swedish:Well not again. Russian:Let's just kamikaze in that squary wreck with holes. Swedish:Fine. *broom broom* Swedish:OH NO IT'S A NUCLEAR SILO! Both:FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-KABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMB[/QUOTE] FP isn't the place for this shit

[QUOTE=EDDY TT;32338468]Wow maybe because it's a fucking [I]stealth[/I] bomber, it's designed to not be detectable by radar due to its shape and the fact the material it is made of can absorb radar signals, so the signals just flow right over it's body or get ingested by the craft and the only response they see back from the base is on level to average radar static. The only way to fully detect it is via heat signature from it's engines (which is hard as it has they are fully concealed inside the crafts body to minimise this), visual or audio (which again is pretty hard as it's not very loud either). Also like to mention that some of your fancy B-2's also are fitted with LPIR systems so they can tell if they've been detected or not, pretty fucking overkill if you ask me. Overall the B-2 is most likely one of the most successful stealth crafts which has been produced to this date.[/QUOTE] That statement I made was more along the lines of "how aircraft carriers float, I'll never know." I actually DO know, it doesn't mean it isn't an amazing bit of engineering that is almost too awesome to comprehend. :P

[QUOTE=Mr.T;32338766]Talking about stealth, the swedish built Gotland class submarine was in a naval exercise with the US navy. It "sunk" the USS Ronald Reagan, a US aircraft carrier. And went undetected for the whole exercise. The Swedish Armed Forces really is powerful.[/QUOTE] So did many other submarines, it's really nothing special anymore. Their aircraft carriers really aren't as protected as they make them seem to be.

[QUOTE=Mr.T;32338766]Talking about stealth, the swedish built Gotland class submarine was in a naval exercise with the US navy. It "sunk" the USS Ronald Reagan, a US aircraft carrier. And went undetected for the whole exercise. The Swedish Armed Forces really is powerful.[/QUOTE] That's mostly thanks to the Diesel Engine, anyway. Well that's what I thought anyway.

Oh Russia, you can your crazy submarine adventures.

[QUOTE=GunFox;32318987]Pretty much zero. Russia gains nothing from hostilities with Sweden. Nobody gains anything from hostilities with Sweden.[/QUOTE] Hard to believe they used to be military superpowers.

[QUOTE=crackberry;32355919]Hard to believe they used to be military superpowers.[/QUOTE] You mean Sweden used to be a military superpower?

Aliens

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32355954]You mean Sweden used to be a military superpower?[/QUOTE] first result [url]http://www.heraldtimesonline.com/stories/2008/10/19/experience.qp-8209582.sto[/url]

its the loch ness monster!

[QUOTE=Eltro102;32356510]its the loch ness monster![/QUOTE] Just... No. That's way too obvious to be funny. It's also way too bad to be funny.

[QUOTE=B!N4RY;32321607]That thing looks like as if a B2 just crashed into the ocean[/QUOTE] What? [thumb]http://www.resonancepub.com/images/stealth_ship.gif[/thumb] [thumb]http://map.vbgood.com/B2/b-2-1999407b2.jpg[/thumb] You mean the F117.

[QUOTE=ejonkou;32335159]Considering there has been tension between the Russians and the us(The Swedes) for several hundreds of years, and they have had Submarines in our waters before.[/QUOTE] I don't think anyone would side with Russia except maybe China and Korea. Sweden is a peaceful nation and wouldn't get ditched by Europe and the US if they got attacked. At this point I don't think anyone wants to risk war except for African countries and the Koreas for the simple fact the weapons we (Most of the world) have now are scary and devastating.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;32355954]You mean Sweden used to be a military superpower?[/QUOTE] Well, yes.