• FOX: Majority of Likely Voters Agree 'Socialist' Accurately Describes Obama
    557 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Doriol;23265682]could you stop being a manchild[/QUOTE] Could you start reading what I'm actually saying.
[QUOTE=MrEndangered;23265712]Could you start reading what I'm actually saying.[/QUOTE] every time somebody asks you to do something very simple, you refuse to
quote the parts of the article that you think are what makes the article biased and tell us why you think they're biased what if we pick 3 other news sources and they all happen to be biased too?? you need to show us yourself and not make statements like these if you don't plan to support them i hate fox news as much as any other guy but you can't just blindly say their stuff is biased without supporting yourself
[QUOTE=Doriol;23265737]every time somebody asks you to do something very simple, you refuse to[/QUOTE] I've read all three articles all the way through, why would anyone want to debate something they're too lazy to read? Nobody can grasp a subject they've not read a background to.
[QUOTE=MrEndangered;23265761]I've read all three articles all the way through, why would anyone want to debate something they're too lazy to read? Nobody can grasp a subject they've not read a background to.[/QUOTE] you don't understand arguments at all and you should stop trying to argue anything
[QUOTE=Doriol;23265766]you don't understand arguments at all and you should stop trying to argue anything[/QUOTE] Explain to me how not reading the source material and doing nothing but saying 'stop being a manchild' is better than providing a counter argument to what I'm saying. Ok, here: 'Capitol Hill' source "“With the recovery barely visible and Democrats still behind on the economy, progressives should not seek a mandate based on their performance, but on their advocacy for ordinary people versus Wall Street and on where they want to take the country.” This is an analysis of some of the findings of the poll. Deeply opinionated, but it's trying to find basis to the findings. "The poll gave Republicans a 48%-42% advantage in the generic congressional ballot. It found Democrats trailing Republicans on key economic issues including jobs (42%-38%), the overall economy (44%-39%) and the deficit (43%-30%). A majority (50%-43%) also favors tax cuts over “more investment,” i.e., more federal spending." Here we see a breakdown of the findings related to key political areas. And here, we see a compilation of the positive points of the poll. (Arguing both the positive and negative arguments shows impartiality) This provides evidence that the American people are not anti-Obama or give any opinion on him personally, but an economic opinion. "The only good news for the White House is that most (51%-36%) think the Bush administration is more to blame for the economy." Lets compare and contrast the article headlines: "Democratic Poll Has Grim News For Party, Obama" "Try Not to Think of a Donkey November looks worse and worse for the Democrats." Now lets compare that to Fox News: "Poll: 55% of Likely Voters Think Obama Is a Socialist" Key: Headlining and reporting on ONE, SMALL aspect of the poll. There is no opinion on the economic and political aspect of the poll, or the findings of the peoples opinion on Wall Street and the Bush Administration. It's been completely taken out of context and magnified for no reason other than slander. Also 'Likely Voters'? That's a threat, not news. No. It's: "People think Obama is a socialist" Fox News = Bias
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;23244046]The only practical system of government is one run by computers. People are too emotional to run an efficient society.[/QUOTE] This. Everything works perfectly in theory, but no one ever factors greed and corruption because they cannot.
[QUOTE=Grasp;23266255]This. Everything works perfectly in theory, but no one ever factors greed and corruption because they cannot.[/QUOTE] The one big thing a human ruler has over a computer one is that a human ruler is changeable. A human ruler also doesn't have the option to rule for a thousand years. The only way a logical ruling computer would change (For example, to adapt to a different political world and changing attitudes) would be for humans to change the computer, which is.. redundant. Despite people who keep referring to computers as 'the ultimate logic', it's logical is a mathematical one, not a human one. A computer would still struggle with the concept of understanding the arguments for legalizing narcotics, or the aspect of personal freedom for example. The world wouldn't be without many faults.
[QUOTE=SteelReal;23265531]There are some basic utilities that should be distributed. I won't argue with you there.[/QUOTE] explain to me how public education (something I'm assuming you support) is more important than public health care (something I'm assuming you don't support). Explain to me how public education is vital while not dying of a treatable illness because you can't afford insurance is not vital to a civilized and well-functioning society also you can't complain about lazy poor people or use the word socialism GO!
[QUOTE=Doriol;23265394]free schooling is useless and only holds back children who want to learn[/QUOTE] hahahaha how? [editline]04:57AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Doriol;23265766]you don't understand arguments at all and you should stop trying to argue anything[/QUOTE] lol doriol you're a joke
[QUOTE=Warhol;23267036]lol doriol you're a joke[/QUOTE] Fairly good troll, though.
[QUOTE=Warhol;23267036]hahahaha how? [/QUOTE] He's probably one of those kids who felt like they learned more out of school because they spent all their time reading Wikipedia or something.
[QUOTE=Warhol;23267036]hahahaha how? [/QUOTE] he's being sarcastic dude [QUOTE=Mingebox;23267148]He's probably one of those kids who felt like they learned more out of school because they spent all their time reading Wikipedia or something.[/QUOTE] he's probably one of those kids who is being sarcastic
[QUOTE=Doriol;23265394]free schooling is useless and only holds back children who want to learn[/QUOTE] huh what [editline]10:40PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Sigma-Lambda;23267608]he's being sarcastic dude[/QUOTE] i hope
He is [editline]10:02PM[/editline] my tarot cards say it is so
no I'm not public schools are full of worthless kids who couldn't care less about learning and all they do is pressure other kids into being just as useless. public school systems would rather keep these pieces of shit in their schools than get rid of them, because they'll lose money if they don't tl;dr: no child left behind, no child gets ahead
you are really good at this sarcasm thing [editline]10:36PM[/editline] do it again
white people rule [editline]12:39AM[/editline] no but really, public schooling is stupid
:golfclap:
[QUOTE=Doriol;23268460]white people rule [editline]12:39AM[/editline] no but really, public schooling is stupid[/QUOTE] i just realized your avatar says "fuck you"
[QUOTE=wonkadonk;23268527]i just realized your avatar says "fuck you"[/QUOTE] I just realised your avatar is sexually arousing and that I'm fingering myself
[QUOTE=Doriol;23268536]I just realised your avatar is sexually arousing and that I'm fingering myself[/QUOTE] carl sagan is responsible for 85% of all homoerotic feelings people feel whilst browsing the internet
Batman is responsible for another 7%
what about the remaining 56%
that belongs to billy mays
Well done on being a whore trying to get to me to make a point, Doriol, then completely ignoring it. Doriol, you're a troll. A good one, I gracefully admit. On a related note. Billy Mays didn't do shit, it's Jack Daniels fault.
[QUOTE=SteelReal;23264387]You're an ignorant hypocrite, you know that?[/QUOTE] I wasn't flaming YOU, you know that?
I like this thread. I like how at the end Doriol is like "Come on give me proof, you don't have any, you are telling me to get it for you, you know nothing about arguments" Then MrEndangeredis like "RAWRRRHH FINE! quotes quotes quotes" And then Doriol's like "... ... ... Oh hey they are talking about something else"
[QUOTE=SteelReal;23259096]In the Deceleration of Independence it states that every person has the same fundamental rights to life, liberty and the [b]pursuit[/b], not the guarantee of happiness.[/QUOTE] fundamental rights to life, liberty and the fundamental rights to life, liberty rights to life, liberty rights to life life you have a right to life. unless you get a treatable disease but cant pay for it.
Yay for shit news outlets!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.