Californian Supreme Court to hear Prop 8 case, delaying decision on gay marriage until 201
73 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Zeke129;28157394]I know nothing about her but she has thisispain's approval and that's enough for me.[/QUOTE]
She's very popular with my dad. Thisispain knows this in great detail.
[QUOTE=Habsburg;28157140]I would like to listen to bjork but I don't know where to start.[/QUOTE]
start with whatever her most popular videos are on youtube and if you like those then the first whole album you listen to should probably be debut
but then again i am a bjork newb and haven't heard all of her stuff so maybe you should wait for someone else's opinion
[editline]a[/editline]
also if you like bjork you should really check out fever ray because holy shit
Also in Iceland apparently.
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;28157467]start with whatever her most popular videos are on youtube and if you like those then the first whole album you listen to should probably be debut
but then again i am a bjork newb and haven't heard all of her stuff so maybe you should wait for someone else's opinion
[editline]a[/editline]
also if you like bjork you should really check out fever ray because holy shit[/QUOTE]
Yeah Fever Ray is sick music.
Rights are not really rights if you can take them away. Privileged is more correct
The right to marry whoever the hell you want isn't a privilege.
[editline]19th February 2011[/editline]
it's a right
[QUOTE=ineedateam1;28157820]Rights are not really rights if you can take them away. Privileged is more correct[/QUOTE]
you know this is a recursive definition of rights
"they are not rights because we don't call them rights"
[QUOTE=>VLN<;28156030]But see here, it was the people's vote. They voted to block gay marriage. It is their decision. If judges can then go and say what the [i]majority of the people[/i] voted for is invalid, that is a direct infringement on our rights. The people's decision may not be right, but it isn't the court's duty to repeal what the people have voted for.
[editline]19th February 2011[/editline]
We might as well be a dictatorship if that is the case.[/QUOTE]
I'm tempted to pull a Godwin.
[QUOTE=Habsburg;28157140]I would like to listen to bjork but I don't know where to start.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_bisjm3Bvuqs/SdCK7QqHOmI/AAAAAAAAAZc/AKZJbok23jQ/s400/bjork_debut1.jpg[/img]
debut
the further you get into her discography the more challenging and left-field her music gets
[QUOTE=Lebowski;28154063]NOT UNTIL 201 OH GOd[/QUOTE]
So this means the end of the world is near!
[QUOTE=thisispain;28159521][img_thumb]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_bisjm3Bvuqs/SdCK7QqHOmI/AAAAAAAAAZc/AKZJbok23jQ/s400/bjork_debut1.jpg[/img_thumb]
debut
the further you get into her discography the more challenging and left-field her music gets[/QUOTE]
Huh she reminds me of Ari Up
[img]http://www.crawdaddy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ari.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Bjork2.gif[/img]
whatever you say
Granted Bjork's voice is a lot stronger.
[QUOTE=Habsburg;28161230]Granted Bjork's voice is a lot stronger.[/QUOTE]
oh i thought you meant the image
i guess you could say that but ari up is way more reggae inspired in her styling, bjork not really
I always hated seeing those dumb Pro-Prop 8 signs around before it was passed; there was such a severe lack of anti-prop 8 signs.
Bunch of selfish assholes, taking away the rights of different people because it they don't like it very much. I wish it wouldn't take so long to get rid of this stupid thing.
Go California, god and I have to sit through college in this bullshit state
[QUOTE=Meatpuppet;28153667]"for liberty and justice for all" my ass.[/QUOTE]
hey hey
Illinois is working on the gay marriage laws all by itself!
[QUOTE=Lightened soul;28154488]I like how the only dumb that meatpuppets post got was from a user named "holy crusader"[/QUOTE]
Hello there spikes how is it going gir---
OH GOD FURRY AVATAR.
(INB4 ironymeter, somewhere on this page you can find a link to a profile of an account owned by me that has a furry avatar. It is very close by)
Oh shit, forgot spikes is a guy :smithicide:
[QUOTE=certified;28163155]Hello there spikes how is it going gir---
OH GOD FURRY AVATAR.
(INB4 ironymeter, somewhere on this page you can find a link to a profile of an account owned by me that has a furry avatar. It is very close by)
Oh shit, forgot spikes is a guy :smithicide:[/QUOTE]
What was the purpose of this post
[QUOTE=certified;28163155]Hello there spikes how is it going gir---
OH GOD FURRY AVATAR.
(INB4 ironymeter, somewhere on this page you can find a link to a profile of an account owned by me that has a furry avatar. It is very close by)
Oh shit, forgot spikes is a guy :smithicide:[/QUOTE]
couldn't find a picture of bjork to describe what i thought so here's thom yorke
[img]http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/135996/Thom+Yorke.jpg[/img]
Bugger that guy has a bad hairdo.
[QUOTE=Dr_Funk;28163409]Bugger that guy has a bad hairdo.[/QUOTE]
bad or original
[QUOTE=>VLN<;28156030]But see here, it was the people's vote. They voted to block gay marriage. It is their decision. If judges can then go and say what the [i]majority of the people[/i] voted for is invalid, that is a direct infringement on our rights. The people's decision may not be right, but it isn't the court's duty to repeal what the people have voted for.
[editline]19th February 2011[/editline]
We might as well be a dictatorship if that is the case.[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_K5ls3SJu5Qo/S1TKXr_2UCI/AAAAAAAACb8/0u7oP6ewXRc/s640/DrMartinLutherKingJr.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=>VLN<;28156030]But see here, it was the people's vote. They voted to block gay marriage. It is their decision. If judges can then go and say what the [i]majority of the people[/i] voted for is invalid, that is a direct infringement on our rights. The people's decision may not be right, but it isn't the court's duty to repeal what the people have voted for.
[editline]19th February 2011[/editline]
We might as well be a dictatorship if that is the case.[/QUOTE]
Checks and balances. This is built within the governmental system of this country- and for very good reasons (i.e blocking tyranny of the majority) Damn, learn how the system works.
[QUOTE=>VLN<;28156030]But see here, it was the people's vote. They voted to block gay marriage. It is their decision. If judges can then go and say what the [i]majority of the people[/i] voted for is invalid, that is a direct infringement on our rights. The people's decision may not be right, but it isn't the court's duty to repeal what the people have voted for.
[editline]19th February 2011[/editline]
We might as well be a dictatorship if that is the case.[/QUOTE]
No it fucking isn't, the tyranny of the majority of which you speak is the kind of shit that permits minorities to be abused. In a functioning democracy, the rights of the minorities are as protected as that of the majority. The constitution partially exists to prevent tyranny, whether that is from the government or a bunch of religious nutcases who can't mind their own business.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
