• Not being on Facebook is 'suspicious' - most likely insane or a mass murderer
    390 replies, posted
I do so hate small minded cunts. They're even worse than nerds.
I hate Facebook. That makes me what? A double mass-murderer? Oh, a politician.
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;37141854]Oh no. Nerds.[/QUOTE] Oh no. Some's projecting again!
-snip-
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;37143160]I do so hate small minded cunts. They're even worse than nerds.[/QUOTE] oh my god
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;37143160]I do so hate small minded cunts. They're even worse than nerds.[/QUOTE] I have no idea why you're continuing with this. You're just digging yourself deeper and deeper into the hole you've dug with this argument.
[QUOTE=wickedplayer494;37153337]I have no idea why you're continuing with this. You're just digging yourself deeper and deeper into the hole you've dug with this argument.[/QUOTE] the statement is just so ironic to him it hurts
Reminds me of what I told this one girl I met yesterday: Today it's isn't normal to not be stalking someone on Facebook. Reminds me: I should probably add her on FB, because we got along way better then our friends came to expect.
Bullshit, Breivik was on Facebook. I clearly remember his account being linked here almost immediately after the attacks.
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;37141063]Will all the "Not facebook equals killer" just fuck OFF? That's not the point of the article. You are not "most likely" insane or a mass murderer for not using Facebook. That's just the shitty strawman that was put forth by the OP, and immediately and gladly assumed to be the actual case by everyone in the thread. Facebook is a big thing, and it's helped me further MY social life. Noone can refute my personal experience. I want others who are very skeptical to give it an honest, legitimate try, and not be turned off the instant they see a meme.[/QUOTE] How much are you being paid to post in this thread Please be honest
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;37157384]How much are you being paid to post in this thread Please be honest[/QUOTE] The only payment I need is my inflated self-gratitude. [QUOTE=SIRIUS;37153550]the statement is just so ironic to him it hurts[/QUOTE] Aren't I such a crowd pleaser.
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;37141063]Will all the "Not facebook equals killer" just fuck OFF? That's not the point of the article. You are not "most likely" insane or a mass murderer for not using Facebook. That's just the shitty strawman that was put forth by the OP, and immediately and gladly assumed to be the actual case by everyone in the thread. Facebook is a big thing, and it's helped me further MY social life. Noone can refute my personal experience. I want others who are very skeptical to give it an honest, legitimate try, and not be turned off the instant they see a meme.[/QUOTE] [B]'not having a Facebook account could be the first sign that you are a mass murderer.' young people shouldn't date anyone who isn't on Facebook. accused theater shooter James Holmes and Norwegian mass murder Anders Behring Breivik have common ground in their lack of Facebook profiles. Facebook has become such a pervasive force in modern society that increasing numbers of employers, and even some psychologists, believe people who aren't on social networking sites are 'suspicious.' 'If you’re of a certain age and you meet someone who you are about to go to bed with, and that person doesn’t have a Facebook page, you may be getting a false name. It could be some kind of red flag,' he says. Psychologists have noted that Holmes, along with several noted mass murderers, have lacked any real friends. And this is what the argument boils down to: It's the suspicion that not being on Facebook, which has become so normal among young adults, is a sign that you're abnormal and dysfunctional, or even dangerous, ways[/B] "not the point of the article" and you've clearly stated there wasn't any better social networking way and then disagree'd with yourself by saying there are alternatives? And did you read the article? [I]It's the daily mail and you're agreeing with it making sense. with out even agreeing with it[/I] let me even show you the actual articles name, the one you didn't even read [URL="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2184658/Is-joining-Facebook-sign-youre-psychopath-Some-employers-psychologists-say-suspicious.html?ICO=most_read_module"]Is not joining Facebook a sign you're a psychopath? Some employers and psychologists say staying away from social media is 'suspicious'[/URL] [QUOTE=Elecbullet;37141833]I don't even give a shit about being a killer.[/QUOTE] watch out guys. Elec is a killer, and he's not giving a shit about it. [QUOTE=Elecbullet;37143160]I do so hate small minded cunts. They're even worse than nerds.[/QUOTE] self hating killer that is [QUOTE=Elecbullet;37157429]The only payment I need is my inflated self-gratitude. Aren't I such a crowd pleaser.[/QUOTE] Self hating killer who is somehow insanely narcissistic yet suicidal by digging his own grave. you do realize I'm doing this to make you read what you're saying right? look at yourself please. Just stop the digging.
wow elecbullet get yourself out of that electronic fantasy land in your head [B]edit:[/B] no seriously why are you so emotional or irrational about some silly social networking website
[QUOTE=J!NX;37159454][B]'not having a Facebook account could be the first sign that you are a mass murderer.' young people shouldn't date anyone who isn't on Facebook. accused theater shooter James Holmes and Norwegian mass murder Anders Behring Breivik have common ground in their lack of Facebook profiles. Facebook has become such a pervasive force in modern society that increasing numbers of employers, and even some psychologists, believe people who aren't on social networking sites are 'suspicious.' 'If you’re of a certain age and you meet someone who you are about to go to bed with, and that person doesn’t have a Facebook page, you may be getting a false name. It could be some kind of red flag,' he says. Psychologists have noted that Holmes, along with several noted mass murderers, have lacked any real friends. And this is what the argument boils down to: It's the suspicion that not being on Facebook, which has become so normal among young adults, is a sign that you're abnormal and dysfunctional, or even dangerous, ways[/B] "not the point of the article" and you've clearly stated there wasn't any better social networking way and then disagree'd with yourself by saying there are alternatives? And did you read the article? [I]It's the daily mail and you're agreeing with it making sense. with out even agreeing with it[/I] let me even show you the actual articles name, the one you didn't even read [URL="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2184658/Is-joining-Facebook-sign-youre-psychopath-Some-employers-psychologists-say-suspicious.html?ICO=most_read_module"]Is not joining Facebook a sign you're a psychopath? Some employers and psychologists say staying away from social media is 'suspicious'[/URL] you do realize I'm doing this to make you read what you're saying right? look at yourself please. Just stop the digging.[/QUOTE] I was going to defend my view of the article but fuck it, I will let myself admit defeat with that regard. Upon rereading the article does seem to be more about mass murderers than I originally imagined. And the Daily Mail does, from what Facepunch tells me, have a history of being a crock of shit. I won't bother to defend them about this, though I will maintain taht the first post of the thread was wrought with strawman and exaggeration of the newspaper's claims without a doubt, and this prevailed throughout the thread. [I]My[/I] argument has merely been that non-Facebookers tend to be antisocial, and would be benefited by using the service. I downplayed anything about murder, hence "I don't even give a shit about being a killer". I'll stick to that.
no dude you're just sticking to contemporary textbook social stereotypes that more or less hold nothing in the real world let's not forget to mention that you're arguing for an source that hardly meets any professional standard i see no reliable sources for this article that are sourced, no college studies or psychological studies, zippo
hey did you see this post [QUOTE=Elecbullet;37159770]I was going to defend my view of the article but fuck it, I will let myself admit defeat with that regard. Upon rereading the article does seem to be more about mass murderers than I originally imagined. And the Daily Mail does, from what Facepunch tells me, have a history of being a crock of shit. I won't bother to defend them about this, though I will maintain taht the first post of the thread was wrought with strawman and exaggeration of the newspaper's claims without a doubt, and this prevailed throughout the thread. [I]My[/I] argument has merely been that non-Facebookers tend to be antisocial, and would be benefited by using the service. I downplayed anything about murder, hence "I don't even give a shit about being a killer". I'll stick to that.[/QUOTE] i admitted I was wrong on the article see where it says that
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;37160027]hey did you see this post i admitted I was wrong on the article see where it says that[/QUOTE] okay but: [QUOTE=Me][B] no dude you're just sticking to contemporary textbook social stereotypes that more or less hold nothing in the real world[/B][/QUOTE] V [QUOTE=You][I][B]My argument has merely been that non-Facebookers tend to be antisocial, and would be benefited by using the service. I downplayed anything about murder, hence "I don't even give a shit about being a killer". I'll stick to that.[/B][/I][/QUOTE]
In my experience it has been true that non-Facebookers have not been from the highest tiers of society. It has also been true that joining Facebook has been good for me. Perhaps I can't verify either of those claims beyond meaningless personal experience, though there might be some site somewhere that would give a statistic to back me up on one. But it worked out in my case.
Hey guys remember that cool site called Myspace?
Oh yeah. It's called my_____ now iirc.
The ultimate "[I]seems legit[/I]".
i guess i better turn myself in to the cops so i dont go on a rampage
how do you blindly defend an article like that and never have actually read it seriously
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.