Innocent Man Accused Of Child Pornography After Neighbor Pirates His WiFi

[Dr_Funk]

[QUOTE=Sherow_Xx;29526069]Even with the addition it still 'makes no fucking sense'.

And by the way, you do know that the information could be twisted, right? Nowadays, people classify "child pornography" as anything. "cp" can range from pictures of a tiny baby being double penetrated and tied up, to a picture of a clothed teenager in something that looks like a pose, taken by the teenager herself.[/QUOTE]

Define clothed - otherwise I might see CP everytime I access Facebook.

[Sharo]

Clothed can be anything to just enough to cover private parts or fully clothed as in this clothed:
[img]http://bethleintz.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/01/25/grace_snowsuit.jpg[/img]

Usually it depends on the context. Like if there's a dick in the picture, it's CP. Even if it has been edited in, it can be CP. Sometimes (too often) people classify drawings as CP.
And if you have 10 pictures and 3 of them can be classified as CP, the rest will be CP aswell.

Basically, the definition of child pornography nowadays is this:
A picture, drawing or video that sexually excites, pleases or is possessed by a pedophile.

EDIT:
So yes, if you're a pedophile then you see CP every time you access Facebook.

Scratch the context bit.
What is cp depends on the context and/or intention of possession.

[FFStudios]

[QUOTE=Motherfucker;29524192]Just in case you forgot what child pornography is you creepy piece of shit

even if he was innocent they had a fucking good reason to suspect him, and frankly I wouldn't care if they threw him down the stairs and he was guilty.[/QUOTE]

no you dumb fuck it's not children getting fucked

cp is a very broad category of shit

[dass]

[quote]The Sarasota, Fla. man, for example, who got a similar visit from the FBI last year after someone on a boat docked in a marina outside his building used a potato chip can as an antenna to boost his wireless signal...[/quote]
[img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_eP-TQH6WbX0/SbibhGB8tjI/AAAAAAAAHgg/x_VHuw-C02M/s400/Burn+Notice+-+Lesser+Evil+-+Jeffrey+Donovan+as+Michael+Westen.jpg[/img]
[img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2468/3643001220_82ea290af4.jpg[/img]
Suspicious...

[Fetret]

[QUOTE=DrLuke;29444236]Well, that's why you either secure your wireless, or just don't use your computer at all.[/QUOTE]

I know this got a ton of agrees but there was a wonderful article by Bruce Schneier on why encrypting your wireless access is wrong and actually might be more dangerous than not doing so. Basically it boiled down to wireless encryption is not secure and can be broken. And if it is broken it would be far more difficult to explain to the authorities how your "secure" access got compromised compared to "I didn't have any password and my pedophile neighbor must have used my connection as well". I'll try to find it now.

[editline]30th April 2011[/editline]

There it is:
[url]http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/01/my_open_wireles.html[/url]

[Dori]

[QUOTE=Fetret;29530836]I know this got a ton of agrees but there was a wonderful article by Bruce Schneier on why encrypting your wireless access is wrong and actually might be more dangerous than not doing so. Basically it boiled down to wireless encryption is not secure and can be broken. And if it is broken it would be far more difficult to explain to the authorities how your "secure" access got compromised compared to "I didn't have any password and my pedophile neighbor must have used my connection as well". I'll try to find it now.
[/QUOTE]

In that case, wouldn't it be better to make your password admin123 or passw0rd or something easy to guess like that, rather than making it completely open?

[Fetret]

[QUOTE=Sanius;29530919]In that case, wouldn't it be better to make your password admin123 or passw0rd or something easy to guess like that, rather than making it completely open?[/QUOTE]

Not really because would the law enforcement be initially bothered to check what your password was/is? All they're going to notice is that it is encrypted. I can see what you mean but again I feel no password coupled with a MAC filter (which I know can be easily fooled) is the best choice.

[Biotoxsin]

[QUOTE=Saxon;29447995]That can't be right[/QUOTE]

I agree, if every picture was to average at around 5 megabytes that would what, 50 terrabytes or so?