Muslims suspected in bombing a store in Paris after the release of French Magazine drawing of Mohamm - Polidicks

[QUOTE=TheTalon;37728529]I always wondered why with all these religions, with the all knowing, all mighty, judge of judges, owner of paradise, that any of us/you religious people that do this, must try to enforce your shit upon others, no matter what. Being Gay's bad, so no we're not allowing you to have these rights because the bible says so. Well fuck your Bible. Why not just let your gods sort everyone out when they die and show up at the pearly gates, rather than get all violent and kill them? Surely he's capable of doing it on his own he's a big boy, right? He doesn't need your help. Even Muhammad can probably handle a couple people calling him names[/QUOTE] indoctrination in the name of religion. religious leaders have cunningly used this for thousands of years, and it won't stop yet

Harm innocent people because you don't like how other people don't believe the same as you. Makes perfect sense...

[QUOTE=Bobie;37725794] 70 percent of recent terror plots in the United States have been foiled by help from Muslim Americans. [/QUOTE] Probably brought them in as consultants. [sub][sub][sub][sub] I'm kidding don't bomb me ;-; [/sub][/sub][/sub][/sub]

thank you French magazine

The cartoon isn't even that good. [IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/134809396242.jpg[/IMG] [editline]20th September 2012[/editline] The film that embraces the musluman world And Mohammed says; My butt! You always loved my butt! And the one with the star says: Mohammed; A new star is born!

[QUOTE=Riller;37729384]The cartoon isn't even that good. [IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/134809396242.jpg[/IMG] [editline]20th September 2012[/editline] The film that embraces the musluman world And Mohammed says; My butt! You always loved my butt! And the one with the star says: Mohammed; A new star is born![/QUOTE] ho hoh ho ho ho ho c'est genial!

But why the fuck does the title says that 4 were killed ? Vasili is full of shit or what ?

[QUOTE=Mechanical43;37730117]But why the fuck does the title says that 4 were killed ? Vasili is full of shit or what ?[/QUOTE] No, that's just people not actually reading an article for themselves. Not the first time I've seen people on the internet not actually read an article and just start posting based on what they read in the title. It's four people wounded, at least that's what the linked bloomberg article says.

[QUOTE=proch;37725583]How about anonymously painting a giant picture of their prophet fucking a goat and secretly hang it from one of their tallest buildings?[/QUOTE] yeah incite more violence for your childish gratification, nice idea. You get right on that. [editline]20th September 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=legolover122;37725622] You don't see christians trying to kill people when someone insults their god.[/QUOTE] Yeah you're right, they do the kinder and more respectable thing and bomb abortion clinics. [editline]20th September 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Chekko;37726388]"I fucking hate Christianity!" - x100 agrees "I fucking hate Religion!" - x200 agrees "I fucking hate Isla-" x10000 dumb, user banned. Reply: "You're so ignorant! We must accept religion!" etc etc[/QUOTE] Oh you poor little victimised Islamaphobe. [editline]20th September 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Primigenes;37727363]I have that urge to say something stupid like France has this coming. And it only because of the few stupid cartoonist who think infuriating the Muslim extremist by depicting there prophet is funny. Its like they're stupid I can care less about the whole "HURR LETS TEACH PEOPLE THAT WE GONNA DO WHATEVER WE WANT" These extremist are going to endanger the lives of people and it doesn't help that your trying to piss them off. This isn't a joke[/QUOTE] I think it should be legal to punch people who say "hurr"

I predict that this will probably have a heavy impact on the French peoples view on immigration and cultural tolerance. I think that due to France emphasis on free-speech and cultural unity, they won't see this attack as a reason to be more tolerant of Islam, but as a reason to keep Islam out of their country.

I'm changing the title, from killed to injured..

Any Muslim who resort to murder and terrorism is not a real Muslim. I never consider anyone who is associate with terrorist to be Muslim. I suppose if a Christian man plants a bomb, he isn't considered a terrorist but a lunatic. You westerners double standards definition of criminals puzzles me.

[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;37733622] Oh you poor little victimised Islamaphobe. [/QUOTE] Using the stupid word 'islamophobe' doesn't give you the moral high ground.

[QUOTE=BCell;37733952]Any Muslim who resort to murder and terrorism is not a real Muslim. I never consider anyone who is associate with terrorist to be Muslim. [/QUOTE] They don't consider you Muesli either.

[QUOTE=Terminutter;37725722] Also, firebombing abortion clinics in the US.[/QUOTE] Holy fuck the irony.

[QUOTE=dunkace;37725455]Once again fulfilling their stereotype.[/QUOTE] It's an endless feedback loop The extremists see islamophobic behaviour, they do crazy extremist stuff in response, which feeds islamophobic behaviour more, which makes them do more crazy extremist stuff, which... etc.

I was waiting for word "islamophobe" to get popular around here. There's no such thing. People who dislike Islam almost always have some reasons. And some Muslims being unpredictable is one of the most popular. [b]Edit:[/b] I see dumbs down there, and have seen noDachi defending nonsense before, but anyone else care to actually voice their opinions?

Seriously, this is nonsense. To be one of these people you either have to be mentally deranged or extremely stupid. I mean what the fuck are they doing? Defending Allah? This is completely contradictory to their own religion if they're calling themselves "Muslims."

[QUOTE=gudman;37726841]Apparently Hitler was pissed off because someone made fun of Jesus.[/QUOTE] So that's the only reason for Muslim oppresion. Good job.

[QUOTE=AK'z;37736424]So that's the only reason for Muslim oppresion. Good job.[/QUOTE] I believe you have misquoted something. That's no reason for Muslim oppresion (and I don't see it anywhere around the world either, 'cept maybe for some African radical Christian countries).

Or India, or Eastern Europe.

[QUOTE=gudman;37728251]It's not THAT straight-forward example. Concept of "provoking" is what I really aimed at. No one's provoking anyone. You can not provoke human being to kill someone else. You just can not. If he still kills someone and then blames you - it's either he actually is an animal, or he's using you as an excuse. That's the one and only weapon of terrorists and extremists - fear that someone can get hurt or even killed. One just can bow down to it, that's a neverending story. Don't talk about Mohammed or someone might get hurt. Don't allow gay-marriages or someone might get hurt. Don't allow your women wearing mini-skirts or someone might get hurt - that was a true story in my country. Then what? Who the hell are they to dictate people what to do? Aggressive sociopaths - but that just means they're in dire need of returning back to lands of their origin, where everything is like they want. Are they just so offended they shit on laws of their own religion (the very reason they're offended)? Either way, there should be no tolerance for such things. Modern society has no obligation to follow and respect the medieval rules of barbarians.[/QUOTE] Deciding not to do X because it could cause problems doesn't have any bearing on your right and ability to do X. Rights, responsibility, and control go hand in hand ya know. Just because you have a right to something doesn't mean that you should just use it without thought all the time, or it can't do any harm. I mean, I have the right to go and sleep with vmy friend's girlfriend, doesn't mean it's ok

[QUOTE=NoDachi;37736833]Or India, or Eastern Europe.[/QUOTE] Oh yeah, forgot good old India, which is itself in a pre-historic era. But how are Muslims oppressed in Eastern Europe? Are they outlawed, or something? Are they forbidden of practicing their religion? [editline]20th September 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=RobbL;37736836]Deciding not to do X because it could cause problems doesn't have any bearing on your right and ability to do X. Rights, responsibility, and control go hand in hand ya know. Just because you have a right to something doesn't mean that you should just use it without thought all the time, or it can't do any harm. I mean, I have the right to go and sleep with vmy friend's girlfriend, doesn't mean it's ok[/QUOTE] That's a bad example, you know? Or if you want to use this example, you must mention that your friend have slept with your girlfriend too. And some other friend's girlfriends. Radical muslims are never slow to label jews as a capital offence to Allah, to label Christians as pagans etc. To label gays and lesbians as abominations that should be purged. To call western women "whores" because they don't wear glorified garbage bags known as burqa and dare to show themselves publicly with no men overwatching them.

[QUOTE=gudman;37736879] That's a bad example, you know? Or if you want to use this example, you must mention that your friend have slept with your girlfriend too.[/QUOTE] Oh and that makes it ok?

[QUOTE=RobbL;37737006]Oh and that makes it ok?[/QUOTE] Yes it does. If you're not too concerned about your friend sleeping with your girlfirend (and all your other friends aren't too), you have every right to expect that this particular friend won't mind it too. Or if you know he might flip shit - then you should do it anyway. That's just and does not break any laws. That's stupid example though, we're actually talking about matters far outside of this level of privacy. Muslims take advantage of our freedom of speech to criticise and ridicule others, but when it goes around they flip shit. Not the way to go.

[QUOTE=gudman;37737075]Yes it does. If you're not too concerned about your friend sleeping with your girlfirend (and all your other friends aren't too), you have every right to expect that this particular friend won't mind it too. Or if you know he might flip shit - then you should do it anyway. That's just and does not break any laws. [/QUOTE] If both parties are fine with it then obviously it's ok. However, if you're drawing a parallel between this analogy and the issue at hand here, then both parties would be against the idea of the other one sleeping with their girlfriend [editline]20th September 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=gudman;37737075] That's stupid example though, we're actually talking about matters far outside of this level of privacy. Muslims take advantage of our freedom of speech to criticise and ridicule others, but when it goes around they flip shit. Not the way to go.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Deciding not to do X because it could cause problems doesn't have any bearing on your right and ability to do X. Rights, responsibility, and control go hand in hand ya know.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=gudman;37736879]Oh yeah, forgot good old India, which is itself in a pre-historic era. But how are Muslims oppressed in Eastern Europe? Are they outlawed, or something? Are they forbidden of practicing their religion?[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.kevincoombs.co.uk/bw/massgrave.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=gudman;37736707]I believe you have misquoted something. That's no reason for Muslim oppresion (and I don't see it anywhere around the world either, 'cept maybe for some African radical Christian countries).[/QUOTE] Don't start thinking this is the only time Muslims have oppressed. Look up the "Moghul" era. Torturing people to convert to religion. Medieval but still relevent.

[QUOTE=RobbL;37737164]If both parties are fine with it then obviously it's ok. However, if you're drawing a parallel between this analogy and the issue at hand here, then both parties would be against the idea of the other one sleeping with their girlfriend [/QUOTE] That's why I found this example to be stupid in the first place and then confirmed it. One party (Christians, Jews, LGBT, women) are all fine with Muslims idiocy, they just don't care most of the time. The other party is split - most of Muslims just facepalming, and minorities going all ape. Minorities should be restrained in such cases. [QUOTE=NoDachi;37737232][img]http://www.kevincoombs.co.uk/bw/massgrave.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] That's Bosnia, undeclared civil war, nothing to do with oppression of Muslims.

The fact that Islam, Judaism and Christianity are all tied in together just confuses me even more.