Obama praises homosexual relationships, conservatives get their panties in a twist - Polidicks

[QUOTE=zombiefreak;20827133]If Bush had not spent so much and the war had not lasted so long then we would be out of the recession now.[/quote] why do you think the US economy fell so easily? [quote]The US was in a shit position at the time because of FDR.[/QUOTE] lol, no, not at all... holy shit, you are clueless. Maybe because of the depression? you know, the one the conservatives caused?

[QUOTE=zombiefreak;20825858]I think that homosexuals flaunt their sexuality too much. Who cares if you like men?[/QUOTE] Who cares if you don't like gay people. You flaunt it too much.

[QUOTE=Trotsky;20827286][B]why do you think the US economy fell so easily?[/B] lol, no, not at all... holy shit, you are clueless. Maybe because of the depression? you know, the one the conservatives caused?[/QUOTE] Because the economy is a delicate thing. I am speaking out of my ass for the great depression though.

[QUOTE=Trotsky;20827286]why do you think the US economy fell so easily? lol, no, not at all... holy shit, you are clueless. Maybe because of the depression? you know, the one the conservatives caused?[/QUOTE] why dont you shut up, your a communist you guys dont believe in economy, only grain, farming, stalin, corn, stalin, and more farming. did i mention stalin? ronald reagen was a super genius who we should all look up to. i propose texas BOE have two hundred pages dedicated to Reagen. [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Gdp29-41.svg[/img]

not really. uh what? [editline]05:02AM[/editline] [QUOTE=lolwutdude;20827380]why dont you shut up, your a communist you guys dont believe in economy, only grain, farming, stalin, corn, stalin, and more farming. did i mention stalin? ronald reagen was a super genius who we should all look up to. i propose texas BOE have two hundred pages dedicated to Reagen. [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Gdp29-41.svg[/img][/QUOTE] we farm stalin

[QUOTE=zombiefreak;20827068][QUOTE=Zeke129;20826905]Reagen set the groundwork for the shitheap that your economy is today.[/QUOTE] No that was Bush. He happened to be in economic adjustment, and spent money at the wrong time. [/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3y3QoFnqZc[/media]

[QUOTE=Lambeth;20827474][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3y3QoFnqZc[/media][/QUOTE] And lowered taxes at the wrong time, and didn't have a plan for iraq, ect.

[QUOTE=zombiefreak;20827133] [QUOTE=lolwutdude;20827093]i support hiternomics and tojonomics [img]http://econ161.berkeley.edu/Graphics/gif_files/PageMill_Resources/image11.gif[/img][/QUOTE] The US was in a shit position at the time because of FDR.[/QUOTE] FDR wasn't the president for all of the depression bro. [editline]09:16PM[/editline] [QUOTE=zombiefreak;20827533]And lowered taxes at the wrong time, and didn't have a plan for iraq, ect.[/QUOTE] I was actually talking about the Reagen bit

[QUOTE=Lambeth;20827545]FDR wasn't the president for all of the depression bro.[/QUOTE] March 1933-April 1945. Hitler was in power for the same amount of time, +- 1 or 2 months.

[QUOTE=Lambeth;20827545] I was actually talking about the Reagen bit[/QUOTE] If it was Reagen then why was there a sharp increase in the GDP and national reserves during Clinton?

FDR was president for most of depression, I'll admit that, but judging by that graph FDR was good for the US.

The original post in this thread was about Obama saying good things about same-sex relationships. The past few pages have been a debate about Reaganomics. Diagram: [IMG]http://imgur.com/PRPz5.jpg[/IMG] [editline]04:22AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Lambeth;20827636]FDr was president for most of depression, I'll admit that, but judging by that graph FDR was good for the US.[/QUOTE] I think that was his point.

[QUOTE=PrismatexV8;20827639] [QUOTE=Lambeth;20827636]FDr was president for most of depression, I'll admit that, but judging by that graph FDR was good for the US.[/QUOTE] I think that was his point.[/QUOTE] Wasn't Zombiefreak's point. [editline]09:25PM[/editline] Unless the meaning of shit changed when I was looking in the other direction.

[QUOTE=Lambeth;20827670]Wasn't Zombiefreak's point. [editline]09:25PM[/editline] Unless the meaning of shit changed when I was looking in the other direction.[/QUOTE] No, but lolwutdude posted that graph.

I thought it was obvious I was addressing Zombiefreak's comment.

Let's get back on the topic of gay people and how they should have full civil rights.

Gay people should have the same civil rights as straight people because they are awesome.

but according to zombiefreak, they should shut up.

I have proof. Look at Neil Patrick Harris. [editline]09:37PM[/editline] Ellen DeGeneres too

[QUOTE=Trotsky;20827781]but according to zombiefreak, they should shut up.[/QUOTE] From my experiences they should quiet down.

[QUOTE=Lambeth;20827820]I have proof. Look at Neil Patrick Harris.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://imgur.com/wkzee.jpg[/IMG] NPH is king of page 9. [b]Edit:[/b] Damn, zombiefreak ninja'd me. He's now queen.

Zombiefreak, you're fucking ignorant. For your own sake, shut up. Reagenomics is bad. Lower taxes does not mean good. Look at countries with better life standards and better healthcare than the US, they have high taxes. Actually, fuck explaining economics to you, you're fucking 13. You joined this forum when you were 10. No one here should take you seriously. [editline]09:41PM[/editline] [QUOTE=zombiefreak;20827846]From my experiences they should quiet down.[/QUOTE] Because you know gay people all go around telling everyone how fucking gay they are. They don't. A lot of the people you know might be gay, and you'd never know. Because, guess what? They don't shove it in peoples faces.

[img]http://blog.heritage.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/2009_chart_book_pr_chart.jpg[/img] As far as I know, it isn't Obama's fault that his side is so bad

[QUOTE=zombiefreak;20827068]No that was Bush. He happened to be in economic adjustment, and spent money at the wrong time.[/quote] As much as I hate advocating for the man, Moore's "Capitalism: A Love Story" explained Reagen's fuckups in nice simple words for a 13-year-old such as yourself. Just don't bother with the rest of the movie, it wasn't all that great.

That's a bit unfair. Why the fuck did they average it?

[QUOTE=Gummylamb;20827915] As far as I know, it isn't Obama's fault that his side is so bad[/QUOTE] While Obama hasn't done anything really, it really isn't his fault he inherited a shithole in terms of debt. [editline]09:45PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Zeke129;20827928]As much as I hate advocating for the man, Moore's "Capitalism: A Love Story" explained Reagen's fuckups in nice simple words for a 13-year-old such as yourself. Just don't bother with the rest of the movie, it wasn't all that great.[/QUOTE] I have that to watch right now, but I'm too lazy too because the thought of Micheal Moors blubbering vagina on my screen is too much for me to take sometimes.

[QUOTE=Lambeth;20827939]That's a bit unfair. Why the fuck did they average it?[/QUOTE] Because it's the Heritage Foundation. Look at 2008 compared to 2009 and I guarantee you it'd be closer. Bush has it easy on that graph because he was able to ride Clinton's surplus.

[QUOTE=Gummylamb;20827915][img]http://blog.heritage.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/2009_chart_book_pr_chart.jpg[/img] As far as I know, it isn't Obama's fault that his side is so bad[/QUOTE] christ, does anyone here know how clinton managed to do that? thats impressive

[QUOTE=lolwutdude;20828034]christ, does anyone here know how clinton managed to do that? thats impressive[/QUOTE] For one, not cutting taxes for the rich.

[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;20827942]I have that to watch right now, but I'm too lazy too because the thought of Micheal Moors blubbering vagina on my screen is too much for me to take sometimes.[/QUOTE] He didn't pull enough of his trademark stunts to make the movie entertaining, but it was still fascinating. And he didn't pull shit out of his ass this time.