Tits declared serious business as royal couple make criminal complaint over topless photos - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Paramud;37689798]The photographer is just doing his job. He's paid to get pictures that'll bring in ratings, so that's what he does. If anything, he should be fired for using a shitty camera. [editline]oh hamburgers[/editline] And the duchess should ease up about this. I can obviously understand not wanting someone to take photos of you against your will. But once they're out (the pictures,) there's not much you can do about it that won't just bring more attention to it.[/QUOTE] No, i don't care what his job is, just because he's payed to do something wrong doesn't mean it's right or he isn't scum.

[QUOTE=znk666;37696869]Oh no someone famous was tanning topless,oh the shame! I never understood why this is such a big deal,so half of the world will see her tits she should be proud of it![/QUOTE] that's really easy for a man to say

[QUOTE=Dori;37699175]that's really easy for a man to say[/QUOTE] Wrong, i'm a guy and my opinion is quite contrary.

[QUOTE=luckycandy;37699044]No, i don't care what his job is, just because he's payed to do something wrong doesn't mean it's right or he isn't scum.[/QUOTE] Do you guys just not read my posts before responding to them or something? I never once said that what a paparazzi does is right.

[QUOTE=luckycandy;37699044]No, i don't care what his job is, just because he's payed to do something wrong doesn't mean it's right or he isn't scum.[/QUOTE] I remember when some paps hassled Quentin Tarantino and they nearly got their backsides kicked. [editline]17th September 2012[/editline] Or Hugh Grant and Grant told the guy he was scum and he should get a better job and the guy cried [editline]17th September 2012[/editline] Or one jumped in front of the moving car of Robbie Williams and broke his leg just trying to get a picture. What a fucking idiot. [editline]17th September 2012[/editline] The fact is a paparazzi job is scum, get a different job for gods sake. But arguing over the moral implications is totally irrelevant. It's done.

[QUOTE=Dori;37699175]that's really easy for a man to say[/QUOTE] Why? Do men not have any private parts?

[QUOTE=Paramud;37699671]Do you guys just not read my posts before responding to them or something? I never once said that what a paparazzi does is right.[/QUOTE] So why are you defending them, saying it's their job and shit when it actually isn't, they've taken the initiative to make it their job themselves.

I'm not really sure how these paper articles could be relevant to anything. "ROYAL SCANDAL: KATE MIDDLETON HAS BREASTS" Also for all the "meh-ers" this is what a fairly average pair of tits looks like. This isn't the hot girls megathread, get used to it.

I'm only "meh"ing because the photographer did a shit job. The photographer should get his shit slapped for stalking the woman anyway, regardless of who she is, but if you're going to take unsolicited photos at least don't make it look like you're shaking a camera from the 1960s.

[QUOTE=dgg;37700962]So why are you defending them, saying it's their job and shit when it actually isn't, they've taken the initiative to make it their job themselves.[/QUOTE] Allow me to quote one of my earlier posts you seem to have not read. [QUOTE=Paramud;37693919]It's his job to take photographs that will sell. Nude royalty sells damn well. ... I'm just pointing out that he probably did [i]not[/i] do this out of a sexual desire, which people seem to be assuming.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ajrhug;37696640]its just an incredibly grainy picture of a useless flesh sack on someones cheet tho like if its a privacy thing yeah but like its still kind of a public place and also paparazi who follow famous people everywhere????[/QUOTE] It was in the middle of a fucking forest and some people don't like having their flesh plastered over magazines and newspapers so some cunt without morals can get some sales by invasion of privacy. Seriously can we stop defending these people? It was a guy who has basically resigned himself to taking pictures of people and being a cunt to feed himself and a bunch of cunts publishing the other cunts pictures so that other cunts will buy their cunt paper.

[QUOTE=luckycandy;37699330]Wrong, i'm a guy and my opinion is quite contrary.[/QUOTE] what? he wasn't saying all guys were pigs like him, just that it was easy

[QUOTE=Paramud;37703034]Allow me to quote one of my earlier posts you seem to have not read.[/QUOTE] And neither of those arguments makes sense as I've already pointed out (since I specifically quoted both of those and replied to them). Nobody called the photographer a creep, and you never defended him for not being a creep before that post, before that you were all like "it's his job, she should just deal with it now that it's done, she shouldn't have been outside if she didn't want this to happen". So stop backpedaling on that.