[QUOTE=Amez;37616734]This makes me wonder what sorts of things Google has hidden away in their 'Googlenet'.[/QUOTE]
More porn then you could imagine
[QUOTE=duno;37620395]So it's basically a high-speed switch for their datacentres? Isn't that normal?[/QUOTE]
Yeah, but the fact it's unique to google makes it interesting.
It might contain the knowledge of our origin, it might be origin itself
I know the guy who wanted to buy it was probably an amateur or something but I want to believe it was a jealous apple/microsoft/amazon employee eager to reverse engineer that shit and find out all of google's secrets
free internet
I bet it's a switch.
And I bet they're just fiber optic ports.
Big todo over nothing.
[t]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb58374/epicrapbattlesofhistory/images/9/9f/HAL_9000.jpg[/t]
[I]Dave.... Could you please plug that back in? I'm not sure what it is you are trying to do...[/I]
[QUOTE=Marik Bentusi;37617123]Well that's kind of a letdown.[/QUOTE]
"I found a switch and all I got was this t-shirt
[tab]sponsored by Google[/tab]"
It does seem kind of weird that they are using their own physical connections, I would have though the usual RJ-45 terminations would be cheap enough for a company like Google to use massively with no worry. Unless their connector has some features that they rely on. Could also be a security thing I guess.
[editline]edited[/editline]
Let's just ignore that RJ-45 bit, totally forgot that this is most like a fiber switch for a minute...
WHOEVER WINS
WE LOSE
ALSO WE GET GOOD AS FUCK INTERNET
[QUOTE=hexpunK;37622819]"I found a switch and all I got was this t-shirt
[tab]sponsored by Google[/tab]"
It does seem kind of weird that they are using their own physical connections, I would have though the usual RJ-45 terminations would be cheap enough for a company like Google to use massively with no worry. Unless their connector has some features that they rely on. Could also be a security thing I guess.[/QUOTE]
RJ-45 is too low-bandwidth. you're just looking at a proprietary fiber connector, its not a particularly unusual thing for large networks like Google has going.
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;37623003]RJ-45 is too low-bandwidth. you're just looking at a proprietary fiber connector, its not a particularly unusual thing for large networks like Google has going.[/QUOTE]
Shit :v: Didn't think about fiber for some reason when I posted that. That does make more sense then in that case.
I still don't know what I'm looking at here. I must've read the article 3 times, could someone explain this to me?
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;37623003]RJ-45 is too low-bandwidth. you're just looking at a proprietary fiber connector, its not a particularly unusual thing for large networks like Google has going.[/QUOTE]
The connector (It's 8P8C too, not RJ-45) has nothing to do with the bandwidth, Ethernet goes up to 10Gbps (Which is what the device apparently runs at). That said, the connectors are proprietary, but I don't think they're fibre (The front pictures show pins, and the shot of the board shows them being wired directly onto the board, not optical components)
[QUOTE=TheDecryptor;37624464]The connector (It's 8P8C too, not RJ-45) has nothing to do with the bandwidth, Ethernet goes up to 10Gbps (Which is what the device apparently runs at). That said, the connectors are proprietary, but I don't think they're fibre (The front pictures show pins, and the shot of the board shows them being wired directly onto the board, not optical components)[/QUOTE]
that whole 8p8c vs rj45 thing is a lost battle. I know the connector itself isn't the limiting factor but the medium that the connector attaches to is.
I see the pins now, the plugs themselves look very similar to SFP+ or maybe CXP but its pretty tough to tell from these photos.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.