Controversial Facebook group praying for Obama's death reaches 1 million members - Polidicks

Meanwhile 8 million people still like obama... [url]http://www.facebook.com/#!/barackobama?ref=search&sid=1075622314.777904702..1[/url]

[QUOTE=phantom87;21639973]They're just a bunch of ass-hurt, bigoted, fuckwits. I don't understand it, democrats had to put up with Mr. Chimp for eight years.....Obama's been in there for little over a year and these people bitch and whine like he's Harding reincarnate. Their stupidity is staggering.[/QUOTE] Obama is doing a shit job.

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21642444]Obama is doing a shit job.[/QUOTE] Statements like these need justification.

jeez all this collective thinking can't be good for obama's chances

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21642444]Obama is doing a shit job.[/QUOTE] which translates to "i don't agree with his policies"

[QUOTE=PrismatexV8;21642492]Statements like these need justification.[/QUOTE] Statements that others made for Obama require justification too. I disagree with the general consensus on this forum that Obama is doing good. Deal with it.

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21642538] Deal with it.[/QUOTE] That is my choice, not yours.

[QUOTE=thisispain;21642529]which translates to "i don't agree with his policies"[/QUOTE] Which is perfectly fine. If someone agrees with his policies he is doing a great job, if someone doesn't he is doing a shit job.

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21642444]Obama is doing a shit job.[/QUOTE] Back up your claims. How is he doing a shit job? [editline]12:07AM[/editline] [QUOTE=yawmwen;21642575]Which is perfectly fine.[/QUOTE] Not really.

[QUOTE=JDK721;21642626]Back up your claims. How is he doing a shit job? [editline]12:07AM[/editline] Not really.[/QUOTE] back up your post. How is he not? How are his policies good? How is his plan good?

[QUOTE=yawmwen;21642575]Which is perfectly fine. If someone agrees with his policies he is doing a great job, if someone doesn't he is doing a shit job.[/QUOTE] Foreigners: Eh he's doing ok.

[QUOTE=yawmwen;21642575]Which is perfectly fine. If someone agrees with his policies he is doing a great job, if someone doesn't he is doing a shit job.[/QUOTE] well relatively, yeah but some objectivity here would be a good thing

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21642652]back up your post. How is he not? How are his policies good? How is his plan good?[/QUOTE] That's not how it works. I never made a claim. YOU made the claim that he's doing a shit job so YOU back your statement up.

[QUOTE=JDK721;21642670]That's not how it works. I never made a claim. YOU made the claim that he's doing a shit job so YOU back your statement up.[/QUOTE] He's doing a shit job. Bush did a shit job. They both suck donkey balls. I'm not going to waste my time explaining my views to you. You disagree that is fine. I disagree that he is doing good. None of you are backing up your statements so neither will I.

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21642741]He's doing a shit job. Bush did a shit job. They both suck donkey balls. I'm not going to waste my time explaining my views to you. You disagree that is fine. I disagree that he is doing good. None of you are backing up your statements so neither will I.[/QUOTE] You didn't really get your point across.

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21642741]He's doing a shit job. Bush did a shit job. They both suck donkey balls. I'm not going to waste my time explaining my views to you. You disagree that is fine. I disagree that he is doing good. None of you are backing up your statements so neither will I.[/QUOTE] Explain how he is doing a shit job. If you make a claim like that don't be a pussy and backpedal when asked to justify your position. I NEVER made a statement so I don't have to back up shit.

I still don't know why Obama is that bad. [editline]09:17PM[/editline] tell me Sgt.Sgt

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21642741]I'm not going to waste my time explaining my views to you. [/QUOTE] This is a forum. If you aren't interested in debate, then why post?

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21642444]Obama is doing a shit job.[/QUOTE] You try fixing Bush's fuckups....I'd imagine it's not an easy task.

[QUOTE=thisispain;21642669]well relatively, yeah but some objectivity here would be a good thing[/QUOTE] Objectivity is nearly impossible in politics, since it is so emotionally charged.

[QUOTE=KmScMT;21640637]its free speech. too bad obama will take that away soon[/QUOTE] The collective stupidity of every person to ever exist does not even [B]BEGIN[/B] to compare to how retarded you are.

[QUOTE=phantom87;21642822]You try fixing Bush's fuckups....I'd imagine it's not an easy task.[/QUOTE] Obama is digging a deeper hole. All these incentives he's offering they come from somewhere, maybe not today, maybe not next year but down the road you will pay for it in taxes, and it will be more than you think. All this borrowed money is making the USD lose more value so you will have to pay in more. He's pushing for a stronger central government. Which we will have to pay for, because in order to make it stronger you have to add more positions, more jobs(doesn't need more needs restructuring and cutbacks). Then the public sees that as adding more jobs... but they forget that those jobs are paid with your taxes. Obama was right that healthcare needed reform, but not like this. Just wait, a few years from now you won't want it. He's appointing [B]czars[/B]! Red flag! Big ass red flag! They are super aids (save you jokes) with huge numbers of powers they should not have. He's destroying the system of checks and balances that is supposed to keep the government from becoming too powerful in one area. The head of the IRS is a tax cheat! Obama appointed him! WTF. He's tried to ban guns, or make it very hard to get guns. He couldn't do that so he went after ammo serializing it. Adding to the manufacturing cost. I am angry about this and I don't even own a gun. It's a baby step towards total arms prohibition. Which will further the government into becoming more powerful. The government is supposed to fear it's people, part of that fear comes from the possibility of revolution which doesn't work well with rocks and sticks as weapons. Now if someone like the last thread says CITATION NEEDED. Google it yourself you lazy twat.

link to group?

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21643272] He's appointing [B]czars[/B]! Red flag! Big ass red flag! They are super aids (save you jokes) with huge numbers of powers they should not have. He's destroying the system of checks and balances that is supposed to keep the government from becoming too powerful in one area. [/QUOTE] Wrong [QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21643272] He's tried to ban guns, or make it very hard to get guns. He couldn't do that so he went after ammo serializing it. Adding to the manufacturing cost. I am angry about this and I don't even own a gun. It's a baby step towards total arms prohibition. Which will further the government into becoming more powerful. The government is supposed to fear it's people, part of that fear comes from the possibility of revolution which doesn't work well with rocks and sticks as weapons.[/QUOTE] Also wrong

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21643272]Obama is digging a deeper hole. All these incentives he's offering they come from somewhere, maybe not today, maybe not next year but down the road you will pay for it in taxes, and it will be more than you think. All this borrowed money is making the USD lose more value so you will have to pay in more. He's pushing for a stronger central government. Which we will have to pay for, because in order to make it stronger you have to add more positions, more jobs(doesn't need more needs restructuring and cutbacks). Then the public sees that as adding more jobs... but they forget that those jobs are paid with your taxes. Obama was right that healthcare needed reform, but not like this. Just wait, a few years from now you won't want it. He's appointing [B]czars[/B]! Red flag! Big ass red flag! They are super aids (save you jokes) with huge numbers of powers they should not have. He's destroying the system of checks and balances that is supposed to keep the government from becoming too powerful in one area. The head of the IRS is a tax cheat! Obama appointed him! WTF. He's tried to ban guns, or make it very hard to get guns. He couldn't do that so he went after ammo serializing it. Adding to the manufacturing cost. I am angry about this and I don't even own a gun. It's a baby step towards total arms prohibition. Which will further the government into becoming more powerful. The government is supposed to fear it's people, part of that fear comes from the possibility of revolution which doesn't work well with rocks and sticks as weapons. Now if someone like the last thread says CITATION NEEDED. Google it yourself you lazy twat.[/QUOTE] Ok now for a non insane reason Obama isn't doing so hot, i.e. he's done much less than he could to reverse the unconstitutional or overpowered policies started by Bush, mainly the Patriot Act, unwarranted spying and tapping, treatment of war prisoners, etc etc. He's not doing a horrible job, per se, he could just do a lot more to undo what Bush did. That, and as thousands of people have said, he's a constitutional scholar. He should know better with these issues.

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21643272]Obama is digging a deeper hole. All these incentives he's offering they come from somewhere, maybe not today, maybe not next year but down the road you will pay for it in taxes, and it will be more than you think. All this borrowed money is making the USD lose more value so you will have to pay in more. He's pushing for a stronger central government. Which we will have to pay for, because in order to make it stronger you have to add more positions, more jobs(doesn't need more needs restructuring and cutbacks). Then the public sees that as adding more jobs... but they forget that those jobs are paid with your taxes. Obama was right that healthcare needed reform, but not like this. Just wait, a few years from now you won't want it. [/QUOTE] That's what everyone said about everything [QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21643272]He's appointing [B]czars[/B]! Red flag! Big ass red flag! They are super aids (save you jokes) with huge numbers of powers they should not have. He's destroying the system of checks and balances that is supposed to keep the government from becoming too powerful in one area.[/QUOTE] Czars were invented by Republicans, the so called "small government" people. [QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21643272]The head of the IRS is a tax cheat! Obama appointed him! WTF.[/QUOTE] The Senate appoints those people. [QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21643272]He's tried to ban guns, or make it very hard to get guns.[/QUOTE] Really. How does Obama control that which are state issues? You should be thanking him, gun sales skyrocketed when he was elected. [QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21643272]He couldn't do that so he went after ammo serializing it. Adding to the manufacturing cost. I am angry about this and I don't even own a gun. It's a baby step towards total arms prohibition. Which will further the government into becoming more powerful. The government is supposed to fear it's people, part of that fear comes from the possibility of revolution which doesn't work well with rocks and sticks as weapons.[/QUOTE] Fear it is people? [QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21643272]Now if someone like the last thread says CITATION NEEDED. Google it yourself you lazy twat.[/QUOTE] I don't know why you are acting so hostile.

One of my friends joined that [editline]01:02AM[/editline] I have less than 300 facebook friends omg he is a statistical anomaly

[QUOTE=Xen Tricks;21643350]Ok now for a non insane reason Obama isn't doing so hot, i.e. he's done much less than he could to reverse the unconstitutional or overpowered policies started by Bush, mainly the Patriot Act, unwarranted spying and tapping, treatment of war prisoners, etc etc. He's not doing a horrible job, per se, he could just do a lot more to undo what Bush did. That, and as thousands of people have said, he's a constitutional scholar. He should know better with these issues.[/QUOTE] This is true. Also wasn't there an extension on the patriot act under his administration or was it at the end of the bush presidency? I forget. [QUOTE=Lambeth;21643312]Wrong Also wrong[/QUOTE] What do you mean wrong? Have you not watched or read the news? [url]http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-4828759-503544.html[/url] Also on the second one yeah I am wrong. It was towards the end of the bush era, however Obama was for it.

[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;21643272] He's tried to ban guns, or make it very hard to get guns. He couldn't do that so he went after ammo serializing it. Adding to the manufacturing cost. I am angry about this and I don't even own a gun. It's a baby step towards total arms prohibition. Which will further the government into becoming more powerful. The government is supposed to fear it's people, part of that fear comes from the possibility of revolution which doesn't work well with rocks and sticks as weapons. [/QUOTE] I won't say anything else about your post because I really don't know but this isn't true AFAIK. Obama hasn't done shit with guns from what I can recall. It has just been a big scare because Democrats tend to be more pro gun-control. [editline]05:10AM[/editline] [QUOTE=thisispain;21643382] Czars were invented by Republicans, the so called "small government" people.[/QUOTE] That doesn't make it right.

Am I some rare intermediate between "Obama is the greatest thing to ever happen to America" and "Obama is a socialist fascist antichrist"?