New GOP Bill Would Allow Hospitals To Let Women Die Instead Of Having An Abortion - Polidicks

So if the mother dies, does "Protect Life Act" really live up to it's name? If the laws are already in place that allows a hospital to relocate patients to someplace with doctors willing to perform abortion, what on earth would be the point of this law aside from sneakily opening up the possibility to please Jesus through "punishing" women wanting the procedure? Could someone answer that?

This is just terrible. Nothing else needs to be said.

[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;27883613]Glaber... Please defend this[/QUOTE] Let's see, in referring to ExplodingGuy's post with the bill in it. It appears that this amendment only strips out funds for cases where it's not an emergency. Oddly enough, I'm ok with this for now even though it still permits funds for emergency abortions. Now if the Obama administration was doing things the legal way, this amendment would probably had just popped up later. [editline]5th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Zeke129;27883751]The democrats ended a war, repealed DADT, reformed healthcare, reformed the financial sector, and[B] prevented a second great depression[/B] Stop saying they didn't accomplish anything because it's horseshit[/QUOTE] Prevented! Why don't you visit south of your border sometime? They didn't prevent a great depression, they're trying to cause one!

[QUOTE=Zeke129;27883751]The democrats ended a war, repealed DADT, reformed healthcare, reformed the financial sector, and prevented a second great depression Stop saying they didn't accomplish anything because it's horseshit[/QUOTE] The repeal of DADT was inevitable, and for your information I don't consider the compromised watered down piece of shit that barely passed as "health care reform". I know that they have to take small steps, but a compromise is not a victory in any sense.

my pary are with the mother

[QUOTE=Zeke129;27883708]Uhh Read what I bolded. Hospitals don't have to send women out for abortions even if they are necessary. The exception based on rape that comes earlier in the bill doesn't apply to this section, only to federal funding. [/QUOTE] Ah well, I tried.

[QUOTE=Glaber;27883843]Let's see, in referring to ExplodingGuy's post with the bill in it. It appears that this amendment only strips out funds for cases where it's not an emergency. Oddly enough, I'm ok with this for now even though it still permits funds for emergency abortions. Now if the Obama administration was doing things the legal way, this amendment would probably had just popped up later. [editline]5th February 2011[/editline] Prevented! Why don't you visit south of your border sometime? They didn't prevent a great depression, they're trying to cause one![/QUOTE] yes glaber, the democrats are trying to cause another depression also good job avoiding zeke's post shitting on explodingguys

[QUOTE=TH89;27883893]my pary are with the mother[/QUOTE] i am truley sorry for your lots

[QUOTE=Glaber;27883843]Let's see, in referring to ExplodingGuy's post with the bill in it. It appears that this amendment only strips out funds for cases where it's not an emergency. Oddly enough, I'm ok with this for now even though it still permits funds for emergency abortions. Now if the Obama administration was doing things the legal way, this amendment would probably had just popped up later. [editline]5th February 2011[/editline] Prevented! Why don't you visit south of your border sometime? They didn't prevent a great depression, they're trying to cause one![/QUOTE] So in a single post you a) didn't read the bill b) called the Obama administration illegal c) said they are actively trying to damage America

[QUOTE=Glaber;27883843]Let's see, in referring to ExplodingGuy's post with the bill in it. It appears that this amendment only strips out funds for cases where it's not an emergency. Oddly enough, I'm ok with this for now even though it still permits funds for emergency abortions. Now if the Obama administration was doing things the legal way, this amendment would probably had just popped up later. [editline]5th February 2011[/editline] Prevented! Why don't you visit south of your border sometime? They didn't prevent a great depression, they're trying to cause one![/QUOTE] Oh Glaber, never change. Because that would be progression. Which is evil.

[QUOTE=Last or First;27883946]Oh Glaber, never change. Because that would be progression. Which is evil.[/QUOTE] In fact I think he should go backwards to a time when we didn't yet have limbs and were unable to operate keyboards

How about we just kill tax evaders instead?

[QUOTE=Pace.;27883890]The repeal of DADT was inevitable, and for your information I don't consider the compromised watered down piece of shit that barely passed as "health care reform". I know that they have to take small steps, but a compromise is not a victory in any sense.[/QUOTE] GOP party line is not going to change from keep it in place. Hell, if they had power, it's pretty clear we'd be seeing some more anti-gay legislation rolling out. The healthcare reform does suck, but you need something in place to start the change I think. Your country clearly doesn't see a healthcare system as a good idea despite it working pretty well everywhere else in the world.

[QUOTE=Glaber;27883843]Now if the Obama administration was doing things the legal way, this amendment would probably had just popped up later.[/QUOTE] They tried to put something similar into "Obamacare" but it failed thankfully. [editline]5th February 2011[/editline] Called the Stupak amendment.

[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;27884038] The healthcare reform does suck, but you need something in place to start the change I think. Your country clearly doesn't see a healthcare system as a good idea despite it working pretty well everywhere else in the world.[/QUOTE] It sucks because it supports the insurance companies but since it prevents them from denying coverage based on preexisting conditions it's a very good first step. A public option can always be added later, the framework is there.

[QUOTE=Zeke129;27883945]So in a single post you a) didn't read the bill [B]b) called the Obama administration illegal[/B] c) said they are actively trying to damage America[/QUOTE] Well, if they obeyed the judge that rulled the whole thing unconstitutional, I wouldn't be calling them illegal. Besides, the parts you boded in the bill don't say that those who do preform the emergency abortions don't get the money. Just that they can refuse to preform the abortion. Who knows, maybe if people knew that hospitals were less willing to preform abortions, we'd have less people having sex out of wedlock, or the drug companies, excuse me, Big Pharma making more money off of birth control pills. Oh and about point c, read this: [url]http://www.prisonplanet.com/obamas-blocking-of-new-power-plants-triggers-nationwide-blackouts.html[/url]

[QUOTE=Glaber;27884436]Well, if they obeyed the judge that rulled the whole thing unconstitutional, I wouldn't be calling them illegal. Besides, the parts you boded in the bill don't say that those who do preform the emergency abortions don't get the money. Just that they can refuse to preform the abortion. Who knows, maybe if people knew that hospitals were less willing to preform abortions, we'd have less people having sex out of wedlock, or the drug companies, excuse me, Big Pharma making more money off of birth control pills. Oh and about point c, read this: [url]http://www.prisonplanet.com/obamas-blocking-of-new-power-plants-triggers-nationwide-blackouts.html[/url][/QUOTE] Uh no the coal plants are failing on their own due to an inefficient system [editline]5th February 2011[/editline] If obama was really trying to damage america he would take a literal dump on the constitution or something.

[QUOTE=Glaber;27884436]Well, if they obeyed the judge that rulled the whole thing unconstitutional, I wouldn't be calling them illegal.[/quote] Would only be the case if the supreme court made that ruling Glaber. You are a ~political expert~, you should know this. [QUOTE=Glaber;27884436]Besides, the parts you boded in the bill don't say that those who do preform the emergency abortions don't get the money. Just that they can refuse to preform the abortion.[/quote] And can refuse to refer her for one as well. Essentially, they are allowed to let her die in the hospital bed. Reading comprehension, Glaber. [QUOTE=Glaber;27884436]Who knows, maybe if people knew that hospitals were less willing to preform abortions, we'd have less people having sex out of wedlock, or the drug companies, excuse me, Big Pharma making more money off of birth control pills.[/quote] You're stupid. There is nothing wrong with sex out of wedlock this isn't 1394. [QUOTE=Glaber;27884436]Oh and about point c, read this: [url]http://www.prisonplanet.com/obamas-blocking-of-new-power-plants-triggers-nationwide-blackouts.html[/url][/QUOTE] Prison Planet is not a source and I will not sully my fantastic web history with it. 4 HIT COMBO

Men making womens' decisions, what could possibly go wrong?

[QUOTE=Glaber;27884436]Well, if they obeyed the judge that rulled the whole thing unconstitutional, I wouldn't be calling them illegal. Besides, the parts you boded in the bill don't say that those who do preform the emergency abortions don't get the money. Just that they can refuse to preform the abortion. Who knows, maybe if people knew that hospitals were less willing to preform abortions, we'd have less people having sex out of wedlock, or the drug companies, excuse me, Big Pharma making more money off of birth control pills. Oh and about point c, read this: [url]http://www.prisonplanet.com/obamas-blocking-of-new-power-plants-triggers-nationwide-blackouts.html[/url][/QUOTE] [url=http://www.youtubedoubler.com/?video1=http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DZlkAjKk_4f8%26feature%3Drelated&start1=200&video2=http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DaY7Nji-zzhg&start2=0&authorName=Lambeth] Requiem for a complete nutter[/url]

Well regardless, zeke, it may not be 1394, but what's wrong with waiting to be married before having sex? and Why should anti abortion people be forced to pay for abortions anyway? Edit: Who's Alex Jones?

[QUOTE=Glaber;27884941]what's wrong with waiting to be married before having sex? [/QUOTE] it sucks [editline]5th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Glaber;27884436] Who knows, maybe if people knew that hospitals were less willing to preform abortions, we'd have less people having sex out of wedlock[/QUOTE] no not really [editline]5th February 2011[/editline] the last thing any of us were concerned about while having unprotected sex (you know that's how childeren are made, right?) was abortions

God, I just came back from playing GTAIV and I swear this is so stupid it fits right in with the radio satire.

[QUOTE=thisispain;27884967]it sucks[/QUOTE] So? You rather knock up some woman and then have to be responsible for her decision on weather to abort or not? [QUOTE=thisispain;27884967]the last thing any of us were concerned about while having unprotected sex (you know that's how childeren are made, right?) was abortions[/QUOTE] And this is why Big pharma is making money off of birth control pills.

[QUOTE=Glaber;27884941]Well regardless, zeke, it may not be 1394, but what's wrong with waiting to be married before having sex?[/QUOTE] Nothing. What's wrong with having sex when you're not married? There's no reason that the existence of pre/non-marital sex should be mutually exclusive with marital sex. [QUOTE=Glaber;27884941]Who's Alex Jones?[/QUOTE] A super saiyan. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhqUk28OwHs[/media]

[QUOTE=Glaber;27885008]So? You rather knock up some woman and then have to be responsible for her decision on weather to abort or not?[/QUOTE] no i'd pull out or if it happened to be a particularly awesome planned out day i'd use a condom what are you, 12 years old come on now

This Is just getting fucking ridiculous.

[QUOTE=Glaber;27885008] And this is why Big pharma is making money off of birth control pills.[/QUOTE] well good birth control pills rock go women

[QUOTE=Glaber;27884941]Who's Alex Jones?[/QUOTE] The dude who founded your source [img]http://i.cubeupload.com/MpEaxA.jpg[/img]

I have to ask, Is Glaber just a troll or a fucking retard? I really, REALLY can't tell.