• Switzerland Considers Legalizing Incest
    143 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Extroll;26756022]As do I, I just don't understand in the US why Americans are more accepting of incest than gay marriage.[/QUOTE] Because incest is still between a man and a woman? It's just a guess. Pretty stupid reason if it turned out to be true.
[QUOTE=Xenomoose;26756663]Because incest is still between a man and a woman? It's just a guess. Pretty stupid reason if it turned out to be true.[/QUOTE] Nope, it's because A part of em is already doing their sisters.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;26755724]I find them equally acceptable. If you're not hurting someone who gives a shit[/QUOTE] If you don't find inbred couples giving births to retards bad, then I bet you have a hot sister.
[QUOTE=Uncle_Earl;26756768]If you don't find inbred couples giving births to retards bad, then I bet you have a hot sister.[/QUOTE] Again, we are not talking about making baby's here, we're talking about having sex. Although those two are related, they are not the same.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;26755495]The man with what appears to be a Nascar avatar wants to impose his morals on us [b]and[/b] thinks homosexuals can't stop fucking everyone of the same sex hahaha[/QUOTE] You're assuming I'm just some redneck who assumes homosexuals fuck the same sex like crazy because of an avatar? :irony: That must be the only reason because no where in what I said did I imply that. My point was that homosexuals are HOMOsexuals as in they are only attracted to ONE sex. While these incest people aren't ONLY attracted to relatives. I never said anything about homosexuals not being able to stop fucking people so that had to just come from your own head. Nothing personal, just what you said was really fucking stupid and hypocritical
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;26757293]That must be the only reason because no where in what I said did I imply that.[/QUOTE] "unlike homosexuality or something like that, they don't HAVE to have sex with their relatives and can choose to live a normal life with people they aren't related to" You're saying that incestuous people can choose whether they follow their preferences. You're contrasting them with homosexuals, therefore implying that homosexuals can't control themselves and are slaves to their sexual urges.
why is this even an issue? as long as they aren't producing retarded children (which IS immoral and negligent) i don't see why not. ofc i'm texan so my stance on this doesn't mean much in the eyes of y'all civilized folk
[QUOTE=ThePuska;26757794]"unlike homosexuality or something like that, they don't HAVE to have sex with their relatives and can choose to live a normal life with people they aren't related to" You're saying that incestuous people can choose whether they follow their preferences. You're contrasting them with homosexuals, therefore implying that homosexuals can't control themselves and are slaves to their sexual urges.[/QUOTE] I'm not saying they can't control their sexual urges as in, how often they have sex. I'm saying they can't be attracted to the opposite sex and don't have a choice between the two. How often they give into their sexual urges varies from person to person, gay or straight. I contrast the two because unlike homosexuals who can't just CHOOSE to be straight, incestuous people can still be attracted to non family members and aren't genetically bound to only be attracted to their family.
[QUOTE=teh pirate;26757978]why is this even an issue? as long as they aren't producing retarded children (which IS immoral and negligent) i don't see why not. ofc i'm texan so my stance on this doesn't mean much in the eyes of y'all civilized folk[/QUOTE] I agree with you, I aint no texan.
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;26758015]I'm not saying they can't control their sexual urges as in, how often they have sex. I'm saying they can't be attracted to the opposite sex and don't have a choice between the two. How often they give into their sexual urges varies from person to person, gay or straight. I contrast the two because unlike homosexuals who can't just CHOOSE to be straight, incestuous people can still be attracted to non family members and aren't genetically bound to only be attracted to their family.[/QUOTE] As long as it keeps their genes from tainting the gene pool, it's fine by me.
Many immigrating cultures and religions would appreciate this.
I'm okay with this.
YES!! *cough** ugh I mean I am indifferent.
wtf is with you people
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;26758741]As long as it keeps their genes from tainting the gene pool, it's fine by me.[/QUOTE] Oh no, not the gene pool, what will it do. I don't want to swim in a dirty gene pool.
Ah, fun for the whole family.
[QUOTE=ineedateam1;26751322]Oh god the fucking INBREADING [/QUOTE] [img]http://i972.photobucket.com/albums/ae203/EliChowning/Reactions/41245143.gif[/img]
Not incest. [B][I]Wincest.[/I][/B] :v:
legalize incest, illegalize minarets
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;26751556]I don't think there's anything wrong with having morals and unlike homosexuality or something like that, they don't HAVE to have sex with their relatives and can choose to live a normal life with people they aren't related to. It's just a fetish so I don't see anything wrong with it being illegal IMO.[/QUOTE] "It's just a personal choice that doesn't harm anyone if its between two consenting adults so it can be illegal". [b]fucking brilliant[/b]
I find it gross but I still see eating shit as gross and since thats legal so should incest I guess.
[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;26751345]It sounds DELICIOUS! [editline]17th December 2010[/editline] The inbreading, not the incest[/QUOTE] Can't they both be?
[QUOTE=Im Crimson;26752812]Legalization of incest would promote it (just like legalization of pot would promote smoking it) [/QUOTE] not only would it probably not work that way with incest it has been proven that it doesnt work that way with weed.
[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;26751635]Uh, the entire Book of Genesis promotes it. Apparently the entirety of the human population came from 2 people.[/QUOTE] It makes a bit of sense with the Bible/Torah which states that Adam and Eve were perfect, meaning that inbreeding wouldn't be an issue until genetic mutations started happening. The Torah is a bit more confusing because they give like two or three different stories for the creation of Adam and Eve, one where I believe Adam and Eve were both created at the same time.
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;26753458]Actually no, humans were created on the sixth day, God rested on the seventh day, and created Adam and Eve specifically after that.[/QUOTE] And after 6 thousand years of incest you were born
[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;26751635]Uh, the entire Book of Genesis promotes it. Apparently the entirety of the human population came from 2 people.[/quote] Which guy was that again who got drunk off his ass and boned his 2 daughters?
Even if incest is illegal, it's really easy to do it, so this ban is stupid.
[QUOTE=Uncle_Earl;26752104]Do you even know why inbreeding stopped? Ever seen the old European kings? This quote about charles II of Spain: Why did it happen? Because of this: [img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Carlos_segundo80.png[/img_thumb] EDIT: Why is this funny?[/QUOTE] You forgot to mention the part where royal families only married other royal families. This was inevitable. [QUOTE=Im Crimson;26752812]Legalization of incest would promote it (just like legalization of pot would promote smoking it) therefor more in-breeding would occur as pregnancies, unwanted or not, will happen. Perhaps a decent middle-ground would be to allow incest, but prohibit incestuous births. Something like that would be a bit weird to regulate however, especially since it would bring abortion laws into play.[/QUOTE] I thought it was the other way around. That making it illegal just made people want to do it. Like putting a big, shiny, red "DON'T PRESS" sign over a button. [QUOTE=lead_farmer;26753545]Freud had a theory called the Oedipus complex where the child is attracted to their different gender parent and only lose this feeling after repression of said feelings.[/QUOTE] Fun fact: "Oedipus" is derived from Greek mythology, where the son of a king, Oedipus, is foreseen to kill his father. The father sends the kid away to die in the wild, but is taken in and raised, thus, he never knew his true family. Oedipus comes back, accidentally kills the king of Thebes, kills a Sphinx by solving a riddle, and then becomes a Hero of Thebes. The queen, who is a widow and doesn't know who killed the king, ends up marrying Oedipus. The queen was his mom, the king, his dad. Moral of the story, is that if you name your theory/syndrome after popular scholarly material, it gets more attention and respect.
I don't see why not; if they're both above the legal age it shouldn't be anyones business but their own.
Well they won't have to worry about picking last names if they'e siblingings.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.