• WMDs found in Iraq
    116 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Roof;25752961]Maybe you have poor reading.[/QUOTE] I've thought over it in my head multiple times and your sentence doesn't make sense. given or hidden? given to who?
Small home-made chemical bombs is not a WMD. The large stockpiles of chemical weapons that Saddam had were WMDs, but everyone and their mother has those. America, most of Europe, Iran, Saudi, Israel, Syria, [i]Japan[/i], but no one is going to invade over those. Saddam hadn't used chems since the Gulf War. Alright, I'm just going to say this- the Iraq war was started because, and we have evidence of this, I've been let on by credible sources, because Saddam had passed chemical weapons to enemy agents and had plans drawn up to release chemical weapons on US soil.
[QUOTE=ZekeTwo;25751944]Absolutely. God spoke to me and said that the Iraq war was justified and that Americans are the chosen people to lead the world into a glorious golden age of Christianity a alright I can't do this anymore[/QUOTE] What the fuck happened to you?
[QUOTE=Aman V;25751999]Most countries have forms of chemical weapons. Guess they should get invaded too? Really I'm not about the whole lovey dovey WAR IS EVIL type of idealism. But even in this case I don't even think the U.S.'s invasion paid off in their "secret" objectives. Pretty much a stalemate/failure.[/QUOTE] Most countries aren't run by crazy dictators who are willing to kill their own citizens with chemical weapons.
Today is a good day to be alive
[QUOTE=Aman V;25752756]YEAH CAUSE YOU KNOW, IF WE COULD DO THE IMPOSSIBLE WE COULD DO THE IMPOSSIBLE! That is pretty much what you are saying and it makes my head hurt[/QUOTE] I didnt know not using oil was impossible
According to Wikipedia, chemical weapons are weapons of mass destruction.
[QUOTE=Dr_Funk;25756814]According to Wikipedia, chemical weapons are weapons of mass destruction.[/QUOTE] And according to the rest of the world, they are owned by every fucking government. They do not count, they went in based on NUCLEAR weaponry. No one gave a rats ass about the chemicals, these have been known about for a few years now.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25757545]And according to the rest of the world, they are owned by every fucking government. They do not count, they went in based on NUCLEAR weaponry. No one gave a rats ass about the chemicals, these have been known about for a few years now.[/QUOTE] [img]http://radioislam.org/lebanon/jewish-gifs/jewish-massacres-in-libanon_files/killed-by-chemical-weapons.jpg[/img] Yeah chemical weapons are totally less cruel than nuclear, that instantly kills you before you even know what happened.
[QUOTE=alienmartian23;25757599][img_thumb]http://radioislam.org/lebanon/jewish-gifs/jewish-massacres-in-libanon_files/killed-by-chemical-weapons.jpg[/img_thumb] Yeah chemical weapons are totally less cruel than nuclear, that instantly kills you before you even know what happened.[/QUOTE] not everyone affected dies instantly, those farther from the explosion end up with extreme burns and whatnot
[QUOTE=VaultBoi;25757682]not everyone affected dies instantly, those farther from the explosion end up with extreme burns and whatnot[/QUOTE] Most of the people affected by a nuke die, a lot more people affected by chemical weapons stay alive and suffer
[QUOTE=alienmartian23;25757599][img_thumb]http://radioislam.org/lebanon/jewish-gifs/jewish-massacres-in-libanon_files/killed-by-chemical-weapons.jpg[/img_thumb] Yeah chemical weapons are totally less cruel than nuclear, that instantly kills you before you even know what happened.[/QUOTE] Lol are you fucking dumb? Nuclear radiation killed so many more than you realize in Japan slowly over 50 years. I'm not saying chemical weapons aren't dangerous, they fucking are, [b]but you're not fucking reading what the fuck I'm saying. Almost every government has chemical weapons. And frankly, saying that having them justifies a full scale invasion is fucking stupid.[/b] But go ahead and just be stupid. [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Tetracycline;25757747]Most of the people affected by a nuke die, a lot more people affected by chemical weapons stay alive and suffer[/QUOTE] Radiation and nuclear weaponry is far more dangerous, far more scary, and far more justifiable than chemical weaponry. The US has chemical weapons, so right there, that justification goes out the window.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXbCwq4ewBU[/media] it was liberation, Iraqi's are now free to play football and PlayStation
[QUOTE=alienmartian23;25757599][img_thumb]http://radioislam.org/lebanon/jewish-gifs/jewish-massacres-in-libanon_files/killed-by-chemical-weapons.jpg[/img_thumb] Yeah chemical weapons are totally less cruel than nuclear, that instantly kills you before you even know what happened.[/QUOTE] Holy Jesus are you comparing a NUKE and small scale chemical weaponry? You know, a nuke, which can level cities, decimate populations and affect people for years through radiation poisoning? HumanAbyss beat me to it but still god damn
The government of Iraq transitioned from peace and security, to war and freedom.
You wanna talk shock images? Here's one 1000x worse than yours alienmartian. Sure shows you're so fucking wrong. [img]http://www.documentingreality.com/forum/attachments/f149/74311d1248366199-hiroshima-atomic-bomb-survivor-charonboat_dot_com_hiroshima_victim.jpg[/img] [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] Yeah man, Chemical warfare is so much worse than this, yeah?
Is that someone who was present at both bomb droppings?
[QUOTE=Lambeth;25758712]Is that someone who was present at both bomb droppings?[/QUOTE] Just one I think, Nagasaki if I remember correctly.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25758351]You wanna talk shock images? Here's one 1000x worse than yours alienmartian. Sure shows you're so fucking wrong. [img_thumb]http://www.documentingreality.com/forum/attachments/f149/74311d1248366199-hiroshima-atomic-bomb-survivor-charonboat_dot_com_hiroshima_victim.jpg[/img_thumb] [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] Yeah man, Chemical warfare is so much worse than this, yeah?[/QUOTE] ok I was wrong jeez
At least you admit it.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25758351]You wanna talk shock images? Here's one 1000x worse than yours alienmartian. Sure shows you're so fucking wrong. [img_thumb]http://www.documentingreality.com/forum/attachments/f149/74311d1248366199-hiroshima-atomic-bomb-survivor-charonboat_dot_com_hiroshima_victim.jpg[/img_thumb] [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] Yeah man, Chemical warfare is so much worse than this, yeah?[/QUOTE] I think I've killed that guy in Fallout before
[QUOTE=NEUFDANIELS;25751166]looks like america needs some more oil[/QUOTE] The original name of this mission was "[b]O[/b]peration [b]I[/b]raq [b]L[/b]iberation." Go figure.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25757545]They do not count, they went in based on NUCLEAR weaponry.[/QUOTE] I'd like a source on that.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25758351]You wanna talk shock images? Here's one 1000x worse than yours alienmartian. Sure shows you're so fucking wrong. [img_thumb]http://www.documentingreality.com/forum/attachments/f149/74311d1248366199-hiroshima-atomic-bomb-survivor-charonboat_dot_com_hiroshima_victim.jpg[/img_thumb] [editline]30th October 2010[/editline] Yeah man, Chemical warfare is so much worse than this, yeah[/quote] I didn't know Ghouls existed in real life
[QUOTE=Dr_Funk;25759710]I'd like a source on that.[/QUOTE] How about the fact that about 5 other governments the US is unfriendly with has the same chemical weaponry and yet doesn't fucking invade them? How about the fact that the US has chemical weapons? How about the fact they wanted to go after them for YELLOW CAKE URANIUM? Rumsfield himself talked about how they were using yellow cake uranium for the purposes of a WMD program. Do you seriously NOT get this?
[QUOTE=evilweazel;25753187]What the fuck happened to you?[/QUOTE] I found Jesus. He was under the sofa
^^ Mate, I said I wanted a source, not a berating. Do you have a source?
Does no one remember Rumsfield bitching about Yellowcake uranium and Iraq trying to obtain it? Of course you fucking don't when it goes against your view point.
[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;25759760]Does no one remember Rumsfield bitching about Yellowcake uranium and Iraq trying to obtain it? Of course you fucking don't when it goes against your view point.[/QUOTE] Source, at all? Because I've heard different. E: Hang on, you don't even know what my view-point is, because I haven't stated it.
[QUOTE=Dr_Funk;25759755]^^ Mate, I said I wanted a source, not a berating. Do you have a source?[/QUOTE] I guess common sense and what the fuck the secretary of defense says means shit to you as proof. [editline]31st October 2010[/editline] [url]http://www.leadingtowar.com/claims_facts_yellowcake.php[/url] There. Happy?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.