That is a real big post that could have just been boiled down to
[QUOTE]What if the dossier is fake?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jordax;53101199]Isn't the grandest problem with the Steele dossier that all the meetings in them have those glaring holes in them in that they haven't verified if certain people were there at certain times? In the meetings Steele described about Russian politicians meeting people of Trump's team in different European countries, it remains unverified that said people of Trump's team were actually in said countries at those days. The closest case is that Michael Cohen was on the European continent on the day of one of those meetings, yet even then, he would have required to travel halfway through Europe in a single day without anyone noticing at the place he was staying at. That seems very improbable to me.
And now, even one of Trump's biggest critics at this forum admits that the biggest problem about the piss part, is that they aren't even sure if there even were prostitutes spotted at said hotel that night. All there is, is some very wishful thinking and assumptions on the part of those posters if those allegations are true. Which leads to some very blatant cases of confirmation bias. Especially since it would involve some very out of character moments on Trump's part, the occasions of him drinking alcohol are countable on one hand, and given how big of a germaphobe he is, him paying for two prostitutes only to piss all over a bed because Obama slept in it several years before seems just ridiculous. Wouldn't it be harder for spying networks to verify the events of a night at a five-star Russian hotel than to verify if any of Trump's team-members travelled to one of the destinations Steele claimed those meetings took place around the time those meetings took place? Which, you know, was supposed to be the biggest bombshell about Russian collusion, that Trump planned his run with the Russians for a few years beforehand? And how does it come that if the presence Trump's team-members isn't verified yet, while he claims that those meetings happened? Could it be a real possibility that Steele's sources could have given him false information on purpose?[/QUOTE]
[url=https://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/7u1vra/fbi_has_second_dossier_on_possible_trumprussia/dth0x7i/?context=1000]Okay seriously do you like actively avoid any kind of information about this whole investigation or something[/url] because there is a hell of a lot more to it than some dossier and more than a little bit of it casts [url=https://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/667f4q/trump_has_deep_links_to_organized_crime_federal/dgghvl8/?context=3]Tinyhands and his associates in some pretty fucking seriously concerning light[/url]
The Steele dossier is a hilariously tiny piece of a much larger puzzle. Basically the only reason it has any significance at all is because of how early it was released and how much of it has been corroborated since then
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
