[QUOTE=subenji99;18400791]Agreed, Flash is just not suited for 1080 streaming (97% CPU usage on my Athlon 64 X2 4600, Media Player Classic plays 1080 mkv's at 30% CPU due to offloading rendering to the GPU)
BUT
HTML5 is just around the corner, and a demo (which SHOULD apparently work with Firefox 3.5, Google Chrome and Safari) is available in youtube's labs section. HTML5 includes builtin video support that doesn't use flash, so everyone should get much-needed performance increases soon. :D
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Html5[/url]
[url]http://www.youtube.com/html5[/url][/QUOTE]
Man I can't wait till 2010.
[QUOTE=subenji99;18400791]Agreed, Flash is just not suited for 1080 streaming (97% CPU usage on my Athlon 64 X2 4600, Media Player Classic plays 1080 mkv's at 30% CPU due to offloading rendering to the GPU)
BUT
HTML5 is just around the corner, and a demo (which SHOULD apparently work with Firefox 3.5, Google Chrome and Safari) is available in youtube's labs section. HTML5 includes builtin video support that doesn't use flash, so everyone should get much-needed performance increases soon. :D
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Html5[/url]
[url]http://www.youtube.com/html5[/url][/QUOTE]
Theora (what Firefox uses) isn't as good a codec as H.264 (what Flash, Chrome and Safari use), although most people won't notice a difference if the videos are encoded properly.
The bigger problem, is that Flash currently decodes in software and composites in hardware, Firefox does both in software (which means it'll be slower than Flash, no performance increases)
[QUOTE=jcallan;18408169]Screen6 :saddowns:[/QUOTE]
You mean Stage6. That shit was so cash.
I've tried it, and It's kind of crappy. It looks almost identical to the 720p. It looks they they crappen the quality quite significantly.
Here's a 720 video of mine
[hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gM7NCXJNcKM[/hd]
and my 1080p
[hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3ihq8e7kig[/hd]
It could just be that they havn't fully integrated it yet, but it says when you're uploading that the best quality on youtube is 1920x1080.
what camera would be good for this?
A camera with a lot of megapixels, or a HD logo on it
[QUOTE=djjkxbox;19937603]A camera with a lot of megapixels, or a HD logo on it[/QUOTE]
suggest one?
Why
this thread is now a clock factory
[QUOTE=Wakka V2;18398581]As if youtube can handle the bandwidth with a billion viewers a day.[/QUOTE]
Hey Wakka V2.
[editline]11:02AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=saucekeg;19937793]this thread is now a clock factory[/QUOTE]
This thread was brought back from the dead.
give us 60fps
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.