sexual attraction has very little to do with homosexuality
Am I the only one who can't stand The Young Turks? I skipped through half the video, trying to find the part where Bachmann spoke, then gave up
[QUOTE=adadadsd;31007074]You see, you have a woman presidential candidate that want to ban porn, then you have male presidential candidates that want to legalize marijuana.
And then we ask ourselves, ''Why haven't we had a female president?''[/QUOTE]
I don't even care if you pulled that from somewhere, you sir, just win.
Yea, I would say Obama has this election pretty tucked away.
[QUOTE=Lalelalala;31012487][img]http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41s3fWentmL._SS500_.jpg[/img]
Synopsis: IT'S A MEDIA CONSPIRACY![/QUOTE]
Red book huh?
Do you know what other book is red?
[img]http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/4420/chairmanmoaslittleredbo.jpg[/img]
America apparently spends more on pornography than it does on charity donations to the Third World.
This ban is set to fail. Big Time.
[QUOTE=Memobot;31013317]America apparently spends more on pornography than it does on charity donations to the Third World.
This ban is set to fail. Big Time.[/QUOTE]
people buy porn?
[QUOTE=Sanius;31013105]sexual attraction has very little to do with homosexuality[/QUOTE]
As far as I've been able to determine, there are three equally important parts to any relationship: sexual attraction, intellectual attraction, and emotional attraction. A person you're not sexually attracted to won't meet your sexual needs, a person you're not intellectually attracted to will bore you, and a person who can't build emotional attachments won't fulfill your emotional needs. If your needs aren't met in any of those departments, relationships get old.
You say that a homosexual relationship has very little to do with sexual attraction, I say it has about 1/3 to do with it, same as any other relationship.
'Course, this isn't law, only observation. If that's terribly ignorant, please enlighten me.
And, as with most other relationships, a sexual attraction is usually what initially motivates you to discover those other things. :v:
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;31013451]As far as I've been able to determine, there are three equally important parts to any relationship: sexual attraction, intellectual attraction, and emotional attraction. A person you're not sexually attracted to won't meet your sexual needs, a person you're not intellectually attracted to will bore you, and a person who can't build emotional attachments won't fulfill your emotional needs. If your needs aren't met in any of those departments, relationships get old.[/QUOTE]
In my experience relationships are a "pick two" situation
[QUOTE=cardboard_panda;31012629]I'd honestly like to see her win presidency so i can laugh at the people who supported and voted for her, and laugh at the politicians who helped her get to presidency, then laugh about what my country has come to.[/QUOTE]
If she wins the presidency then I will be the new Lee Harvey Oswald.
Someone should photoshop her onto the cover of some porno and print it out. They should then put it in a DVD sleeve and go to her at some rally or something and ask her to sign it.
Man, these Republican candidates are really making it easy who I want to win.
If you ban porn every ones just going to be wanking to peoples facebook pictures or something.
[editline]9th July 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=No Party Hats;31010273]You can choose who you like.[/QUOTE]
Really? I wish I knew this, I would choose to find desperate fat women attractive if I could.
[img]http://www.alan.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/B0012561.jpg[/img]
Why am I not surprised that she looks like a rabid, psychotic soccer mom?
Oh right because they're always the ones crazy/stupid enough to do this shit.
this will so fail but people (the usual stupid people) will believe she can shut down a billion dollar industry so they'll vote for her... Can't wait to move out of america fucking place is falling apart.
What dumb shit is running her campaign? She announces her candidacy and THEN does everything she can to lose votes.
[QUOTE=Splarg!;31016077]What dumb shit is running her campaign? She announces her candidacy and THEN does everything she can to lose votes.[/QUOTE]
She gets vote from the crazy side?
[QUOTE=GeneralFredrik;31016395]She gets vote from the crazy side?[/QUOTE]
Okay, she'll pick up a few more crazies, but she's a House Representative. You'd think there'd be someone standing next to her saying "um, this [i]might[/i] completely destroy your chances of winning."
[QUOTE=Splarg!;31016610]Okay, she'll pick up a few more crazies, but she's a House Representative. You'd think there'd be someone standing next to her saying "um, this [I]might[/I] completely destroy your chances of winning."[/QUOTE]
I'm going to laugh my fucking ass off if one of these republicans wins the elections though.
lol ban porn in USA? That's like saying people should not be allowed to own guns and have free speech!
No point laughing at her policy, she has to become president first.
See Obama may not be the best president ever to some people ( personally i think he's good ) but he's a damn sight better than all the contenders who've come up against him so far.
[QUOTE=Source;31018113]See Obama may not be the best president ever to some people ( personally i think he's good ) but he's a damn sight better than all the contenders who've come up against him so far.[/QUOTE]
But but but he's a socialist chirstian-hating muslim commie black panther-supporting antichrist!
I personally laugh at people when they say he's the worse president ever.
It's like, with what reason? Sure there are worse. Like Jackson, the man was responsible for a native american Holocaust.
[QUOTE=Nikota;31018315]I personally laugh at people when they say he's the worse president ever.
It's like, with what reason? Sure there are worse. Like Jackson, the man was responsible for a native american Holocaust.[/QUOTE]
The man responsible for the trail of tears: Exactly who I want on my currency.
[QUOTE=Splarg!;31016610]Okay, she'll pick up a few more crazies, but she's a House Representative. You'd think there'd be someone standing next to her saying "um, this [i]might[/i] completely destroy your chances of winning."[/QUOTE]
I think it's more of a publicity stunt. Creating thousands upon thousands of people looking at who they are and as they spew their incoherent shit all over some people might actually get the word out for the party.
I doubt she picks up the GOP nomination. The moderates in the party outnumber the radicals, though the radicals are louder.
The GOP isn't stupid. They're not going to send someone so "out there" to run against Obama. They'll send someone with a chance of winning. I fully expect Mitt Romney to get the nod from the GOP.
[QUOTE=Kinversulath;31018553]I doubt she picks up the GOP nomination. The moderates in the party outnumber the radicals, though the radicals are louder.
The GOP isn't stupid. They're not going to send someone so "out there" to run against Obama. They'll send someone with a chance of winning. I fully expect Mitt Romney to get the nod from the GOP.[/QUOTE]
Nah he's mormon and supported health care.
I'm so very glad we have candidates like bachmann to focus on the real issues.
Now we have three threads on the first page of SH about the same thing.
[QUOTE=Nikota;31018813]Nah he's mormon and supported health care.[/QUOTE]
Obama's health care reform was actually modeled after the one Romney signed into law in Massachusetts.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.