Brexit: Legal steps seek to ensure Commons vote on Article 50 - Polidicks

[QUOTE=EcksDee;50644660]Would be nice to have sources. This also applies to every post you've ever made btw.[/QUOTE] If you've been following the news, you'll know these are true. Shouldn't be that hard to use google right? As you'll see, some are generalized.

[QUOTE=Boilrig;50644666]If you've been following the news, you'll know these are true. Shouldn't be that hard to use google right?[/QUOTE] really the onus should be on you to cite the sources you use.

[QUOTE=Boilrig;50644666]If you've been following the news, you'll know these are true. Shouldn't be that hard to use google right? As you'll see, some are generalized.[/QUOTE] Edited my quote up there for one of the claims at least, I cba to fucking find some populist generalized bullshit. The bonus with generalized quotes that appeal to idiots is that they don't do research.

[QUOTE=croguy;50644649]You could probably cut through a diamond with all that edge.[/QUOTE] I'll keep that in mind if I want to become a jeweler

[QUOTE=EcksDee;50644660] And also it's a misrepresentation because "Do okay" is not the same as "do better" Like 90% of this table is just such ambiguous shitty language it's not even funny. And yet you still don't have any scholarly academic sources to provide [B]LIKE THE HALF DOZEN I [/B][B] GAVE YOU.[/B][/QUOTE] I hope you understand that this isn't an argument for or against, right?

[QUOTE=Boilrig;50644712]I hope you understand that this isn't an argument for or against, right?.[/QUOTE] I don't care, it's completely dishonest to post stupid shit without doing any research, or providing any sources.

[QUOTE=EcksDee;50644721]I don't care, it's completely dishonest to post stupid shit without doing any research, or providing any sources.[/QUOTE] Totes. A before and after comparison is in your example, either dishonest due to no sources, or dishonest because it is apparently "stupid shit". It wouldn't really matter what I posted, even if I included sources as you would of replied in a similar fashion even though it isn't an argument for either side. No point just trying to please you.

[QUOTE=Boilrig;50644736]Totes. A before and after comparison is in your example, either dishonest due to no sources, or dishonest because it is apparently "stupid shit". It wouldn't really matter what I posted, even if I included sources as you would of replied in a similar fashion even though it isn't an argument for either side. No point just trying to please you.[/QUOTE] Well no if you posted any form of source whatsoever I'd go "Oh really is that what they said? What liars omg the assholes" However, I posted an article which in [B]2015[/B] stated that Cameron said "UK would be fine without EU" The (unsourced) table you posted said that before the referendum, Cameron said "UK would collapse without EU" Which of us is to be believed then? You can please me just fine, just try to put a bit more effort into your thoughts and opinions than none at all. Also legit wtf is this "No point trying to please you" shit. Like I said, I've been giving you academic source after academic source that exactly and perfectly stated, almost verbatim, how your opinions are objectively wrong based on the facts and evidence available, and you legit have ignored every single fucking one. Post me a source and I'll accept it if it's reliable, that's the difference between you and me.

[QUOTE=EcksDee;50644754]Some sort of post.[/QUOTE] Just for you, at like 4:22am, just picked 5 off the list. [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/25/french-border-deal-wont-be-affected-by-brexit-paris[/URL] [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/30/interest-rate-cut-likely-brexit-bank-of-england-mark-carney[/URL] [URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/06/29/paul-ryan-urges-new-trade-deal-with-the-u-k-but-others-say-its-too-soon/[/URL] [URL]https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/06/24/president-obama-uk-decision-leave-european-union[/URL] [url]https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/28/fall-uk-living-standards-foreign-investment-brexit-budget-recession[/url]

[QUOTE=Boilrig;50644817]Just for you, at like 4:22am, just picked 4 off the list. [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/25/french-border-deal-wont-be-affected-by-brexit-paris[/URL] [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/30/interest-rate-cut-likely-brexit-bank-of-england-mark-carney[/URL] [URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/06/29/paul-ryan-urges-new-trade-deal-with-the-u-k-but-others-say-its-too-soon/[/URL] [URL]https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/06/24/president-obama-uk-decision-leave-european-union[/URL][/QUOTE] Half of these quotes are irrelevant

[QUOTE=Boilrig;50644817]Just for you, at like 4:22am, just picked 5 off the list. [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/25/french-border-deal-wont-be-affected-by-brexit-paris[/URL] [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/30/interest-rate-cut-likely-brexit-bank-of-england-mark-carney[/URL] [URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/06/29/paul-ryan-urges-new-trade-deal-with-the-u-k-but-others-say-its-too-soon/[/URL] [URL]https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/06/24/president-obama-uk-decision-leave-european-union[/URL] [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/28/fall-uk-living-standards-foreign-investment-brexit-budget-recession[/URL][/QUOTE] Ill make this my last post on Facepunch for a year-ish since I'm shipping off to army basic tomorrow. Calais border: France never said it would fuck with the borders, brexit would however fuck with border control and [URL="http://news.sky.com/story/1715456/what-would-brexit-mean-for-immigration"]expats on both the UK and British side. [/URL] Actually changing where the border is would be a fucktardedly huge uptaking, as you know. It's also counter-productive, since right now the UK has options in how to deal with migrants since they know how and where they're generally coming in from, but leaving the EU means more undocumented immigration and less options to send them back. 2: "“In my view, and I am not prejudging the views of the other independent MPC members, the economic outlook has deteriorated and some monetary policy easing will likely be required over the summer,” - Carney in [B]your article[/B] He's most definitely not saying "The UK will do good outside the EU". His point is that the UK can survive just fine, as everyone thinks it will. Just it would objectively survive better in the EU, as per the sources I've given you. Third article isn't the US saying that "The UK is front of the line" for trade deals, it's Paul Ryan calling for "a new trade agreement to ensure “a smooth” relationship after the country parts ways with the European Union." No mention at all about if this new deal is better or worse than their previous arrangement (hint, it's gonna be worse, as per the sources I've given you) Obviously they're not going to abandon the UK since it's a fairly big economy, but still, the EU is a BIGGER economy, and if they can get a better deal with the EU than with the UK alone (highly likely) then they'll leave the UK to the back of the line. Fourth is a whitehouse statement in which Obama doesn't say anything about "The UK being fine outside the EU" What he said is "We will continue working with London and Brussels to ensure economic stability", which is politi-speak and honestly doesn't factor in how capitalism in general works. It's all fine and dandy to say you'll work with London, but if business owners find it easier and more profitable to deal with the EU, that's what they'll do. Fifth I don't even know. Is there any point to you posting an article which is pretty heavily against brexit and mentions the inevitable economic downturn of the UK actually leaving the EU?

[QUOTE=EcksDee;50645036]Ill make this my last post on Facepunch for a year-ish since I'm shipping off to army basic tomorrow[/QUOTE] Have fun in boot matey, don't reinact full metal jacket ;0

[QUOTE=Boilrig;50644817]Just for you, at like 4:22am, just picked 5 off the list. [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/25/french-border-deal-wont-be-affected-by-brexit-paris[/URL] [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/30/interest-rate-cut-likely-brexit-bank-of-england-mark-carney[/URL] [URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/06/29/paul-ryan-urges-new-trade-deal-with-the-u-k-but-others-say-its-too-soon/[/URL] [URL]https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/06/24/president-obama-uk-decision-leave-european-union[/URL] [url]https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/28/fall-uk-living-standards-foreign-investment-brexit-budget-recession[/url][/QUOTE] really glad you couldnt vote