• Women Are Better at Everything
    380 replies, posted
[QUOTE=dgg;30811324]But it's simply the truth. I'm not saying women are so much better than men and oh my god are we stupid fucks. I think that shit is just as stupid as the rest. But if you read the rest of that post then it's simply a fact. Women can live on without men. Men can't live on without women. Thus they are superior.[/QUOTE] women aren't naturally able to reproduce without men, only through breakthroughs in science is this possible unless women are born with the innate ability to reproduce without males i don't see this as a reason that females are superior saying one gender/sex is superior to another is fucking [b]stupid[/b]
[QUOTE=thisispain;30811738]hi i'm soaringscout i make redundant statements and don't care about the standards of comedy[/QUOTE] Good god you are so whiny.
[QUOTE=SoaringScout;30811904]Good god you are so whiny.[/QUOTE] well yes i am known to enjoy the pleasures of wine but that's besides the point just because it's a joke doesn't mean you should laugh at them or defend them in the name of comedy because some jokes are shit and if you don't stop people from telling them they'll just say more shitty jokes and that totally kills my buzz
[QUOTE=thisispain;30811925]well yes i am known to enjoy the pleasures of wine but that's besides the point just because it's a joke doesn't mean you should laugh at them or defend them in the name of comedy because some jokes are shit and if you don't stop people from telling them they'll just say more shitty jokes and that totally kills my buzz[/QUOTE] You do realize that sexist jokes aren't meant to be taken seriously. I don't even know of that many females that get pissed over sexist jokes.
Ann Coulter.
[QUOTE=Kopimi;30811894]women aren't naturally able to reproduce without men, only through breakthroughs in science is this possible unless women are born with the innate ability to reproduce without males i don't see this as a reason that females are superior saying one gender/sex is superior to another is fucking [b]stupid[/b][/QUOTE] Science is also a part of nature, unless you are implying humans aren't part of nature. But I know what you mean, which I cover in the next paragraph. And the fact that it's possible is what makes them superior, it doesn't matter HOW, it matters that it's possible. Women have always been able to breed with eachother, they've just lacked the tools to do so up until now. And I have no idea how that isn't innate since they have the materials they need for it from the moment they were born. They just lack the tools and knowledge in how to do it which have been discovered.
[QUOTE=dgg;30812116]Science is also a part of nature, unless you are implying humans aren't part of nature. But I know what you mean, which I cover in the next paragraph. And the fact that it's possible is what makes them superior, it doesn't matter HOW, it matters that it's possible. Women have always been able to breed with eachother, they've just lacked the tools to do so up until now. And I have no idea how that isn't innate since they have the materials they need for it from the moment they were born. They just lack the tools and knowledge in how to do it which have been discovered.[/QUOTE] Damn, there's more to life than reproduction. If chick want to fuck themselves, then whatever. I wouldn't really call that superior.
[QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;30812533]Damn, there's more to life than reproduction. If chick want to fuck themselves, then whatever. I wouldn't really call that superior.[/QUOTE] ... What the hell? I'd call it a superior sex if it's able to live on it's own when the other sex is in every way dependent on the opposite sex. That's all it needs to be able to do to be a superior sex. How they perform in jobs, social life and IQ doesn't matter, biological differences causes the different sexes to have different interests on the broad scale causing different jobs and occupations where they excel the opposite sex. They are still both fully capable of being the #1 in any of those three categories and it's million subcategories. There we're only talking about advantages. In reproduction women don't have an advantage, they have an unique ability that man can't have.
[QUOTE=PvtCupcakes;30812533]Damn, there's more to life than reproduction. If chick want to fuck themselves, then whatever. I wouldn't really call that superior.[/QUOTE] it's glaringly obvious that you have no grasp on biology you should keep your ignorance to yourself rather than being purposely disagreeable
[QUOTE=SoaringScout;30811990]You do realize that sexist jokes aren't meant to be taken seriously. I don't even know of that many females that get pissed over sexist jokes.[/QUOTE] i'm not pissed off because it was a sexist joke i'm pissed off because it's a shit joke and as an lover of comedy i am offended by his extreme lack of a sense of humour
women can make sandwiches for me better than men can.
[QUOTE=thisispain;30814435]i'm not pissed off because it was a sexist joke i'm pissed off because it's a shit joke and as an lover of comedy i am offended by his extreme lack of a sense of humour[/QUOTE] I'm just going to assume you are being satirical.
[QUOTE=Sanius;30785774]"Kill all niggers. Of course I'm just kidding."[/QUOTE] Fine, you want extremes? In the context of your analogy the title of this article is "Kill all crackers *reasons*" to which I replied "Kill all niggers *joke reasons that mock article*". Not so out of place now. But somehow my comment is offensive but the article is not. Plus, judging from all your comments in this thread you seem like a pissed off chick. Why so mad? After all you are better at everything than men. That reminds me, would you mind making me a better-than-I-could-make sandwhich? Thanks, you're the best.
[QUOTE=dgg;30812836]... What the hell? I'd call it a superior sex if it's able to live on it's own when the other sex is in every way dependent on the opposite sex. That's all it needs to be able to do to be a superior sex. How they perform in jobs, social life and IQ doesn't matter, biological differences causes the different sexes to have different interests on the broad scale causing different jobs and occupations where they excel the opposite sex. They are still both fully capable of being the #1 in any of those three categories and it's million subcategories. There we're only talking about advantages. In reproduction women don't have an advantage, they have an unique ability that man can't have.[/QUOTE] So herms are the next step in evolution? :v:
[QUOTE=Swilly;30816227]So herms are the next step in evolution? :v:[/QUOTE] a bright future
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;30816387]a bright future[/QUOTE] Of massive confusion.
[QUOTE=Swilly;30816428]Of massive confusion.[/QUOTE] and 50% more meatspin
[QUOTE=Aspen;30816453]and 50% more meatspin[/QUOTE] So what happens to the women who want to be men?
[QUOTE=Swilly;30816862]So what happens to the women who want to be men?[/QUOTE] a good time
[QUOTE=Slight;30815677]Plus, judging from all your comments in this thread you seem like a pissed off chick. Why so mad? After all you are better at everything than men. That reminds me, would you mind making me a better-than-I-could-make sandwhich? Thanks, you're the best.[/QUOTE] if you ever find yourself wondering why you're so lonely, refer back to this post
[QUOTE=Swilly;30816862]So what happens to the women who want to be men?[/QUOTE] Plastic surgery + mechanical strap-ons. [editline]1st July 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Swilly;30816227]So herms are the next step in evolution? :v:[/QUOTE] Not really since they only contain female chromosomes. There is no male involved at all. With hermaphrodites you have one gender with both reproduction organs or one gender that turns into the other at a later stage. Hehe, thinking of it we are all in the plainest technical way hermaphrodites as we all start out as women in the womb and then develop into men afterwards. But since we aren't capable of re-producing inside the womb you could of course not label us as such.
[QUOTE=dgg;30817017]Plastic surgery + mechanical strap-ons. [editline]1st July 2011[/editline] Not really since they only contain female chromosomes. There is no male involved at all. With hermaphrodites you have one gender with both reproduction organs.[/QUOTE] Oh I wonder what freakshows will come outta that process. I'd love to see the depression as well. [editline]30th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=dgg;30817017]Plastic surgery + mechanical strap-ons. [editline]1st July 2011[/editline] Not really since they only contain female chromosomes. There is no male involved at all. With hermaphrodites you have one gender with both reproduction organs or one gender that turns into the other at a later stage. Hehe, thinking of it we are all in the plainest technical way hermaphrodites as we all start out as women in the womb and then develop into men afterwards. But since we aren't capable of re-producing inside the womb you could of course not label us as such.[/QUOTE] Indeed. [editline]30th June 2011[/editline] Although thinking of it, few species given their long lifetimes actually have gotten rid of their male counterparts. There must be a reason, however it could no longer exist for humans because we ignore our natural roots for the most part. [editline]30th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=dgg;30817017]Plastic surgery + mechanical strap-ons. [/QUOTE] Good sir, I do believe you're missing the the testosterone treatments that come with becoming a male. You cannot in good faith think plastic surgery and a mechanical starp on will be all that is needed without making some people extreme irate.
[QUOTE=Swilly;30817067]Although thinking of it, few species given their long lifetimes actually have gotten rid of their male counterparts. There must be a reason, however it could no longer exist for humans because we ignore our natural roots for the most part.[/QUOTE] Well old habits ain't going away in a day, and evolution is a slow slow process. But just the fact that there are female-only species out there says more than enough. Try find a male-only species. I don't see how humans ignore their natural roots. Our intelligence is just part of who we naturally are. Us inventing things is part of our nature. We didn't invent things by mistake, we used our natural given brains. It's what we're meant to do. There is nothing unnatural about science. Science is built up on natural things, but often natural things combined by force to create new materials. The only reason we refer to not natural things is because nature itself wouldn't have produced them, it's just for organization, but the fact that they can be produced proves more than enough that it is natural. [QUOTE=Swilly;30817067]Good sir, I do believe you're missing the the testosterone treatments that come with becoming a male. You cannot in good faith think plastic surgery and a mechanical starp on will be all that is needed without making some people extreme irate.[/QUOTE] We got pills for that. Okay then, give them some balls and a good paint-over. Also naturally with a mechanical strap-on we are talking about a strap-on that acts and feels like the real thing and can of course be controlled and used in the same way.
[QUOTE=dgg;30817416]Well old habits ain't going away in a day, and evolution is a slow slow process. But just the fact that there are female-only species out there says more than enough. Try find a male-only species. I don't see how humans ignore their natural roots. Our intelligence is just part of who we naturally are. Us inventing things is part of our nature. We didn't invent things by mistake, we used our natural given brains. It's what we're meant to do. There is nothing unnatural about science. Science is built up on natural things, but often natural things combined by force to create new materials. The only reason we refer to not natural things is because nature itself wouldn't have produced them, it's just for organization, but the fact that they can be produced proves more than enough that it is natural. We got pills for that. Okay then, give them some balls and a good paint-over.[/QUOTE] Or just make them guys... Seriously the day that we don't men, we can have operations to [B]MAKE[/B] men.
[QUOTE=Swilly;30817441]Or just make them guys...[/QUOTE] And how are you going to do that? Put them in an artifical womb?
[QUOTE=dgg;30817447]And how are you going to do that? Put them in an artifical womb?[/QUOTE] look at how far surgery has come along, soon they'll be able to have synthetic balls that actually work and function like real ones. Soooo, the male half of our species isn't going to die for a long time especially because of transgendered people. Humans also have a tendency to save the weaker links compared to other species. [editline]30th June 2011[/editline] It'd be an interesting experiment to see if they'd actually start acting like both genders with the lack of men. Holy shit, why do I sound like a nazi?
[QUOTE=Swilly;30817466]look at how far surgery has come along, soon they'll be able to have synthetic balls that actually work and function like real ones. Soooo, the male half of our species isn't going to die for a long time especially because of transgendered people. Humans also have a tendency to save the weaker links compared to other species.[/QUOTE] But wouldn't that just produce Y chromosomes since it's a woman? Doesn't help if you look and act like a male if your chromosomes are still fully woman. You will have transgendered women, not men in any way but the looks and possibly testosterones. Won't change the fact that it's all woman in the DNA. Yeah, we are pathetic like that. It's okay if they are able to do anything. But saving the ones that aren't capable of taking care of themselves? Talk about self-masturbation over how great and caring you are, so caring you devote your life to keep a vegetable alive just to make it smile every now and then, if it's capable to, just to live with the good feeling of having done something you consider a great deed. Assholes.
[QUOTE=dgg;30817579]But wouldn't that just produce Y chromosomes since it's a woman? Doesn't help if you look and act like a male if your chromosomes are still fully woman. You will have transgendered women, not men in any way but the looks and possibly testosterones. Won't change the fact that it's all woman in the DNA. Yeah, we are pathetic like that. It's okay if they are able to do anything. But saving the ones that aren't capable of taking care of themselves? Talk about self-masturbation over how great and caring you are, so caring you devote your life to keep a vegetable alive just to make it smile every now and then, if it's capable to, just to live with the good feeling of having done something you consider a great deed. Assholes.[/QUOTE] Who's to say sex changing operation don't get to a point where women can actually become men and men can become women? We're talking far off and we're speculating but that doesn't change the fact it is actually possible.
[QUOTE=Swilly;30817611]Who's to say sex changing operation don't get to a point where women can actually become men and men can become women? We're talking far off and we're speculating but that doesn't change the fact it is actually possible.[/QUOTE] Well there is of course the possibility of storing male chromosomes and making a form of breeding farm of them so that you can have a more or less infinite supply of them ready to inserted into the body replacing one of your other Y chromosomes inside an artificial womb. Man, the future is going to be great. I'm happy to be here when it's all new and the start and all that jazz. But as a person living here now I'd rather live some hundred or thousand years in the future. I mean goddamn, we've gotten this far in just a bit over 100 years where the most new stuff started churning out 50 years ago. We can say all we want about all new inventions just being upgrades of previous inventions. But then you just stop and think for a moment and start looking at what's going on and how fast it's ACTUALLY been produced (seeing as it seems to take forever for any progress to be done, but that's just because we've already adjusted to the current rate) and it's a blow to the face. Warcraft III still feels like it just came out a few years ago, but noooo, it came out 7 years ago.
[QUOTE=dgg;30817626]Well there is of course the possibility of storing male chromosomes and making a form of breeding farm of them so that you can have a more or less infinite supply of them ready to inserted into the body replacing one of your other Y chromosomes inside an artificial womb. Man, the future is going to be great. I'm happy to be here when it's all new and the start and all that jazz. But as a person living here now I'd rather live some hundred or thousand years in the future. I mean goddamn, we've gotten this far in just a bit over 100 years where the most new stuff started churning out 50 years ago.[/QUOTE] I don't know...I like being a guy to be honest :v: And I'd probably be one of those women getting that operation if I was alive then.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.