Time Magazine puts photo of woman breast feeding, Moms all over the world get butthurt because kid i
97 replies, posted
[QUOTE=AceOfDivine;35925759]Wincest, tits are tits, who gives a shit.[/QUOTE]
You would have sexual desires over your own mother if she was 'fit'?
How very freudian.
[QUOTE=AceOfDivine;35925607]Wouldn't he get high-fived instead for getting such hot titty?[/QUOTE]
Unless his friends are into incest, no.
[QUOTE=Drsalvador;35925415]except cow milk lacks the nutrients required for healthy infant development, why do you think forumla exists?[/QUOTE]
If you're old enough to walk to the fridge and take the cow milk, chances are you are no longer an infant.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;35925821]Unless his friends are into incest, no.[/QUOTE]
Sucking on your own mom's tits might not sound right, but sucking on someone else's fuck yeah!
[QUOTE=AceOfDivine;35925832]Sucking on your own mom's tits might not sound right, but sucking on someone else's fuck yeah![/QUOTE]
except we are talking about his mum's so people would make a big deal out of it
[QUOTE=AceOfDivine;35925832]Sucking on your own mom's tits might not sound right, but sucking on someone else's fuck yeah![/QUOTE]
Now the interesting freudian observation would be... do you want to do that for your pleasure or hers?
Judging my your fervent excitement over the matter. I reckon its for your enjoyment.
[img]http://images.suite101.com/253805_freudsigmundmednndb400.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Afrika;35925986]Now the interesting freudian observation would be... do you want to do that for your pleasure or hers?
Judging my your fervent excitement over the matter. I reckon its for your enjoyment.
[/QUOTE]
How about both? It's not like it's rape or anything
[QUOTE=AceOfDivine;35926022]How about both? It's not like it's rape or anything[/QUOTE]
Rape you say? How very interesting indeed.
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/Sigmund_Freud_1926.jpg/220px-Sigmund_Freud_1926.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Dominicus;35924417]3 years is a bit long but who the hell cares? It's her goddamned child, let her do with it what she wants so long as it doesn't make the kid an ax-murderer.[/QUOTE]
He'll be throwing people through the moon door before long.
[QUOTE=Dominicus;35924417]3 years is a bit long but who the hell cares? It's her goddamned child, let her do with it what she wants so long as it doesn't make the kid an ax-murderer.[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah it will totally not fuck up his vision of education and the picture will totally not follow him for the rest of his life.
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;35926325]Oh yeah it will totally not fuck up his vision of education and the picture will totally not follow him for the rest of his life.[/QUOTE]
That seems severely unlikely. I would be very surprised if the breastfeeding continues for much longer and this is hardly something that people will remember a couple months from now, much less when the kid reaches his middle school years.
I think everyone should just calm down, the kid's only fucking three years old. Yeah Most children stop suckin the tit before then, but this one hasn't so fuckin' what. He's THREE. It's not like he's corrupted or will be
[editline]12th May 2012[/editline]
Besides, I'm 26, and I'd suck her tits
[QUOTE=JeanLuc761;35926666]That seems severely unlikely. I would be very surprised if the breastfeeding continues for much longer and this is hardly something that people will remember a couple months from now, much less when the kid reaches his middle school years.[/QUOTE]
Never underestimate the internet.
Oh wow, that is umm, interesting.
To be honest, I can honestly say I've no idea how to respond to this. Maybe I'll just fap to it like I do all the other weid shit I come across on the internet.
The fact that she's put that picture on cover of Time is much worse than her breast feeding habits. How's that kid going to feel when he grows up and sees that?
maybe if she keeps going he'll get old enough to think of the line
"hey mom can we give you a shot of chocolate syrup in your boobs so I can have chocolate mom milk"
Looking from a purely biological view, breastfeeding that long isn't needed. Milk serves to pass antibodies and helps boost the infants immune system. It's also the sole food source until the infant is able to start eating and digest solid food. At that point, the child has a somewhat established immune system and doesn't need milk. This is when the mother starts weaning off the child. 'Course, the mother/child/infant could be any mammalian species.
Point is, I think she has issues to keep him on the tit this long.
[QUOTE=Raptor_Girl;35927311]Looking from a purely biological view, breastfeeding that long isn't needed. Milk serves to pass antibodies and helps boost the infants immune system. It's also the sole food source until the infant is able to start eating and digest solid food. At that point, the child has a somewhat established immune system and doesn't need milk. This is when the mother starts weaning off the child. 'Course, the mother/child/infant could be any mammalian species.
Point is, I think she has issues to keep him on the tit this long.[/QUOTE]
There are other, less understood, benefits to breast feeding.
A chemical reaction occurs in both the brain of the mother and child during breast feeding that is thought to form the mother/child bond, but is likely considerably more complicated than that.
Globally and historically speaking, breast feeding through the age of 3 isn't terribly uncommon.
There's actually a huge difference between the US Time Magazine and the rest of the world. I don't think this was on the cover anywhere outside the US.
[QUOTE=GunFox;35928764]There are other, less understood, benefits to breast feeding.
A chemical reaction occurs in both the brain of the mother and child during breast feeding that is thought to form the mother/child bond, but is likely considerably more complicated than that.
Globally and historically speaking, breast feeding through the age of 3 isn't terribly uncommon.[/QUOTE]
From what I've observed in animals, it calms both mother and offspring. While breastfeeding though age 3 isn't uncommon globally and historically, it really isn't needed at this point in developed countries. I could see it having use in less developed countries.
just imagine being 30 and trying to be taken seriously while everyone remembers you as the kid who at age 3 was sucking his mums tit on Time Magazine
i don't envy him because that would suck
I was happily bottle-fed.
[QUOTE=thisispain;35928904]just imagine being 30 and trying to be taken seriously while everyone remembers you as the kid who at age 3 was sucking his mums tit on Time Magazine
i don't envy him because that would suck[/QUOTE]
That's some immature group of people you're imagining.
[QUOTE=AceOfDivine;35929019]That's some immature group of people you're imagining.[/QUOTE]
Oh please. If I knew someone who years ago was on the cover of a worldwide popular magazine sucking their mothers tit inbetween solid food meals I would seriously enjoy the endless supply of jokes it could provide.
[QUOTE=Afrika;35929068]Oh please. If I knew someone who years ago was on the cover of a worldwide popular magazine sucking their mothers tit inbetween solid food meals I would seriously enjoy the endless supply of jokes it could provide.[/QUOTE]
You're part of the immature crowd, okay I get that.
[QUOTE=AceOfDivine;35929019]That's some immature group of people you're imagining.[/QUOTE]
basically a group of people like me.
we suck
Why would anyone say this is sexual? This is a fucking child feeding from his mother, there is absolutely nothing less sexual than that. Anyone who views breasts solely as a sexual object are pretty fucked up people.
Holy shit. This was on my radio and people thought it was utterly disgusting that the kid was 3. It's actually healthy that she's gone this long, and some kids breast feed up until they're 4-5 (and in a few cases, kids were breast feeding at age 9.) I can't see why this is getting so much controversy. Let her do what she thinks is right.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.