Teacher, 43, 'gave her 8th grade student oral sex in her classroom' - Is the kid lucky? You decide - Polidicks

[QUOTE=Aidan_088;44351262]Why is it exploitative by nature? I agree there is the potential for exploitation but I do not see why it must always occur when one person is beneath x age and one person is above x age. Can a man with a gun not date an unarmed woman? Having power and exercising power is not the same thing.[/QUOTE] It is exploitative be nature because there exists a massive devlopmental and power imbalance between, say, a 15 year old and a 20+ year old, especially if they are in a position of power like this teacher. The teenager is going through puberty, learning the ropes of their developing body, and is flowing with hormones, while the 20+ year old isn't. And that's just if they [i]aren't[/i] being malicious, and if you're 25 and still going after high-school girls then I honestly have doubts that you're of the purest intentions. As for the fact that people aren't fully developed until their 20s, if you can't see that there exists a BIG difference between, eg, you at 14 and you now either you're still a teenager, a massive manchild or deliberately being obtuse. Personally I'm fine with Canadian age of consent laws. AOC is 16, 18 if one person is in a position of power over the other, and there are plenty of close-in-age exeptions. They aren't perfect, (for example anal sex is illegal until you're 18 in most provinces), but what can you do? [editline]25th March 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Jookia;44353983]Isn't most the damage done by society's reaction to such events?[/QUOTE] This idea is based off of an "interesting" interpretation (favoured by NAMbLA and co.) of a study that ACTUALLY says that most abused children don't actually realize that they've been abused until later in their lives when they finally understand what happened to them AFAIK.

fuck no. Id think she was a methhead if i saw her on the street.

[QUOTE=CapellanCitizen;44354325]This idea is based off of an "interesting" interpretation (favoured by NAMbLA and co.) of a study that ACTUALLY says that most abused children don't actually realize that they've been abused until later in their lives when they finally understand what happened to them AFAIK.[/QUOTE] Interesting, thanks for the explanation. I don't understand why you rated my question dumb though?

[QUOTE=Jookia;44354403]Interesting, thanks for the explanation. I don't understand why you rated my question dumb though?[/QUOTE] Sorry about that. I've changed it. It's just a reaction to all of the frustrating child abuse apologia in this thread.

[QUOTE=The golden;44350768]Sexual assault cases with a female perpetrator always bring out the absolute lowest FP has to offer...[/QUOTE] Normally I'm the one taking the side that they should be punished to the fullest extent, but I believe that age of consent should be FAR lower especially considering the IMMENSE punishment rape carries (or usually immense), we should be more strict with what constitutes rape. Banging a consenting 15 year old, male or female, is by far not the same thing as pinning someone down and raping them. [editline]25th March 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=SgtCr4zyGunz;44353130]So what? You were a hormonal teenager going through puberty. If a fully grown adult in a position of authority exploits that in order to get their rocks off they are doing something criminal.[/QUOTE] I don't understand this logic at all. The person wants to get their rocks off, someone wants to get their rocks off, both people want the other to get their rocks off, done deal.

[QUOTE=CapellanCitizen;44354325] This idea is based off of an "interesting" interpretation (favoured by NAMbLA and co.) of a study that ACTUALLY says that most abused children don't actually realize that they've been abused until later in their lives when they finally understand what happened to them AFAIK.[/QUOTE] I assume you are speaking about Bruce Rind's famous 1998 meta-analysis? If so that is a gross misrepresentation of its findings. The abstract summarizes it well; "Many lay persons and professionals believe that child sexual abuse (CSA) causes intense harm, regardless of gender, pervasively in the general population. The authors examined this belief by reviewing 59 studies based on college samples. Meta-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. However this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, FE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became nonsignificant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported. ." [url]http://digilib.bc.edu/reserves/sc563/mcgu/sc56310.pdf[/url] I suggest you look at the actual study and the various follow-up studies rather than creating bizarre narratives surrounding them based on hearsay.

I rather stick my dick in a blender...or some hunk's ass :zoid:

[QUOTE=KD007;44354151]I'm sorry, but after clicking on the link with high hopes, and seeing her face... He should have fucked her from the rear LOL[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Mudbone;44354374]fuck no. Id think she was a methhead if i saw her on the street.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Sir Drone;44358626]I rather stick my dick in a blender...or some hunk's ass :zoid:[/QUOTE] you guys aren't funny

[QUOTE=Fatfatfatty;44350022]Niccce[/QUOTE] It's a burning shame that not everyone will get this reference. Boxes inbound.

I think the fact that he wanted it as a 15 year old is what makes it more exploitative imo. When I was 15 I wouldn't have turned down fucking anything, it wouldn't matter how much I really wanted that I would literally not say no to banging. The way I think of it is like with the whole bestiality thing. Horny dogs will hump anything but if you fuck a horny dog it's still bad because you're taking advantage of the fact that there's a big intellectual difference there. She wasn't blowing this kid because she legitimately saw a future with him or even saw him as a sexual equal. She was blowing him (probably) because she has some sort of mrs Robinson fantasy about having horny teenage boys fawn over her

Not gonna lie, I was extremely hormonally induced when I was 15. So by applying anecdotal experience to this situation I have come up with the conclusion that I would've loved to have sex with a reasonably attractive female teacher at 15. Say what you want, but when biological reproductive urges consume you, you just wanna fuck something.

[QUOTE=God of Ashes;44350051]Except she's in a position of power and he's a vulnerable very impressionable child[/QUOTE] I'm not convinced a 15 year old is a "vulnerable and impressionable child". He is not a mature adult, but to say at 15 he couldn't possibly have known anything about what he wanted is insulting.

[QUOTE=The golden;44350768]Sexual assault cases with a female perpetrator always bring out the absolute lowest FP has to offer...[/QUOTE] what do you expect from the site that is the official forum for garry's mod and Rust?

[QUOTE=The Baconator;44363355]what do you expect from the site that is the official forum for garry's mod and Rust?[/QUOTE] Rust is the main offender for bringing new people to FP

[QUOTE=Ricool06;44350215]It wasn't consensual. You have to be 16 to give legal consent.[/QUOTE] ok so if 2 15y/o kids have sex then theyre both raping eachother?? SH at its finest.

[QUOTE=Chubbs;44363822]ok so if 2 15y/o kids have sex then theyre both raping eachother?? SH at its finest.[/QUOTE] I think it would be legal in the Netherlands at least.

[QUOTE=FlakAttack;44361143]I'm not convinced a 15 year old is a "vulnerable and impressionable child". He is not a mature adult, but to say at 15 he couldn't possibly have known anything about what he wanted is insulting.[/QUOTE] People act like 15-year-olds are equivalent to 10-year-olds brain-power wise. Funfact: They aren't.

[QUOTE=FlakAttack;44361143][B]He is not a mature adult[/B][/QUOTE] Yo then that's all that needs to be said. At best this is unethical and at worst yeah it's a crime. Would you all be ok with this if it was a 43 year old man and a 15 year old girl cuz if not you'd be massive hypocrites.

Why can't shit like this happen to me?

[QUOTE=Valiantttt;44363847]I think it would be legal in the Netherlands at least.[/QUOTE] I would be pretty worried if it was illegal anywhere tbh. That's the point I was trying to make.

[QUOTE=Chubbs;44363822]ok so if 2 15y/o kids have sex then theyre both raping eachother?? SH at its finest.[/QUOTE] We've already discussed this. No.