• Religion is not a choice but being gay is, GOP leader’s spokesman says
    481 replies, posted
I think we can all learn something from this thread Pascall can learn from the gay rights activists that there are indeed examples of homo animals We can learn from Pascall that while there are probably homo dogs, just because one humps another dude dog doesn't mean it is gay, it is more like prison rape And we can all agree that the actual causes of homosexuality are complicated and not fully understood by skientists, and that while sexuality is not necessarily immutable, people don't usually get to choose who they are attracted to Anyone who disagrees with me is stupid and should be punched
That's true, but Pascall is implying there is no such thing as homodawgs.
Maybe she had a bad experience with homo dogs and blocked them out
the gay penguin couple in the san fransisco zoo broke up :( One of them decided he was straight.
[QUOTE=TH89;17939817]Maybe she had a bad experience with homo dogs and blocked them out[/QUOTE] I guess that explains why she's so dumb.
[QUOTE=Trotsky;17939598]That's true, but Pascall is implying there is no such thing as homodawgs.[/QUOTE] Oh, get over it already. I'm not in emotional distress because someone on the internet called me dumb.
[QUOTE=Pascall;17939883]Oh, get over it already. I'm not in emotional distress because someone on the internet called me dumb.[/QUOTE] No, you are because of bad experiences with homodawgs.
[QUOTE=Elstumpo;17939904]No, you are because of bad experiences with homodawgs.[/QUOTE] You're not cool. You came in late.
[QUOTE=Pascall;17939911]You're not cool. You came in late.[/QUOTE] Thanks for informing me, love.
[QUOTE=Pascall;17939911]You're not cool. You came in late.[/QUOTE] What?
[QUOTE=Elstumpo;17939924]Thanks for informing me, love.[/QUOTE] Np. Anyways: I appreciate the effort you guys are taking to offend me or drive me away, but I'm not an idiot and I realiize that this is the internet. I will never meet you people and therefore have nothing to prove. So maybe I don't know what I'm talking about. Neither does half of the retards on this forum. I've studied and worked with dogs of all breeds for five years and I still stand by my statement. Make all the jokes you want about "homodawgs". Come and find me when you find some viable proof of a male dog buttfucking another; not because it's "doggy pr0nz" (you're pretty immature if you can't watch a natural process without applying rule 34), but because it's the one way to prove homosexuality in a domesticated male dog. Unless you have some way of digging into the canine psychological thought process and translating it in a manner than humans can comprehend. I'll take that too. Thanks.
You don't need to prove that to some kids on the internet. If any of this really didn't matter to you, you wouldn't have to announce it to the whole world now would you? Keep your cool, yeesh. [editline]12:43AM[/editline] But talking about patterns of homosexuality in mammals other than humans is interesting. Why stop now?
[QUOTE=billeh!;17940000]You don't need to prove that to some kids on the internet. If any of this really didn't matter to you, you wouldn't have to announce it to the whole world now would you? Keep your cool, yeesh.[/QUOTE] I'm not. Lol. Just stating what I think and informing them that if they have the means to prove me differently, then to let me know. Since all they seem to be doing is saying "ur wrong". edit: at least about the homosexuality in canines.
[QUOTE=The golden;17940046]But the same has to be applied to you too. You also need to provide evidence and backing to your side of the debate.[/QUOTE] The first site I provided a few pages back was an article, albeit from a source that is not well known. Written by Rena Murray who has been one of Florida’s most effective Dog Obedience Trainers and Dog Behaviorists. The second, I agree, was not very viable. edit: [url]http://www.pets.ca/articles/article-dog-humping.htm[/url] Another article. Didn't read this one the whole way through but here's an excerpt: [quote]In some wild wolf packs, the only members of the pack that are allowed to mate are the alpha female and the alpha male and mating between subordinates is discouraged. The goal is to have enough resources and care for the pups and ultimately, the entire pack. “Humping” behavior in dogs serves two purposes. The first is the obvious need to reproduce. [b]The second purpose behind such behavior is to exert dominance onto another dog. A dog will only tolerate this mounting behavior if he/she views that the dog doing the mounting is above him/her in rank. This subordinate dog can be of either sex, which is why it is not uncommon to see a male dog humping another male dog.[/b][/quote] Like I said, unless someone can prove that there is actual penetration going on, they can't really prove that the dog is indeed a homosexual. Dogs don't have the concept of "attraction". They may form close bonds with others of the same sex, but that does not point towards homosexuality. Isn't homosexuality all about attraction in the first place? I'm not gay, so I couldn't exactly say that this is true, but that's what it seems like.
here's an easy way to prove a dog is homosexual: he has sex with a dude dog [quote]Dogs don't have the concept of "attraction".[/quote] you're dumb get out
[QUOTE=Doriol;17940175]here's an easy way to prove a dog is homosexual: he has sex with a dude dog you're dumb get out[/QUOTE] Have you seen a male dog penetrate another? I doubt it. Also, no, a dog does not have that concept. Dogs don't give a shit what they fuck. If you put a female dog in heat in front of an un-neutered male dog, they will attempt to procreate. The male dog doesn't care that the female doesn't have blue eyes or isn't as "pretty" as another dog. Another reason they may attempt to have sex with a male dog is because of sexual frustration. No females around? Do a dude. It's not because they prefer male dogs. [url]http://www.shamsali.org/taj/gay-animals.html[/url] Another article. [quote]Their natural instincts still remain, and at the appropriate for them season they become sexually excited, just as they would have been in the wild. But a dog living alone in a human family is not a wolf in a pack of wolves, it is totally dependant on its human master. Its master might arrange a mating session with some other dog, but what if he does not? The mating instinct is still there, and one might observe dogs deprived of the possibility of satisfying their natural instinct in the natural way, attempting to "have sex" with its owner's shoe, or any other object the size and shape of which is remotely reminiscent of a dog. And if, when taken for a walk, it meets a dog of the same sex, it will try to "have sex" with that dog, or even with some different animal of appropriate size and shape. But does this mean that such dog is "homosexual"? Would such dog prefer to "have sex" with a dog of the same sex or its owner's shoe, rather than having a normal relationship with a dog of the opposite sex, if it had access to one? The answer is clearly: "No, it would not". What we are observing in such cases is an animal driven by normal natural instinct, but being unable to satisfy it in the normal natural way, satisfying it in an unnatural way due to the unnatural circumstances. Yes, animals can be forced to perform "homosexual" acts, by depriving them from the possibility to perform their reproductive functions in the natural way. It is also possible to teach animals to have sex with humans. But it does not follow from this that animals are naturally "homosexual". All it means is that animals are not free - they are driven by their instincts. The purpose of these instincts is to enable the animals to live for a certain limited period of time and during that period to produce offspring, which will ensure that the particular animal species survives from generation to generation. But, when the external conditions are such that this purpose cannot be achieved, the animal cannot make a choice over its actions, but continues to be driven by its instincts, without achieving their intended purpose. But the difference between a man and an animal is that Man has reason which he uses to control his instincts and urges. Rather than being driven by his instincts, he can make conscious decisions which can be either to his benefit or to his loss.[/quote] tl;dr: Dogs do not have the same psychological thought process that humans do.
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_attraction[/url]
[QUOTE=Doriol;17940242][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_attraction[/url][/QUOTE] Okay, let me rephrase what I meant. Dogs do not have the same concept of physical attraction that we do. Meaning, appearance-wise. Sexual attraction, yes. Every mammal does.
Isn't physical attraction interchangeable with sexual attraction?
yes
[QUOTE=billeh!;17940264]Isn't physical attraction interchangeable with sexual attraction?[/QUOTE] Ugh. It's too late for me to be articulate. Anyways, I'm talking about appearances specifically. I mean, you could like the way someone looks, but that doesn't mean you want to fuck 'em. edit: You know what. Nevermind. You guys can read the articles yourselves and believe in fagdogs all you want. I'm going to bed because I have classes in the morning. This topic isn't going anywhere anyways. Night.
[QUOTE=The golden;17940312]Unless you're a dog, I'm going to have to call bullshit simply because: How the hell do you know? Thank you.[/QUOTE] Same goes for everyone saying different. How do they know? Like I said, topic can't go anywhere.
[QUOTE=Pascall;17940016]I'm not. Lol. Just stating what I think and informing them that if they have the means to prove me differently, then to let me know. Since all they seem to be doing is saying "ur wrong". edit: at least about the homosexuality in canines.[/QUOTE] While there's something to this, when you consider the well-documented examples of homosexuality in any number of other species, it seems unlikely that dogs are the exception. And your evidence is both limited and anecdotal, so it's not unreasonable to believe in homodogs.
Good god what happened here
homodogs took over
[QUOTE=TailsPrower;17940628]Good god what happened here[/QUOTE] I'm looking at you, mr. homo dawg.
[QUOTE=TH89;17847834]Uh yes you do [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals[/url][/QUOTE] [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/Males_Anas_platyrhynchos_2_.jpg[/img] D'awwww! [editline]07:58AM[/editline] [QUOTE=The golden;17922101]Fucking religion. Seriously, just fuck that pile of steaming bullshit.[/QUOTE] You'd like that wouldn't you
[QUOTE=Pascall;17939980]Np. Anyways: I appreciate the effort you guys are taking to offend me or drive me away, but I'm not an idiot and I realiize that this is the internet. I will never meet you people and therefore have nothing to prove. So maybe I don't know what I'm talking about. Neither does half of the retards on this forum. I've studied and worked with dogs of all breeds for five years and I still stand by my statement. Make all the jokes you want about "homodawgs". Come and find me when you find some viable proof of a male dog buttfucking another; not because it's "doggy pr0nz" (you're pretty immature if you can't watch a natural process without applying rule 34), but because it's the one way to prove homosexuality in a domesticated male dog. Unless you have some way of digging into the canine psychological thought process and translating it in a manner than humans can comprehend. I'll take that too. Thanks.[/QUOTE] Your idea of proof of he contrary is a source that calls humping "bad manners" you're delaing with a form of genetics, homosexuality, that is present in all animals like humans. [editline]01:25PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Pascall;17940226]Have you seen a male dog penetrate another? I doubt it. Also, no, a dog does not have that concept. Dogs don't give a shit what they fuck. If you put a female dog in heat in front of an un-neutered male dog, they will attempt to procreate. The male dog doesn't care that the female doesn't have blue eyes or isn't as "pretty" as another dog. Another reason they may attempt to have sex with a male dog is because of sexual frustration. No females around? Do a dude. It's not because they prefer male dogs. [url]http://www.shamsali.org/taj/gay-animals.html[/url] Another article. tl;dr: Dogs do not have the same psychological thought process that humans do.[/QUOTE] Holy shit you're retarded. Shamsali... seriously? [editline]01:26PM[/editline] wow, you are seriously, really fucking retarded.
well this went to shit really fast. as if anyone thought that it wouldnt.
[QUOTE=Trotsky;17935788]Oh dogs aren't gay, they just have poor manners :saddowns:[/QUOTE] Their penises look like little tubes of lipstick
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.