• Cannabis Reduces Infant Mortality
    505 replies, posted
[QUOTE=SgtCr4zyAlt;23133557]morphine isn't exactly safe but it's used all the time as a painkiller.[/QUOTE] That's in overdoses which is rare unless you're using it illegally. So it's only been proven safe SO FAR?
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133586]That's in overdoses which is rare unless you're using it illegally. So it's only been proven safe SO FAR?[/QUOTE] To assume that anything is 100% safe no matter what is ignorant, there's always a chance of another study finding something that nobody noticed before.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133586]That's in overdoses which is rare unless you're using it illegally. So it's only been proven safe SO FAR?[/QUOTE] oh if we're talking overdoses then why not let weed in since you need to smoke about 15,000 pounds of the stuff to get cannabis poisoning. why would something that hasn't killed anyone in the history of forever suddenly be dangerous all of the sudden. you can say that about ANY prescription drug.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133586]That's in overdoses which is rare unless you're using it illegally. So it's only been proven safe SO FAR?[/QUOTE] Nothing is 100 percent safe, breathing is dangerous, even when not smoking or breathing in any particulate matter like dust or asbestos or anything at all, because the very air you breather, even it was pure atmosphere is slowly killing you because Oxygen poisons eukaryotic life an you breathe in oxygen radicals and other radicals.
[QUOTE=SgtCr4zyAlt;23133640]oh if we're talking overdoses then why not let weed in since you need to smoke about 15,000 pounds of the stuff to get cannabis poisoning. why would something that hasn't killed anyone in the history of forever suddenly be dangerous all of the sudden. you can say that about ANY prescription drug.[/QUOTE] That's what they said about cigarettes and coke. Once again. It's needs to be legal, but we need to know exactly what it is capable of before we just start selling it everywhere. [editline]10:01PM[/editline] [QUOTE=bravehat;23133643]Nothing is 100 percent safe, breathing is dangerous, even when not smoking or breathing in any particulate matter like dust or asbestos or anything at all, because the very air you breather, even it was pure atmosphere is slowly killing you because Oxygen poisons eukaryotic life an you breathe in oxygen radicals and other radicals.[/QUOTE] Oxygen is not Weed You need air to live.
[QUOTE=SgtCr4zyAlt;23133640]oh if we're talking overdoses then why not let weed in since you need to smoke about 15,000 pounds of the stuff to get cannabis poisoning. why would something that hasn't killed anyone in the history of forever suddenly be dangerous all of the sudden. you can say that about ANY prescription drug.[/QUOTE] Note that by time you smoked the amount you would need to OD on you would have already passed out or it would have exited your system bringing the amount down.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133664]That's what they said about cigarettes and coke. Once again. It's needs to be legal, but we need to know exactly what it is capable of before we just start selling it everywhere. if it killed people or had serious long term effects, we would have seen them by now. [editline]10:01PM[/editline] Oxygen is not Weed You need air to live.[/QUOTE] millions of people use weed. it being legalized is going to suddenly make it more dangerous, what are you high on. [editline]05:02PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Lambadvanced;23133680]Note that by time you smoked the amount you would need to OD on you would have already passed out or it would have exited your system bringing the amount down.[/QUOTE] yeah i was going to mention it was also physically impossible.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133664]That's what they said about cigarettes and coke. Once again. It's needs to be legal, but we need to know exactly what it is capable of before we just start selling it everywhere. [editline]10:01PM[/editline] Oxygen is not Weed You need air to live.[/QUOTE] We've done considerably more tests, and weed has been in the public since forever pretty much where cocaine and cigarettes were introduced at the same time they claimed them to be safe And it's still harmful to you even if you need it
[QUOTE=SgtCr4zyAlt;23133709]millions of people use weed. it being legalized is going to suddenly make it more dangerous, what are you high on. [editline]05:02PM[/editline] yeah i was going to mention it was also physically impossible.[/QUOTE] Implying weed isn't possibly dangerous in the first place. [editline]10:04PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Lambadvanced;23133717]We've done considerably more tests, and weed has been in the public since forever pretty much where cocaine and cigarettes were introduced at the same time they claimed them to be safe And it's still harmful to you even if you need it[/QUOTE] If it's to be legalized and given to the public then it needs to be safe first. Arguing in a forum isn't going to change any of this.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133751]Implying weed isn't possibly dangerous in the first place.[/QUOTE] >implying weed is dangerous even though its been scientifically tested numerous times. to say "but something COULD turn up" is ignorant and illogical because you can say this about any medical drug ever used. if things given to the public need to be safe, why are cigarettes legal?
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133751]Implying weed isn't possibly dangerous in the first place. [editline]10:04PM[/editline] If it's to be legalized and given to the public then it needs to be safe first. Arguing in a forum isn't going to change any of this.[/QUOTE] Everything is possibly dangerous. Lets ban everything. And you've gone from saying that it should be used only for medicinal to saying that it can be dangerous, are you saying we should only allow sick people and people in pain to use something that can kill them? If you wait for something to be 100% proven safe before allowing people to get it then nothing would ever be allowed to the public
[QUOTE=Lambadvanced;23133791]Everything is possibly dangerous. Lets ban everything. And you've gone from saying that it should be used only for medicinal to saying that it can be dangerous, are you saying we should only allow sick people and people in pain to use something that can kill them?[/QUOTE] Some things are more dangerous than others. Your logic is shit. Yes. Have you forgotten morphine already?
Oh lack of weed makes you unhappy. Whoever said that, can go suck a cock. Why? Because 100% that he is unhappy when there is no internet avaliable. See the connection? That is called mental addiction.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133809]Some things are more dangerous than others. Your logic is shit. Yes. Have you forgotten morphine already?[/QUOTE] implying weed is more dangerous than cigarettes and alcohol. whose logic is shit
[QUOTE=kobilica;23133819]Oh lack of weed makes you unhappy. Whoever said that, can go suck a cock. Why? Because 100% that he is unhappy when there is no internet avaliable. See the connection? That is called mental addiction.[/QUOTE] Implying a mental addiction could never happen with weed.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133809]Some things are more dangerous than others. Your logic is shit. Yes. Have you forgotten morphine already?[/QUOTE] You're the one that said morphine is only dangerous in large doses (see: ODing), but claim that we haven't proven that weed is safe in small doses. In layman's terms, I'm implying that you're supporting poisoning the sick and the weak because the poison can help them before killing them.
[QUOTE=SgtCr4zyAlt;23133842]implying weed is more dangerous than cigarettes and alcohol. whose logic is shit[/QUOTE] We don't use cigarettes and alcohol for medicinal usage. Yours is.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133852]Implying a mental addiction could never happen with weed.[/QUOTE] I see no implication of that. I see him saying that weed is strictly mentally addicting.
[QUOTE=Lambadvanced;23133856]You're the one that said morphine is only dangerous in large doses (see: ODing), but claim that we haven't proven that weed is safe in small doses. In layman's terms, I'm implying that you're supporting poisoning the sick and the weak because the poison can help them before killing them.[/QUOTE] To be honest with you, killing off large quantities of stupid people wouldn't be bad for the earth.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133900]To be honest with you, killing off large quantities of stupid people wouldn't be bad for the earth.[/QUOTE] Lets start with idiots. Off you go!
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133873]We don't use cigarettes and alcohol for medicinal usage. Yours is.[/QUOTE] implying weed is more dangerous than morphine, then
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133809]Some things are more dangerous than others. Your logic is shit. Yes. Have you forgotten morphine already?[/QUOTE] For fuck sake, breathing oxygen is guaranteed death, 100% death, no escape. We should ban breathing because it kills people. And actually breathing around petrol is more dangerous than weed is in any way shape or form thanks the oil/petrol/diesel being carcinogenic and having carcinogenic compounds added to the oil to increase/decrease its octane number.
[QUOTE=Lambadvanced;23133899]I see no implication of that. I see him saying that weed is strictly mentally addicting.[/QUOTE] And there are a good amount of weak willed easily addictive people in the United States. Keeping it from them without a regulation is safer.
[QUOTE=bravehat;23133947]For fuck sake, breathing oxygen is guaranteed death, 100% death, no escape. We should ban breathing because it kills people. And actually breathing around petrol is more dangerous than weed is in any way shape or form thanks the oil/petrol/diesel being carcinogenic and having carcinogenic compounds added to the oil to increase/decrease its octane number.[/QUOTE] Your right we should just breath Weed instead. Oxygen is our only choice of survival, you breath it, you age, you die. It's fucking life.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133948]And there are a good amount of weak willed easily addictive people in the United States. Keeping it from them without a regulation is safer.[/QUOTE] implying we need to protect people from themselves.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133948]And there are a good amount of weak willed easily addictive people in the United States. Keeping it from them without a regulation is safer.[/QUOTE] And then you take away their right to decide what goes into their body.
[QUOTE=Lambadvanced;23134001]And then you take away their right to decide what goes into their body.[/QUOTE] If we didn't do that, people would be dropping like flies. Your right legalize cocaine because I have a right to put what I want in my body. [editline]10:15PM[/editline] [QUOTE=SgtCr4zyAlt;23133974]implying we need to protect people from themselves.[/QUOTE] People are stupid, so yes.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23133948]And there are a good amount of weak willed easily addictive people in the United States. [B]Keeping it from them without a regulation is safer.[/B][/QUOTE] Totally wrong, it's unregulated you can't tell who's getting it, you make really good weed and sell it cheap and regulate it you know exactly who is getting it, and if it's accepted and regulated by the government if people are having problems caused by them becoming addicted to the drug they can come forward and ask for help kicking the habit without fearing jail time or fines or other shit.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23134035]If we didn't do that, people would be dropping like flies. Your right legalize cocaine because I have a right to put what I want in my body.[/QUOTE] implying legalizing coke will make thousands of people do coke and die. yes you SHOULD have a right to snort coke if you want to, it may be irresponsible but it's not anyone else's business.
[QUOTE=yodafart9;23134035]If we didn't do that, people would be dropping like flies. Your right legalize cocaine because I have a right to put what I want in my body. [editline]10:15PM[/editline] People are stupid, so yes.[/QUOTE] You're the one saying that killing off a large number of people isn't bad, so who gives a shit? As long as they're aware that it's their choice, and they don't harm anybody in the process, who cares if they die from a drug overdose, at least they died doing something they enjoyed.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.