Obama is basically president - Let's post in this thread about the election result.
384 replies, posted
Man, I have absolutely no idea what the fuck you're talking about :downs:
I have found my zen
[QUOTE=ArchAngel]REBUTTAL, motherfuckers!
I think the big problem is that the material is so involved. The proof is demonstrative and illustrative. This whole pdf is one big illustrative essay, basically, and has no real obligations of proof other than illustration which is where thisispain is fundamentally wrong (and which my material provides in ABUNDANCE).
There are five or six examples given in the text of the pdf, of introductory paragraphs of Obama's speeches and other snippets. These are all analyzed in-depth, several pages to each paragraph dedicated to searching out hypnotic constructs within the paragraphs. All methodology is acceptable within the field of psychology... I don't know why thisispain has suddenly decided that hypnotherapy is witchcraft v:)v
Anyway, suppositions are made, but these are rational suppositions, and they are two: one, we are working within the field of Ericksonian hypnotherapy and the terms and methodology used within is legitimate and effective, and two, Omama's desire is to be President of the United States, and his actions on the campaign trail are a manifestation of this desire.
With just these two rational suppositions, we lay the foundation for a rational set of ideas which support themselves and are intertwined.
Why does the expository, illustrative, demonstrative nature of my material make it any less legitimate? It works within a legitimate, proven field and draws its material from the very same. Its suppositions are rational and the conclusions drawn from this are sound when working within its proven field.[/QUOTE]
Post summed up as: I believe it so it must be true.
That's not proof.
Do we have to go over this again go to sleep
[QUOTE=thisispain]Post summed up as: I believe it so it must be true.
That's not proof.
Do we have to go over this again go to sleep[/QUOTE]
I'll try it again.
The proof is demonstrative in this fashion: the document informs the reader, shows Obama's speeches within the context of Ericksonian hypnotism, and allows reader to draw conclusion. All of the proof is in the later sections with the segments of speeches and the analyses.
The proof is legitimate in that it operates within the proven field of hypnotherapy. The methods described do work - not the things that the document describes Obama doing. The details about the hypnosis itself. That is legitimate. It works. It has been proven. To disagree with that is to disagree with medicine, not me.
[QUOTE=ArchAngel]I'll try it again.
The proof is demonstrative in this fashion: the document informs the reader, shows Obama's speeches within the context of Ericksonian hypnotism, and allows reader to draw conclusion. All of the proof is in the later sections with the segments of speeches and the analyses.
The proof is legitimate in that it operates within the proven field of hypnotherapy. The methods described do work - not the things that the document describes Obama doing. The details about the hypnosis itself. That is legitimate. It works. It has been proven. To disagree with that is to disagree with medicine, not me.[/QUOTE]
Ugh.
So your point is what exactly?
Okay, I won't get into this too far, but honestly, of course you see evidence of him hypnotizing people if you look this hard. You're completely over-analyzing everything he's saying, and it would probably be healthiest for you to give it up. The methods of hypnosis they discuss are used by almost every politician. It's simply called - a speech. Its goals - to lull the listener into a lower state of awareness in which they are more agreeable to what you have to say. Just because this thing labels a lot of sources and is more than 50 pages long doesn't give it any credibility whatsoever. There are theories for the Earth being flat that are over two hundred pages with dozens of times more sources than that.
It's probably easier for you to believe all this because you probably aren't fully grown yet, and your parents are conservative, but the theory that Obama is somehow utilizing overt hypnotic practices other than normal inspirational speaking is ridiculous and you should see that if you think about it. Anyway, I'm not reading any more of that document because I already know a good deal about hypnosis and the claims in it are preposterous. I'll try not to respond, so I can stay out of this but... shit I'm afraid I may have got myself in too deep.
[QUOTE=wind8ws]He quit smoking before he started the campaign.[/QUOTE]
He still bummed a few here and there during the campaign, said so in a Men's Health interview I believe.
[QUOTE=Greeman]Fucking hell this election is also healing the tension between Whites and Blacks in the US after hundreds of years of discrimination, We are all coming together for a righteous cause and Race does not keep most of us divided in this election, why can't you just let that be.[/QUOTE]
If you want to stop racial animosity go hug a black person. You want the nation to be a better place you vote for who you think is the best leader.
If you're confidant that person is Obama, then you leave it at that. You don't add a little bit about how there needs to be "healing", the election doesn't serve to "heal", it serves to give us someone to [i]lead.[/i]
[QUOTE=Greeman]I don't know where you live but around here Blacks and Whites were hugging and dancing together when Obama won.[/QUOTE]
We must've been looking at different elections. I got a phone call from a friend saying there were black panthers outside a school and saw nothing but tribal drums and black people talking about "the unity of their people" on the news. I've still yet to find anyone white excited about who won, and this state went to Obama.
You don't "heal" by saying "Okay guys, it's your turn."
You heal by saying "We'll apply the rules we want in place to ourselves first" and then act as you want others to act. Not by cheering about "your people", but by disregarding race as unimportant- that's what we want, isn't it? Race not being a factor anymore...then people need to stop acting like theirs needs an evened score. All that does is prove you still do judge based on race, and no "healing" ever happens.
[QUOTE=Roboticist]He still bummed a few here and there during the campaign, said so in a Men's Health interview I believe.
If you want to stop racial animosity go hug a black person. You want the nation to be a better place you vote for who you think is the best leader.
If you're confidant that person is Obama, then you leave it at that. You don't add a little bit about how there needs to be "healing", the election doesn't serve to "heal", it serves to give us someone to [i]lead.[/i]
We must've been looking at different elections. I got a phone call from a friend saying there were black panthers outside a school and saw nothing but tribal drums and black people talking about "the unity of their people" on the news. I've still yet to find anyone white excited about who won, and this state went to Obama.
You don't "heal" by saying "Okay guys, it's your turn."[/QUOTE]
Then there's something wrong with the [i]whiteys[/i] in your state.
I am british and I was happy to see Obama elected but I was disgusted when I heard that alot of Americans were wanting to kill Obama for beating old man Mccain.
[b]Edit:[/b]
The colour of his skin should not at all change who votes for him and why. Saying that I bet alot of the Black people of America voted for him mainly because he is black.
[QUOTE=The Famous 8]I am british and I was happy to see Obama elected but I was disgusted when I heard that alot of Americans were wanting to kill Obama for beating old man Mccain.
[b]Edit:[/b]
The colour of his skin should not at all change who votes for him and why. Saying that I bet alot of the Black people of America voted for him mainly because he is black.[/QUOTE]
Well, over 90% of black people vote Democratic anyway, the percentage didn't exactly change a whole lot. If anything, you could say more people voted at all because he was black, though. Which isn't a bad thing, really. I think everyone should vote, it's just that when you live in the inner city it's a painstaking procedure that can take over 3 hours, and for some people that means sacrificing an entire days pay, which many cannot afford.
[quote=Roboticist]He still bummed a few here and there during the campaign, said so in a Men's Health interview I believe.[/quote]
I'm sure he did.
It doesn't really matter.
Didn't say it made him a worse person, just throwing out trivia for laughs.
obama is doing a terrible job as president so far
[QUOTE=nono345]obama is doing a terrible job as president so far[/QUOTE]
He's not president yet you idiot.
[QUOTE=nono345]obama is doing a terrible job as president so far[/QUOTE]
"Obama is a sucky president."
"He's not the president yet you douche."
"Oh, ok.
...
Fuck, I can't believe how bad a president Obama is.
He's the president now, right?"
He starts the job in January, I'm Northern Irish and I know that. /facepalm
[QUOTE=MisterM]He starts the job in January, I'm Northern Irish and I know that. /facepalm[/QUOTE]
And besides you have to wait a year or 2 for any real results. A week is too short to say he did anything. This is the American Government we're talking about.
[QUOTE=KC_Fox]And besides you have to wait a year or 2 for any real results. A week is too short to say he did anything. This is the American Government we're talking about.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Wikipedia]Having won a decisive victory in the United States presidential election of 1932, and with his party having decisively swept Congressional elections across the nation, Roosevelt entered office with unprecedented political capital. Americans of all political persuasions were demanding immediate action, and Roosevelt responded with a remarkable series of new programs in the “first hundred days” of the administration, in which he met with congress for 100 days. During those 100 days of lawmaking, Congress granted every "request" Roosevelt asked.
[/QUOTE]
History be good readings.
[QUOTE=R3conmaster]History be good readings.[/QUOTE]
Damn Teddy Roosevelt, that tax and spend liberal with his darn progressive tax system...
[QUOTE=Sam Tilgan]He's going to destroy America and it's constitution. Just you people watch.
I would also like to congratulate the general media for not reporting a single bad thing about Obama the entire campaign, covering up everything that might damage him, while giving him enough praise to make most people's eardrums burst.[/QUOTE]
CONGRATS! You win a complmentary tinfoil hat.
aw man I'm glad he won
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Stupid bump" - JohnnyMo1))[/highlight]
Any news on who won?
Fucking newbies.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.