Trump revealed highly classified information to Russian foreign minister and ambassador - Polidicks

taking bets on sean spicer budd dwyering it during the press conference

[QUOTE=Snapster;52233728]I wonder why trump hasn't tweeted yet. someone must be holding onto it through these tough times.[/QUOTE] He's too busy throwing a tantrum to glue together three different sentences, each less than five words long, and with a few exclamation points thrown in.

[QUOTE=Snapster;52233728]I wonder why trump hasn't tweeted yet. someone must be holding onto it through these tough times.[/QUOTE] I would literally cut off my finger if somebody at the White House weren't physically restraining Trump from accessing Twitter right now.

[QUOTE=-nesto-;52233653]And you continue to believe that Trump is a traitor and guilty of treason because the media tells you so. Getting a bit pot n kettle there man. In 2017 you're delusional if you want actual evidence instead of faceless hearsay. What a time to be alive.[/QUOTE] This shit has been going on for months. Multiple members of Trump's inner circle have Russian ties. Trump himself has a long history of doing business with Russians and hosting Russian connected individuals within his hotel. Multiple individuals have been dropped for those ties. There's a full bore FBI investigation in the works and he recently fired the man in the best position to further that investigation, and one of the big catalysts for that investigation ramping up was the fact that Trump and his team were in contact with Russian elements throughout the election cycle Don't you think you should be at least a little bit fucking suspicious at this point considering how long it has been going on? [editline]I'll bet these links get dismissed for being Reddit posts[/editline] [url=https://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/667f4q/trump_has_deep_links_to_organized_crime_federal/dgghvl8/?context=3]Like seriously[/url], [url=https://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5hx4vz/electors_demand_intelligence_briefing_before/db3m64v/]there's an awful lot[/url] [url=https://np.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5i63d1/40_electoral_college_members_demand_briefing_on/db5or6d/]of sketchy shit[/url]

[QUOTE=-nesto-;52233653]In 2017 you're delusional if you want actual evidence instead of faceless hearsay. What a time to be alive.[/QUOTE] You don't need named sources to have a legitimate story.

[QUOTE=rilez;52233780]You don't need named sources to have a legitimate story.[/QUOTE] He's not gonna stop repeating himself and ignoring your arguments, you might as well be arguing with wystan about torture. Best thing you can do is ignore him.

I can't fucking wait until the whole thing comes crashing down and most of the administration gets either locked up or disgraced out of public service forever. I'm mad as hell, and I want these bastards to feel my wrath along with the wrath of nearly the entire country.

[QUOTE=-nesto-;52233653]And you continue to believe that Trump is a traitor and guilty of treason because the media tells you so. Getting a bit pot n kettle there man. In 2017 you're delusional if you want actual evidence instead of faceless hearsay. What a time to be alive.[/QUOTE] Let's talk about evidence. You're claiming that all of these independent sources are untrustworthy because anonymous sources are inherently untrustworthy. The logical conclusion of this isn't that people are just following WaPo on this for a quick buck because these half-dozen or so news agencies would have too much to lose. The logical conclusion then is that many different news agencies across at least two different countries got together and fabricated a lie in a coordinated strike in an extremely risky move to attack Trump personally. This isn't some GameJournosPro shit, this is the big leagues; mass collusion on the part of the biggest, most reputable names in journalism in a totally unprecedented move. What is your proof that this conspiracy is real?

[QUOTE=Disgruntled;52233841]I can't fucking wait until the whole thing comes crashing down and most of the administration gets either locked up or disgraced out of public service forever. I'm mad as hell, and I want these bastards to feel my wrath along with the wrath of nearly the entire country.[/QUOTE] You seem a little...disgruntled?

People still defend Trump Why

[QUOTE=Ninja Gnome;52233748]taking bets on sean spicer budd dwyering it during the press conference[/QUOTE] Nah, he'd intentionally OD in a bush

[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;52233753]I would literally cut off my finger if somebody at the White House weren't physically restraining Trump from accessing Twitter right now.[/QUOTE] "Bannon? Melania? Has anyone seen my phone?" -cut to Pence sweating nervously-

[QUOTE=Lambeth;52232568]I trust the Washington Post to verify it with their sources even if they can't reveal who they are.That dossier that buzzfeed ended up releasing in it's entirety was actually known about in various intelligence communities but no reporter picked it up because many of the claims were difficult to verify. so yeah, I guess just trust WaPo knows what they're doing.[/QUOTE] You mean the one that said Trump had prostitutes piss on the bed Obama stayed in?

[QUOTE=theyear3535;52233898]You mean the one that said Trump had prostitutes piss on the bed Obama stayed in?[/QUOTE] Yeah. Nobody has verified that particular factoid but some of the dossier has been corroborated.

[QUOTE=Mining Bill;52233673]i can't tell if nesto is a joke, or just the punchline[/QUOTE] Not sure which would be more pathetic at this point.

[QUOTE=theyear3535;52233898]You mean the one that said Trump had prostitutes piss on the bed Obama stayed in?[/QUOTE] May 2017, pro-trump account huh

Isn't the President the head of the military anyway? Meaning he has full authority on what is and isn't classified information? And aren't meetings like these classified information, meaning the leaker would be committing a crime?

[QUOTE=theyear3535;52233938]Isn't the President the head of the military anyway? Meaning he has full authority on what is and isn't classified information? And aren't meetings like these classified information, meaning the leaker would be committing a crime?[/QUOTE] read the article [quote]The information Trump relayed had been provided by a U.S. partner through an intelligence-sharing arrangement considered so sensitive that details have been withheld from allies and tightly restricted even within the U.S. government, officials said. The partner had not given the United States permission to share the material with Russia, and officials said that Trump’s decision to do so risks cooperation from an ally that has access to the inner workings of the Islamic State.[/quote]

the information was not his to disseminate

[media]https://twitter.com/igorvolsky/status/864306427720085504[/media]

[QUOTE=Potus;52233966][media]https://twitter.com/igorvolsky/status/864306427720085504[/media][/QUOTE] Trump accepted bribes from Russia? Source? [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Didn't read the article and thread" - Kiwi))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=theyear3535;52233938]Isn't the President the head of the military anyway? Meaning he has full authority on what is and isn't classified information? And aren't meetings like these classified information, meaning the leaker would be committing a crime?[/QUOTE] Okay, I'll play. If Trump gave all the info from daily intel briefs (provided he went to them) to Putin, would that be okay? I mean, he has full authority on what is and isn't classified information so he should be able to tell anyone anything, right?

[media]https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/864305315952701446[/media]

[QUOTE=Potus;52234007][media]https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/864305315952701446[/media][/QUOTE] At that point, they would be better off just sending out daily press flyers with an FAQ... What a joke.

[QUOTE=Ltp0wer;52233994]Okay, I'll play. If Trump gave all the info from daily intel briefs (provided he went to them) to Putin, would that be okay? I mean, he has full authority on what is and isn't classified information so he should be able to tell anyone anything, right?[/QUOTE] I'm not saying it's okay, I'm saying that he did nothing illegal. Besides, with McMaster saying that no intelligence sources or methods were discussed. But I guess he is a liar and the news is always right, like how every single one of them reported that their polls showed Hillary ahead in nearly every state.

[QUOTE=Potus;52234007][media]https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/864305315952701446[/media][/QUOTE] Hannity continues to be a retard and the world goes round

[QUOTE=theyear3535;52234015]I'm not saying it's okay, I'm saying that he did nothing illegal. Besides, with McMaster saying that no intelligence sources or methods were discussed. But I guess he is a liar and the news is always right, like how every single one of them reported that their polls showed Hillary ahead in nearly every state.[/QUOTE] Yo the election is over. And regardless of what happened during the election, Trump the President has been lying out his ass almost the entire time.

[QUOTE=theyear3535;52234015]I'm not saying it's okay, I'm saying that he did nothing illegal. Besides, with McMaster saying that no intelligence sources or methods were discussed. But I guess he is a liar and the news is always right, like how every single one of them reported that their polls showed Hillary ahead in nearly every state.[/QUOTE] so who's alt are you?

[QUOTE=Mining Bill;52234027]so who's alt are you?[/QUOTE] So all new members are alts?

[QUOTE=theyear3535;52234036]So all new members are alts?[/QUOTE] So we are allowed to "doubt" the media, but we aren't allowed to doubt of new members that [I]just[/I] happen to join under strange circumstances?