[QUOTE=Terminutter;34774547]If you send Santorum to Australia, would it fix his worldview?[/QUOTE]
you can keep him, we're fine
Oh, what a feeling!
Santorum on the ceiling!
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;34777806]he's right, humankind always comes first. I can't stand environmentalists. though to be honest it sounds like his clarification was backpedaling.
also I forsee that I'm about to get a bunch of blind dumb ratings by people who didn't read the article and assume that everything Santorum touches turns to shit.[/QUOTE]
Right, you see, here's a problem.
I'm anthropocentric, however, I'm an environmentalist. And I'll tell you why they're mutually exclusive to eachother
okay?
here goes:
if the earth dies, and stay with me on this, if the planet starts to die off
so does life on said planet
I won't describe it any further. And hopefully you get my point.
Would it be naive to think we could find ways of consuming resources without putting the Earth at risk?
Global warming isn't a radical concept.
it's been around for quite a while and pretty much the entire scientific community stands behind the concept, constantly trying to find something that would rebuke it and failing.
though lack of care for the ecosystem isn't surprising coming from someone who thinks that we all go to a nice little afterlife as soon as the messiah comes around.
I actually have friends who are actively polluting since the day of reckoning is close at hand according to some-shit-in-the-bible.
[editline]20th February 2012[/editline]
I get pissed at them a lot over that. Mostly due to double standards and shit morals to future generations and shit.
Generally, christians are arrogant fucks.
So you finally looked in a mirror, Santorum?
Why do people keep saying it's not scientifically proven.
They're either stupid or being sly with words in that we haven't PROVEN it just provided a shit ton of proof.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
