Mike Flynn offers to testify in exchange for immunity - Polidicks

[QUOTE=catbarf;52036854]Okay, how about those 'reliable sources say Hillary will be indicted within the week' sorts of claims that floated around during the election? Even if it's the WSJ, a bad source is a bad source. I'm not saying it's fake but a [I]little[/I] cautious skepticism is warranted especially when it concerns something as huge as impeachment/presidential resignation.[/QUOTE] I don't remember seeing those stories at all. I only remember what Comey said. And like I said I am sceptical. Far as I am concerned this is nothing until Trump is formally charged with something. I was just pointing out that this at-least has some factual basis and some credibility unlike conspiracy-tier shit.

[media]https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/847829528072400898[/media] Huh.

[QUOTE=Big Bang;52037329][media]https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/847829528072400898[/media] Huh.[/QUOTE] What does that mean? Does that mean that Flynn wasn't going to be a reliable witness? Does this mean that he definitely had dirt on Trump?

[url]http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/senate-intelligence-committee-rejects-immunity-michael-flynn-n741061[/url] Official source. Added to op

[QUOTE=BlackMageMari;52036962]I don't remember seeing those stories at all. I only remember what Comey said. And like I said I am sceptical. Far as I am concerned this is nothing until Trump is formally charged with something. I was just pointing out that this at-least has some factual basis and some credibility unlike conspiracy-tier shit.[/QUOTE] I think everyone is somewhere on the spectrum of skeptical, some more, some less. Comparing this to hillary clinton's alien baby is absurd though.

[media]https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/847790067716427780[/media] Read between the lines. They have all the info they need.

[QUOTE=Llamaguy;52037559][media]https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/847790067716427780[/media] Read between the lines. They have all the info they need.[/QUOTE] Are you sure? I don't like reading between the lines myself. But if this is true - then Trump fucked up spectacularly by firing Yates. Not surprising in the end.

Flynn may also be attempting an Oliver North 2: Electric Boogaloo. Especially with Orange urging him on. [Media]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/847766558520856578[/media]

oh man I hope this doesn't go down like ollie north

Either this means the intelligence committee is corrupt and intentionally trying to avoid damning testimony, or Flynn doesn't have anything that the committee doesn't already have.

[QUOTE=1239the;52037648]Either this means the intelligence committee is corrupt and intentionally trying to avoid damning testimony, or Flynn doesn't have anything that the committee doesn't already have.[/QUOTE] Fucking praying so hard it's the latter.

[QUOTE=Snapster;52034921]If true. [media]https://twitter.com/Parker9_/status/847596087535861764[/media][/QUOTE] [video]https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/847807719973298177/video/1[/video] Trump as well.

[QUOTE=Llamaguy;52037559]Read between the lines. They have all the info they need.[/QUOTE] No. Assuming things in your favor is a surefire way to end up with disappointment. Didn't people learn anything during election cycle? Inreasingly Nervous Man deserves to finally rest. I'm sick of this investigation hype that very well might be going nowhere. Share and believe news when there is some ACTUAL progress being made. Otherwise you're all falling prey to political theater whose sole purpose is eroding Trump's support, like he can't do that himself.