Cambridge University students face pubic hair removal, anal rape with a bottle, and blindfolded same

[Kube]

[QUOTE=wraithcat;40889010]In most western countries you basically have two views of rape. a) only direct stimulation of genitals of one of the two people by force. (stuff like raping someone with a stick, dildo or finger would still count, as well as forced oral sex on the perpetrators penis). Or on a victim that is unable to defend themselves. - Completely KO, drunk and similar. In this legal system you will have a different crime for unwanted sexual contact without the use of force. Similarly to the difference between assault and battery. b) any unwanted sexual interaction. Regardless of the use of force. Now most laws in regards to rape are written neutrally but there used to be old Judicature which kinda did imply that rape was only male on female. But that has been changing for the past twenty or more years. It was mostly due to the views that the use of force was impossible for a female and a bunch of other stuff. But it wasn't due to legal reasons as much as due to Judicature argumentation. That said, I am certain some older laws would imply this as well.[/QUOTE] Ah, I see. I read this on Reddit earlier and in the comments someone mentioned in the UK, there law for rape is more male on female if the aggressor has a penis or something along those lines.

[TheHydra]

[QUOTE=wraithcat;40888849]Essentially my answer would go like this (law student, but in a european continental system)

couple of things that have to be kinda answered first
a) how old were the perps
b) were sexual acts like this expected
c) what kind of resistance was present - was there a vocal no, or fighting back
d) what kind of actual damage was done to richard and how much easily could it have been prevented
how old were the victims as well

and the answer if I sort of answer to myself - some sexual activity expected, all offered some consent and gilbert tried to fight it off (had to be held down)

essentially I would say more or less this
a) no crime happens
b) rape
c) possibly nothing. But it might be bodily injury with result of death large amount of fault on the side of the damaged - the thing here is, that the waxing and skin damage is a relatively minor injury and he was not prevented from seeking help at all. had he sought help, which is the thing an everyman would usually do, he would not have died.

But that said - Every law school gives similar case studies from time to time.[/QUOTE]

for number 1 the victim didn't consent to sex with jonny, who ended up sucking him off while the victim thought it was tracey. surely that's a crime?

[kebab52]

English Public Schools.

No more needs to be said.

[Spybreak]

Jesus, who wrote this exam, Chuck Palahniuk?

[bubbagamer]

Law professors seem to love twisted humor, I had to answer a few law questions asked by a man "who wants to conduct DNA tests on a man he believes is his father". Later on he "gets dumped by his wife and wants to know if he has to pay her anything". Then he figures out "he always wanted to be a girl and has a transgender operation and wants to know if he could change his sex on his ID card". At last, he "wants to marry an emancipated 17 years old boy and wonders if that's possible".

[TheHydra]

[QUOTE=Spybreak;40890353]Jesus, who wrote this exam, Chuck Palahniuk?[/QUOTE]

Sandra penetrates Gilbert’s anus with a vacuum. Although Gilbert appears to resist, and has to be held down by Tracey, he actually enjoys the experience. He later has part of his intestine sucked out and dies. Consider what offenses, if any, have been committed.