Pastor shows hardcore gay porn in church to gain support to sentence gays to death
99 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Herr Sven;20301750]Words can't describe how much I agree with you.
Well, off to start a cult of Personality!
[URL="http://www.cubeupload.com"][IMG]http://www.cubeupload.com/files/c8e000av169lg.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
All Hail![/QUOTE]
Even if you're an athiest, Dawkins is a complete twat who should NOT be anyone's role model.
[QUOTE=spengbob;20301931]Even if you're an athiest, Dawkins is a complete twat who should NOT be anyone's role model.[/QUOTE]
not really
[QUOTE=spengbob;20301931]Even if you're an athiest, Dawkins is a complete twat who should NOT be anyone's role model.[/QUOTE]
Religion critic. :eng101:
And why not? I'm a religion critic.
He knows little about religion and pretends to know a great deal.
I'd like an example.
I'd shoot dawkins in da name of christianity
[QUOTE=TailsPrower;20294918]I can't even say how stupid that is.
Oh and by the way, I'm gay, and I've cried as some of gay pornos, and not in the girly way either.[/QUOTE]
Why would you cry at porno?
He rarely shows sensible, intelligent christians on his TV programs, for example he goes to Lourdes and speaks to random people rather than confronting any person of any authority, he goes to the bible belt in america and shows all these crazy evangelicals like 'look at how dumb christians are'. He seems to think that all christians believe in creationism, and that we all have no relation to science at all. What he does not say is that most catholics believe in evolution and many other scientific theories like the big bang anyway. He blindly refuses to accept that science and religion can coincide.
[QUOTE=spengbob;20302490]He rarely shows sensible, intelligent christians on his TV programs, for example he goes to Lourdes and speaks to random people rather than confronting any person of any authority, he goes to the bible belt in america and shows all these crazy evangelicals like 'look at how dumb christians are'.[/quote]
i don't think I ever saw that. I've seen a lot of his work.
[quote]He seems to think that all christians believe in creationism,[/quote]
A lot do?
That's speculative and I'd like for you to prove he said that.
[quote]and that we all have no relation to science at all.[/quote]
Science and religion should not go together.
[quote] What he does not say is that most catholics believe in evolution and many other scientific theories like the big bang anyway. He blindly refuses to accept that science and religion can coincide.[/QUOTE]
I'd like your statistics.
They can't in anyway. The last people who tried to fuse them together formed the discovery institute.
[QUOTE=Trotsky;20302595]i don't think I ever saw that. I've seen a lot of his work.
A lot do?
That's speculative and I'd like for you to prove he said that.
Science and religion should not go together.
I'd like your statistics.
They can't in anyway. The last people who tried to fuse them together formed the discovery institute.[/QUOTE]
Saying science and religion can't be together is silly.
What are scientic theories but educational guesses of why things work the way they do.
I love how people use religion as an excuse to kill people. Now everyone knows why life sucks. Cause everyone is looking for the dumbest reasons to kill each other. >_> Seriously this just makes me wanna throw up. I agree with the guy that said the pastor needs mental help. Fucking asshole.
How does this garner any support for his cause?
[QUOTE=gfbbgfvfr;20302615]Saying science and religion can't be together is silly.
What are scientic theories but educational guesses of why things work the way they do.[/QUOTE]
They're polar opposites of each other.
Religion = Conclusion -> Something that supports it.
Science = Experiments -> Conclusions that fit the result of the experiments.
Thats one badass pastor.
[QUOTE=gfbbgfvfr;20302615]Saying science and religion can't be together is silly.
What are scientic theories but educational guesses of why things work the way they do.[/QUOTE]
Here's a scientific analysis, personified in percentile on how much you know about scientific theory: 0%
[QUOTE=gfbbgfvfr;20302615]Saying science and religion can't be together is silly.
What are scientic theories but educational guesses of why things work the way they do.[/QUOTE]
It seems really silly and contradictory. But when you think about it, a person can believe that god created the fundamentals which caused the environment for all science to develop.
But then if you really think about THAT, it does start to become a contradictory to have such a heavy interest in sciences and still blindly believe that they were at least partially created by any being because that would conflict heavily with many laws of science.
In the most basic of views yes, when thought upon the two can coexist within the same belief system. But once you critically analyse things to a much deeper degree you see that it's really nonsensical to believe in both. Just have a good hard think about it will you? Someone especially dedicated to science like Mr Dawkins can't on one hand devote his life to science and discovering more about the world and simultaneously allow for the possibility of a man in the sky who's son had superpowers that too defied science.
[QUOTE=Trotsky;20302017]not really[/QUOTE]
Dawkins is an amazingly intelligent man and a magnificent Biologist. But he just goes [i]on[/i] and [i]on[/i] about religion.
For example, in his book [i]The Selfish Gene[/i], he frequently takes sojourns from his fascinating explanation of gene-centred evolution to have a little go at religion. I remember one bit where he drew a very spurious comparison between genetics and the Bible just so he could explain that the Bible doesn't actually say Mary was a virgin but a "young woman" and that the immaculate conception refers to the idea that Mary was born without the original sin, rather than the idea that she was a virgin.
He's correct, but he doesn't need to keep talking about it.
[QUOTE=TailsPrower;20294918]I've cried as some of gay pornos[/QUOTE]
...[i]what?[/i]
[QUOTE=johanz;20294399]Since when we are returning back to dark ages?[/QUOTE]
dunno, some day back then, some dude started walking backwards while appearing to walk forwards. people went crazy and called it the moonwalk. this move was actualy stolen from conservatists and extreme religious groups. at this pace, too many are still falling over, breaking the illusion. they'll never drag the whole world back. it requires much guile and practise. think politicians who can actually do their job.
that's my thought at least.
[QUOTE=Splurgy;20303734]Dawkins is an amazingly intelligent man and a magnificent Biologist. But he just goes [i]on[/i] and [i]on[/i] about religion.
For example, in his book [i]The Selfish Gene[/i], he frequently takes sojourns from his fascinating explanation of gene-centred evolution to have a little go at religion. I remember one bit where he drew a very spurious comparison between genetics and the Bible just so he could explain that the Bible doesn't actually say Mary was a virgin but a "young woman" and that the immaculate conception refers to the idea that Mary was born without the original sin, rather than the idea that she was a virgin.
He's correct, but he doesn't need to keep talking about it.[/QUOTE]
One can hardly blame him for having a chip on his shoulder, though--he spends a significant amount of time trying to keep creationist material out of public schools. It's easy to see articles about that stuff and say "oh those crazy religious people" but there have to be people with the influence and credentials to actually fight that stuff. Dawkins is one of those people.
[QUOTE=Splurgy;20303734]Dawkins is an amazingly intelligent man and a magnificent Biologist. But he just goes [I]on[/I] and [I]on[/I] about religion.
For example, in his book [I]The Selfish Gene[/I], he frequently takes sojourns from his fascinating explanation of gene-centred evolution to have a little go at religion. I remember one bit where he drew a very spurious comparison between genetics and the Bible just so he could explain that the Bible doesn't actually say Mary was a virgin but a "young woman" and that the immaculate conception refers to the idea that Mary was born without the original sin, rather than the idea that she was a virgin.
He's correct, but he doesn't need to keep talking about it.[/QUOTE]
maybe he does, what religion needs right now is a right hard slap down their neck and a earthshaking yellout. they need to learn to behave. if you are following the book and word of goodness and mercy, you better fuck off with prosecution and unprovoked murder. if the bible ever taught us anything, it's that we're never right. people need to cool off and search and sort their ideals.
oh god, it just dawned on me.... i missed my 1337th post!!!!
BREAKING NEWS: Gay pastor sentences himself to death!
[QUOTE=MrDoctor;20308204]BREAKING NEWS: Gay pastor sentences himself to death![/QUOTE]
the day that religious fanatics apply their own insane codex on themselves rather than just everyone else is the same day that someone divides by zero, collapses the universe turning it inside out and sends us all spiraling into a deep void free of time and space.
[QUOTE=TH89;20307810]One can hardly blame him for having a chip on his shoulder, though--he spends a significant amount of time trying to keep creationist material out of public schools. It's easy to see articles about that stuff and say "oh those crazy religious people" but there have to be people with the influence and credentials to actually fight that stuff. Dawkins is one of those people.[/QUOTE]
What does concern me is that Dawkins seems to be in danger of becoming that which he's campaigning against (namely, a zealot). Honestly, it's because of him that I remain staunchly agnostic; both extremes look exactly the same, as far as I'm concerned.
Fighting fire with flamethrowers, it doesn't work.
What a ass. A proper prick.
I wonder what Pat Robertson will say about this effort in trying to build support for the Uganda bill.
[QUOTE=hamberglar;20293558]It's people like this that make me absolutely despise religion.[/QUOTE]
At this point, it has almost nothing to do with religion. As a matter of fact, doing something like that is sacrilegious. He's not only a pathetic example of a pastor, he's completely nuts!
[QUOTE=gfbbgfvfr;20302615]Saying science and religion can't be together is silly.
What are scientic theories but educational guesses of why things work the way they do.[/QUOTE]
You're right. You can say "God did it" all you want, but that does not say how God did it. Most Christians realize this (speaking from personal experience; I don't know if there are any statistics and I honestly don't care). In fact, the Catholic church openly subscribes to the theories of Charles Darwin (This is true). It's just the extreme idiots who get all of the attention.
BTW, I am not Christian.
Since when did Shirley Phelps-Roper leave America?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.