'Pedophile's Guide' author arrested in CO by Fla. detectives - Polidicks

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;26826260]"omg what evr hapened 2 free speach" Did you people actually read the fucking article? He was arrested for distribution of CP, not for the book.[/QUOTE] It's pretty stupid that the article mentions the book so much, then, if it's about him being arrested for that.

[QUOTE=chewgo;26826222][url]http://abcnews.go.com/m/screen?id=12111987[/url] Read this article. From his mouth he said that the book is about how to behave, not how to molest children.[/QUOTE] From his book he informs people about what sized condoms to buy to fit them on 13-year-old boys. I am going to have to ignore what he says about it entirely and just judge based on the actual content.

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;26826260]"omg what evr hapened 2 free speach" Did you people actually read the fucking article? He was arrested for distribution of CP, not for the book.[/QUOTE] Oh, well that clears that up. Well I can safely say thank god this guys off to rot in prison.

[QUOTE=Tropophas;26826269]Perhaps he should have wrote the book on that premise, then, because that's not what it says[/QUOTE] I suppose you've read it then? I trust the author's word on the book more than yours. I doubt you've even read it.

[QUOTE=Van-man;26826282]Like how one can buy a book to make homemade bombs? That can also be used to hurt people, and making the bombs is also illegal. Again this is a slippery slope[/QUOTE] That could be used for educational purposes, where as there won't be any courses requiring you buy a book detailing how to molest kids [editline]20th December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;26826312]From his book he informs people about what sized condoms to buy to fit them on 13-year-old boys. I am going to have to ignore what he says about it entirely and just judge based on the actual content.[/QUOTE] Ahahaha

[QUOTE=chewgo;26826292]The detective arrested him on that charge, he based the charge on the book that he got. He called that book CP.[/QUOTE] No, he didn't, they deemed the book probable cause that he has child pornography. They still can't do shit until they prove he does.

[QUOTE=chewgo;26826332]I suppose you've read it then? I trust the author's word on the book more than yours. I doubt you've even read it.[/QUOTE] Because I'm sure the author is going to incriminate himself. People like this author always tend to dilute the truth.

[QUOTE=Tropophas;26826342]That could be used for educational purposes, where as there won't be any courses requiring you buy a book detailing how to molest kids[/QUOTE] And his book could be used as a psychological study of a pedophile's mindset.

Oh. That makes sense.

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;26826367]No, he didn't, they deemed the book probable cause that he has child pornography. They still can't do shit until they prove he does.[/QUOTE] I read the article wrong, thanks for pointing that out.

[QUOTE=Thy Reaper;26826395]And his book could be used as a psychological study of a pedophile's mindset.[/QUOTE] I think the cons outweigh the pros Cons- Helps and instructs people on how to molest children Pros- Someone might use it for psychology

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;26826312]From his book he informs people about what sized condoms to buy to fit them on 13-year-old boys. I am going to have to ignore what he says about it entirely and just judge based on the actual content.[/QUOTE] Yeah I looked up what it was really about but couldn't find a clear answer, but if that's the case then I'm glad he got locked up. [editline]20th December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=chewgo;26826426]That sounds like to me that they are calling the book obscene and child porn. Maybe I read the article wrong, I'll look through it again.[/QUOTE] The way the article sounds, it seems like it's because of the actual pictures in the book.

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;26826312]From his book he informs people about what sized condoms to buy to fit them on 13-year-old boys. I am going to have to ignore what he says about it entirely and just judge based on the actual content.[/QUOTE] well said, but where did you find this out? Just looking for a source is all

[QUOTE=commander204;26826138]How the fuck is this relevant?[/QUOTE] How the fuck isn't it relevant? search on this page for "Pedophile manifesto" and press play/listen to the interview with the author "Philip Greaves". [url]http://www.kfiam640.com/common/podcast/single_page.html?podcast=JohnandKen[/url]

[QUOTE=Tropophas;26826438]I think the cons outweigh the pros[/QUOTE] I don't think child molesters are so incompetent they can't figure out how to rape a kid; this book isn't really going to cause more of that.

[QUOTE=chewgo;26826426]I read the article wrong, thanks for pointing that out.[/QUOTE] dude i said that exact fact just a second ago you didn't only read it wrong, you read it wrong multiple times

[QUOTE=FunkyHippo;26826509]How the fuck isn't it relevant? search on this page for "Pedophile manifesto" and press play/listen to the interview with the author. [url]http://www.kfiam640.com/common/podcast/single_page.html?podcast=JohnandKen[/url][/QUOTE] Pedophile manifesto oh god what

[QUOTE=Tropophas;26826342]That could be used for educational purposes[/QUOTE] Yeah, so is the pedo's handbook, if you're trying to learn how to prevent said things to happen. Using the "think like the enemy" strategy.

[QUOTE=Keeshond v2;26826467]well said, but where did you find this out? Just looking for a source is all[/QUOTE] There was an excerpt from the book. I don't have it anymore or remember where I got it but if you can find an old ITN thread about the book I posted it in one of them.

[QUOTE=Keeshond v2;26826528]dude i said that exact fact just a second ago[/QUOTE] sorry :saddowns:

[QUOTE=chewgo;26826532]Pedophile manifesto oh god what[/QUOTE] Just listen to it, Philip Greaves is either trolling or is actually fucked up in the head.

[QUOTE=chewgo;26826545]sorry :saddowns:[/QUOTE] you should be not really have a heart for saying sorry

Surely if it were a truly paedophillic book, the author would have tried to conceal it under some other name? Haven't read it or anything so I can't really judge, but it's a bit like going to the airport and joking about being a terrorist and then ending up as an actual terror suspect as a result of that.

[QUOTE=Kookas;26826760]Surely if it were a truly paedophillic book, the author would have tried to conceal it under some other name? Haven't read it or anything so I can't really judge, but it's a bit like going to the airport and joking about being a terrorist and then ending up as an actual terror suspect as a result of that.[/QUOTE] It's even worse than that, he's not joking.

[QUOTE=Kookas;26826760]Surely if it were a truly paedophillic book, the author would have tried to conceal it under some other name? Haven't read it or anything so I can't really judge, but it's a bit like going to the airport and joking about being a terrorist and then ending up as an actual terror suspect as a result of that.[/QUOTE] i think airport sec is alot more lax than they like to let people think i have mates who got through both ends (only domestic flights though) with boxcutters, small amounts of green (as in, only around .2-.3 of a gram) and other contraband items. Most of it was left in unintentionally though.

[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;26826367]they deemed the book probable cause that he has child pornography.[/QUOTE] a miscarriage of justice right there

[QUOTE=Zeke129;26826951]a miscarriage of justice right there[/QUOTE] It's not the first time probably cause has been stretched.

[QUOTE=chewgo;26826974]It's not the first time probably cause has been stretched.[/QUOTE] It's like using my ownership of a car to arrest me for drug trafficking

[QUOTE=chewgo;26826974]It's not the first time probably cause has been stretched.[/QUOTE] i don't really think it's been stretched i mean, it did get him busted for CP. And i think the book was actually a pretty good indicator y'know.. [editline]20th December 2010[/editline] no smoke without fire

[QUOTE=Keeshond v2;26826932]i think airport sec is alot more lax than they like to let people think[/QUOTE] You missed an opportunity for great pun.. shoulda capitalised the LAX for extra lulz: LAX = Los Angeles International Airport (it's the IATA code)