Activision to release 3 Call of Duty Titles in 2 years - Polidicks

Oh you lot. Just because Activision is milking the shit out of CoD doesn't mean the games are going to be [I]bad[/I]. So what if they're releasing three games in two years? They're still going to be interesting and probably very enjoyable - as all of the recent Call of Duty games are.

They're just starting to churn out generic shooters that everyone buys due to their ridiculous marketing budget.

Not this again.

[QUOTE=TheSpy;21498045]stop spamming OH GAWD BFBC2 IS SOOOOOO BETTER. back then cod was better until cod 2 came out which that game sucked. in my opinion bfbc2 isnt that fun either[/QUOTE] why is it that people of this opinion are so stupid

I hated CoD ever since they made a Modern Warfare game. I KNEW after that that that's exactly what would ruin the franchise, they really shoulda kept it to historical conflicts in the 20th century. Hell, if they did stuff like WWI, the Spanish Civil War, Russian revolution, that shit'd be interesting.

Call of Duty is gonna turn into what halo is now

[QUOTE=Lambeth;21498519]Yeah. I heard of another game a while back that was a alternate history game where germany defeated britain and was mounting a attack on north america. I wonder what happened to it.[/QUOTE] Now THAT is something that would be awesome!

Last time I checked... Their next game is most likely going to be, Call of Duty: Vietnam. I swear if it is I want this kind of scene ,and being able too ride in a Hill Billy Gun Truck. [media] [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05J3yetFmrc[/url] [/media]

[QUOTE=TippZ;21510667]Now THAT is something that would be awesome![/QUOTE] Turning point Despite nice art and crap it failed pretty hard...

[QUOTE=TippZ;21510667]Now THAT is something that would be awesome![/QUOTE] Turning Point: Fall of Liberty. Winston Churchill never gave his speech do too him getting killed by a taxi which hit him in New York. Britian got taken over cause America isolated it self from the war ,and the Nazis used London as a nuclear missile launch base/testing facility for new weapons...A few words... It was a badass game.

[QUOTE=SanderMan;21507259]I hated CoD ever since they made a Modern Warfare game. I KNEW after that that that's exactly what would ruin the franchise, they really shoulda kept it to historical conflicts in the 20th century. Hell, if they did stuff like WWI, the Spanish Civil War, Russian revolution, that shit'd be interesting.[/QUOTE] You can only do so much with WWII. I personally loved CoD4, it's just modern warfare 2's horrible camp fest that I hate.

[QUOTE=carcarcargo;21511139]You can only do so much with WWII. I personally loved CoD4, it's just modern warfare 2's horrible camp fest that I hate.[/QUOTE] Aye, I played some at my friend's house and I couldn't tell wheather I was watching an after school special or playing a game. EDIT: You were using the word "camp" as in campy, yes?

at least use a new engine, the past 3 have looked exactly the same other than the gore in COD5

[img]http://www.thedaystarisbright.com/gallery/d/549-1/beating-a-dead-horse.gif[/img]

Milking like a cow on steroids, two years after it's death.

[QUOTE=Exploits;21498303]Battlefield 2142. You're welcome.[/QUOTE] 1942 BFV fixed

Call of Duty: Time warfare NEW AND EXOTIC LOCATIONS!

[QUOTE=efeX;21498027][img]http://geekyheart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Battlefield-Bad-Company-2.jpg[/img] Sup.[/QUOTE] All the Battlefield up until 2 were good. After that, they turned to shit. That's actually how Call of Duty and Medal of Honor went too... Conspiracy? [editline]08:27PM[/editline] But it's about fucking time they made a 'nam game. I can't wait to gib Charlie into nothing. I just hope they don't tack on all that extra bullshit. Which they probably will. So meh.

[QUOTE=SanderMan;21512749]Aye, I played some at my friend's house and I couldn't tell wheather I was watching an after school special or playing a game. EDIT: You were using the word "camp" as in campy, yes?[/QUOTE] As in sitting in a corner.

[QUOTE=carcarcargo;21524982]As in sitting in a corner.[/QUOTE] That's bad too.

[QUOTE=acds;21500140]The MW name will still sell for a while, but without IW renewing the momentum (by releasing a good MW title) that momentum will wither and die, then Activision will have killed their biggest cashcow.[/QUOTE] You put too much faith in the consumers. Companies like Nintendo have been getting away with this kind of crap for years. Activision won't have any more trouble than they do.

[QUOTE=Aredbomb;21525966]You put too much faith in the consumers. Companies like Nintendo have been getting away with this kind of crap for years. Activision won't have any more trouble than they do.[/QUOTE] Until a new major series come Look at halo initially it was all "OMG HALO IT'S SO KEWL" Then MW2 cam along and now halo has been pushed into the corner with call of duty being the big franchise The only thing to do if you want less call of duty is wait for the next truely big game

Call of Duty: Office Warfare

Call of Duty: Legal Warfare Can't wait :)

Infinity Ward was the heart and soul of the Call Of Duty series. All of Treyarch's were based on Infinity Ward's work. World at War was pretty much a re-skin of COD4 except with overpowered tanks and zombies.

Call of Duty WW1 Call of Duty Civil War Call of Duty Cold War Call of Duty SPEESHE MAHREENES Call of Duty French and Indian War

Activision are stupid.

I don't know why the Activision hate train has started so late. They have been a terrible company to work for forever.

I think it's safe to say that the CoD franchise will be dead and gone at this rate.

:crying: