• Donald Trump Accused of Rape in Federal Court Lawsuit
    88 replies, posted
To everyone asking "why now", [url=http://heavy.com/news/2016/04/donald-trump-jeffrey-epstein-katie-johnson-lawsuit-accused-rape-teen-girl-sex-slave-documents-pdf/]this source[/url] says the suit was filed in April, but then thrown out in May for failing to state a civil rights claim. It was either refiled just or now or this is really old news.
Where is Bezo's dirt bounty money going if he didn't find out about this?
[QUOTE=J!NX;50562148]imagine how fucked up it would be if trump was ruled as guilty for rape and clinton was ruled as guilty for her stuff oh my god what a MESS this is[/QUOTE] Basically Brazil right now
[QUOTE=person11;50562501]they all have receding hairlines and/or large foreheads[/QUOTE] Theyre all old
[QUOTE=Perrine;50562605][i]Well,[/i] [thumb]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d2/Nydailynewsjan152016.jpg/800px-Nydailynewsjan152016.jpg[/thumb] [thumb]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/85/New_York_Daily_News_cover_June_8%2C_2016.jpg[/thumb] Also, that's the same site that published the PTSD gun blog post as news[/QUOTE] so what makes these people different from the NY post? Also, if we allow news from such biased left wing sources why not just allow breitbart in SH?
Reminds me of how [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_Strauss-Kahn]Dominique Strauss-Kahn[/url]'s career just basically died after [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._Strauss-Kahn]rape allegations surfaced[/url]. While their veracity of the woman's statement was questioned and proven to be too inconsistent to hold up in court, leading to a dismissal of the case, his career went down the shitter and he was never able to recover. A bunch more people came out of the woodworks at around the same time also claiming they had been raped by the same man, further adding insult to injury. Point being that this sure as fuck isn't the first time someone is trying to fuck up a politician's career with rape allegations. DSK's case was just the tip of the iceberg as far as he was concerned though since the guy had a more than dubious life surrounding his political career.
[QUOTE=person11;50562501]they all have receding hairlines and/or large foreheads[/QUOTE] wow you're in for a rough time in ten to twenty years
[QUOTE=Fourier;50562824]True, innocent until proven guilty. But 20 years.. will be hard to prove anything[/QUOTE] She doesn't have to prove anything. Regardless of whether or not its true, which I hope to God its not because nobody deserves that, Trumps campaign is going to suffer as a result. If the objective was justice for being raped those years ago, then good luck. If the objective was actually just to damage Trump, then she's already won.
[QUOTE=S31-Syntax;50567256]She doesn't have to prove anything. Regardless of whether or not its true, which I hope to God its not because nobody deserves that, Trumps campaign is going to suffer as a result. If the objective was justice for being raped those years ago, then good luck. If the objective was actually just to damage Trump, then she's already won.[/QUOTE] Eh, you think Trump supporters are really going to waiver in support that much from this allegation? Check the above posts. You'll find loads of Trump supporters completely dismissing this as merely nothing else but smear tactics.
[QUOTE=S31-Syntax;50567256]She doesn't have to prove anything. Regardless of whether or not its true, which I hope to God its not because nobody deserves that, Trumps campaign is going to suffer as a result. If the objective was justice for being raped those years ago, then good luck. If the objective was actually just to damage Trump, then she's already won.[/QUOTE] I wouldn't be so sure, anytime something "big" about trump has come about, he's only returned fire and gone up in polls. I doubt we'll see anything major either way.
I wouldn't be surprised considering Trump throws away his wife every few years for a new 20 something year old. He's fucking gross
[QUOTE=person11;50563177]I'd vote for Obama again if it were legal. He's not been perfect, but he's better than all the current candidates and he has never been a part of any accusation or scandal.[/QUOTE] Fuck man, with the choices being Hillary or Trump, I'd even vote for Bush Jr if he ran.
Is anyone really surprised?
Innocent until proven guilty. Won't stop the crazies from slandering him/ going nuts the whole time like we've seen from mattress girl.
[video]https://youtu.be/7W9YWVQAIxM[/video]
[QUOTE=Fish Muffin;50562961]Let's not forget the hard evidence that puts Bill Clinton on Epstein's private jet multiple times. One upon which child sex parties were held.[/QUOTE] good point, but bill is not hillary.
[QUOTE=Fish Muffin;50562961]Let's not forget the hard evidence that puts Bill Clinton on Epstein's private jet multiple times. One upon which child sex parties were held.[/QUOTE] "Hard evidence" What, you mean from bottom of the barrel tabloid rags?
Imagine if both major candidates were in jail. Reminds me of the Discworld Australia where the president as arrested as soon as he's inaugurated to save time.
[QUOTE=Mingebox;50570237]Imagine if both major candidates were in jail. Reminds me of the Discworld Australia where the president as arrested as soon as he's inaugurated to save time.[/QUOTE] On the plus side you guys might end up being able to fast track voting rights for inmates/felons and put an end to felon disenfranchisement once and for all
[QUOTE=KeenanM.;50567708]Eh, you think Trump supporters are really going to waiver in support that much from this allegation? Check the above posts. You'll find loads of Trump supporters completely dismissing this as merely nothing else but smear tactics.[/QUOTE] Uhm, you don't have to be a Trump supporter to think critically Wtf
How odd .. its like every rape accusations for male celebrities get brought up when they're in the center of the media, by someone anonymous and it's something that happen years ago. Rape accusations should be anonymous for both parties. The media and people don't get the "innocent until proven guilty". And sounds very unlikely that he'll be proven guilty. Any bio-evidence is hard to find after 24 hours and gone by 72 hours. It happen 2 decades ago.
[QUOTE=Dr._Medic;50562160]Have their running mates run instead or would we be seeing Cruz vs Sanders[/QUOTE] I feel like that's honestly the best case scenario.
Isn't Trump a known misogynist and Epstein a known pedophile?
[QUOTE=MaximLaHaxim;50573862]Isn't Trump a known misogynist and Epstein a known pedophile?[/QUOTE] Misogyny is such an overused word now that it means anyone who insults or disagrees with a woman.
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;50562198]because there's a chance her rapist could become president?[/QUOTE] Honestly in similar cases I rather thing that innocent until proven guilty should certainly apply. Not to mention going off of Occam's razor, it's someone who's filing it to discredit trump for political reasons. You can bet that it's also contructed to just be on the very limit of the statute of limitations of whatever state state it's being filed in.
[QUOTE=Pops;50575222]Misogyny is such an overused word now that it means anyone who insults or disagrees with a woman.[/QUOTE] I mean... yeah that is what the term means when people insult/disagree with someone based on their gender. I know you'll probably say that PC culture labels anything as not worshiping women as misogyny though. Because a few people (and really, I mean a few. Its just that Hanity et al only make noise over the cases of overreactions) take culutral equality too far does not mean that it doesn't exist. You cannot just throw away the fact that women and minorities face massive institutional barriers to success and equality because a few idiots hate men and non white people. You don't just get to say [I]"Oh someone was over zealously using the term misogyny that means racism and sexism doesn't real!!!"[/I].
[QUOTE=Dolton;50575663]I mean... yeah that is what the term means when people insult/disagree with someone based on their gender.[/QUOTE] This is exactly what he's talking about. You don't get to just say "oh they only disagree because it's a woman".
Keep digging.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.