• ‘The Fappening 3’: More Celeb Nudes of Cara Delevingne and Others Leak Online
    157 replies, posted
[QUOTE=mikeyt493;46104154]I find it rly hard to take anyone seriously if they throw around the phrase SJW tbh[/QUOTE] What, do you take SJWs seriously?
[QUOTE=The Combine;46102968]I can't believe the SJWs are still crusading here. Don't you have anything better to do than tell a bunch of creeps that what they are doing is wrong. The world is a bad place, get over it.[/QUOTE] 'there are worse things happening in the world so don't bother me even though it's much easier and feasible to argue against creeps online than it is to solve world hunger as a single person' just because bad things happen doesn't mean we don't have a right to be angry about other bad things. Don't justify creepy behavior with 'well the world is just like this'
Well don't get me wrong there are plenty extremists who are absolutely not eg. feminists, and I do not support that at all no way but the phrase "SJW" is paraded around so much to the point where identifying as a feminist or calling some a misogynist or saying that things are about race, or gender, or sexuality etc automatically makes you a sjw. The word has no real meaning any more. Because it's used so loosely and frequently to essentially describe people who are not pieces of shit (ironically its used as an insult, which is part of what I mean- sjw has essentially come to mean "not a bigot", but as a form of insult. So if someone calls me a sjw and I think I'm being fair and balanced and legitimately defending the correct side, I assume they are a bigot themselves because HOW is supporting a good and important cause a negative? You know?) it's hard to get behind opinions of people who say it no matter which definition they adhere to, since often people use it as an excuse for hatred ("im not racist you dumbass sjw" etc) I think simply words like extremist, racist, bigot, etc etc are better words to use since they have legitimate meaning and weight to them and haven't been soiled by, well, bigots to mean anyone who meets the criteria of being a decent human being.
[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;46101815]this is literally one of the most confusing posts i've seen in fp in a few years confusing because i don't know if it's funny or sad - have you ever even seen a real world (anime and porn doesn't count! sorry!) woman naked? if you think jlaw's tits aren't even that nice you're screwed mate[/QUOTE] Ugh, this shit again, I mean... I'm jaded, man. I mean... I'm depressed. You people, man. It's like you don't even have a keyboard in front of you, it's like you have a selection screen for generic replies.
good constructive well thought out rebuttal friend [editline]29th September 2014[/editline] i think you just made the most vapid post in this thread so far good job
[QUOTE=EmperorKabuto;46098787]man I bet the internet would be more outraged by this if the privacy being invaded was theirs and their nudes were leaked. The only problem is the spergy gross assholes who would actually jerk off to private photos that they don't have consent to access wouldn't post nudes to begin with since that would imply someone actually wanted them in the first place.[/QUOTE] I will make sure to ask consent before I look at pictures online now, I am sorry to all the women I have mentally raped in the past years, it must be jarring.
[QUOTE=duckmaster;46104869]I will make sure to ask consent before I look at pictures online now, I am sorry to all the women I have mentally raped in the past years, it must be jarring.[/QUOTE] oh fuck off, I didn't suggest anything about mental rape. Nobody calls theft 'property rape' so don't be a fucking knobgoblin about it. Accessing photos without consent is theft.
[QUOTE=proboardslol;46104227]What, do you take SJWs seriously?[/QUOTE] If having some sense of decency makes someone a SJW warrior now, I'd rather be considered a SJW than having to be apologetic for sounding like one, fuck the idiots that have no fucking idea what they are talking about.
i love how you creeps instantly blurt out some extreme, hyperbolic shit like implying a written contract is required to look at pics or some goofy junk like that whenever you get called out. look pal, if you want to beat it to celebrity nudes, that's your business, nobody cares. but don't come here flaunting it like it's totally peachy and encouraging the creeps who pull this shit without expecting to be called a gross manchild, because if you think there's nothing wrong in being complicit with the massive violation of people's intimacy, that's exactly what you are. fuckin' incredible that a forum that so vehemently opposes internet surveillance and government invasion of privacy lacks the mental faculties to understand why this whole thing is wrong & disgusting.
Sometimes, I feel like FP should be only about games and games accessories. Just games, nothing else. No creepos, no anything else that isn't games... :c
[QUOTE=EmperorKabuto;46104334]'there are worse things happening in the world so don't bother me even though it's much easier and feasible to argue against creeps online than it is to solve world hunger as a single person' just because bad things happen doesn't mean we don't have a right to be angry about other bad things. Don't justify creepy behavior with 'well the world is just like this'[/QUOTE] I'm not justifying shit. I didn't even choose a side. I was asking you guys what you get out of it, if its really worth your time fighting for internet justice. You aren't helping anyone, what do you think the 8000 guests were doing here? Following your lame ass discussion? I couldn't care less about the third iteration of The Fappening, what I am interested in is your personal reason to come here and tell people how miserable they are for doing this. I'm not joining this shitty discussion, I am asking a quesion.
If people are allowed to come in here and post about how they jerk it to private photos of women and then proceed to judge and condemn them then I am allowed to come in here and call them out for being fucking trash lmao
where are the pics then this is bullshit [editline]29th September 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;46104767] the guy on the reddit had said basically the same thing you said (that her tits were shit and that small boobs are better)[/QUOTE] wow amazing
[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;46104767]I will quote what this Detona guy said on reddit when this came up because I'm too lazy to type it all by myself [editline]29th September 2014[/editline] come to think about it are you just messing with us the guy on the reddit had said basically the same thing you said (that her tits were shit and that small boobs are better)[/QUOTE] Now in this regard I disagree with the man on reddit; first of all I must declare that I have a bias towards small tits, and Asian ones at that, so I cannot be expected to give a neutral opinion on large, white girl tits. That said, I do not think JLaw's tits have an exceptionally good shape for their size. In some pictures, they appear to be compressed when lying down, stick straight out when standing straight, and (this is my bias), her skin complexion (freckles, and all that) is not appealing to me. When we consider the delicate matter of tittage (known as boobage to those of you on the metric system), it is important not just to consider their structural qualities, but their overall package as well. I think the difference between my imperial tit and your metric boob is clouding the debate, seeing as I personally was raised in a family that believes that other factors, such as areola diameter, nipple size/length (note: by nipple I mean just the end, and NOT the entire areola) and skin pigmentation/complexion. In this regard, those in Europe have a handicap against their perception of tittage (boobage) in that they are unable to consider other factors of the woman, such as body hair/odor, as well. However, I propose that both British Imperial and French Metric systems are, in fact, outdated compared to the more modern system the japanese have developed under the JPO ([b]J[/b]a[b]p[/b]anese [b]O[/b]ppai). The JPO is not a definite black-white sliding scale, but takes into account multiple dimensions, regarding the situational needs of the JPO (such as sexual preference of the recipient of the tittage (boobage) as well as different levels of standards based on skin pigmentation. Okinawan's, for example, have lower incidences of poor skin complexion, as darker skin allows skin blemishes such as birth marks or moles to blend in more easily. On the other side, girls in Tokyo have a handicap on their skin complexion JPO because lighter skin is more revealing of skin defects, allowing more leniency in their JPO rating. Now unfortunately this does not translate well to white audiences; Asian breasts, real or fake, are generally better than white ones (as well as Asian proportions in general). Thus, the massive handicap that must be placed on whites (known to the Japanese as "hamu-beasteru") sullies to accuracy of our data on the JPO scale. Thus we must conclude that large, white, hamu-beasteru Oppais are, in fact, irredeemable in the eyes of pure science. Therefore, it must be concluded that JLaw's tits are scientifically, verifiably, wonky a f.
their tit quality isnt fucking important jesus christ i cant believe you just wrote a goddamn essay on JLaw's tits
[QUOTE=mikeyt493;46106568]their tit quality isnt fucking important jesus christ i cant believe you just wrote a goddamn essay on JLaw's tits[/QUOTE] Theoretical science may not have practical implications in the now, but its unforseen implications in the future could be boundless! For example, when researchers at AT&T were attempting to create a solid state signal booster for phone lines to replace the vaccuum tube, they researched solid state physics heavily. In this process, they invented the first solar cell, offering a new, renewable energy source. Thus, you can see your fallacious opinion is hindering the progress of mankind. While today, we are simply talking about JLaws tittage (boobage), tomorrow we could be examining the tittage of an alien species! Or a genetically engineered human with three tits! or one! at that point, we must re-evaluate our scale, and see whether or not we can compensate appropriately for the Oppai of this new, unexplored species. For the good of mankind. God bless America
you just fucking wrote an essay about breast science what the fuck lmao
[QUOTE=The Combine;46102968]I can't believe the SJWs are still crusading here. Don't you have anything better to do than tell a bunch of creeps that what they are doing is wrong. The world is a bad place, get over it.[/QUOTE] And some people want it to be better, get over it.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46106603]you just fucking wrote an essay about breast science what the fuck lmao[/QUOTE] Someone give this guy a medal
[QUOTE=proboardslol;46106595]Theoretical science may not have practical implications in the now, but its unforseen implications in the future could be boundless! For example, when researchers at AT&T were attempting to create a solid state signal booster for phone lines to replace the vaccuum tube, they researched solid state physics heavily. In this process, they invented the first solar cell, offering a new, renewable energy source. Thus, you can see your fallacious opinion is hindering the progress of mankind. While today, we are simply talking about JLaws tittage (boobage), tomorrow we could be examining the tittage of an alien species! Or a genetically engineered human with three tits! or one! at that point, we must re-evaluate our scale, and see whether or not we can compensate appropriately for the Oppai of this new, unexplored species. For the good of mankind. God bless America[/QUOTE] please stop now
[QUOTE=proboardslol;46106541]Now in this regard I disagree with the man on reddit; first of all I must declare that I have a bias towards small tits, and Asian ones at that, so I cannot be expected to give a neutral opinion on large, white girl tits. That said, I do not think JLaw's tits have an exceptionally good shape for their size. In some pictures, they appear to be compressed when lying down, stick straight out when standing straight, and (this is my bias), her skin complexion (freckles, and all that) is not appealing to me. When we consider the delicate matter of tittage (known as boobage to those of you on the metric system), it is important not just to consider their structural qualities, but their overall package as well. I think the difference between my imperial tit and your metric boob is clouding the debate, seeing as I personally was raised in a family that believes that other factors, such as areola diameter, nipple size/length (note: by nipple I mean just the end, and NOT the entire areola) and skin pigmentation/complexion. In this regard, those in Europe have a handicap against their perception of tittage (boobage) in that they are unable to consider other factors of the woman, such as body hair/odor, as well. However, I propose that both British Imperial and French Metric systems are, in fact, outdated compared to the more modern system the japanese have developed under the JPO ([b]J[/b]a[b]p[/b]anese [b]O[/b]ppai). The JPO is not a definite black-white sliding scale, but takes into account multiple dimensions, regarding the situational needs of the JPO (such as sexual preference of the recipient of the tittage (boobage) as well as different levels of standards based on skin pigmentation. Okinawan's, for example, have lower incidences of poor skin complexion, as darker skin allows skin blemishes such as birth marks or moles to blend in more easily. On the other side, girls in Tokyo have a handicap on their skin complexion JPO because lighter skin is more revealing of skin defects, allowing more leniency in their JPO rating. Now unfortunately this does not translate well to white audiences; Asian breasts, real or fake, are generally better than white ones (as well as Asian proportions in general). Thus, the massive handicap that must be placed on whites (known to the Japanese as "hamu-beasteru") sullies to accuracy of our data on the JPO scale. Thus we must conclude that large, white, hamu-beasteru Oppais are, in fact, irredeemable in the eyes of pure science. Therefore, it must be concluded that JLaw's tits are scientifically, verifiably, wonky a f.[/QUOTE] you are fucked in the head
how am I not surprised he said some shit about Japanese boob scaling, I bet he watched some weird porn anime about it now he's obsessed
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46106672]how am I not surprise he said some shit about Japanese boob scaling, I bet he watched some weird porn anime about it now he's obsessed[/QUOTE] Dammit, Jim, did you even read! I'm a scientist, not a literary critic! It's up to you to pay attention! Boob scaling MIGHT fall into the "sexual preference" category, but the scale I talk about is a purely abstract scale that measure the JPO of said tits. This is the exact kind of backlash Neil Armstrong and Buzz Lightyear got when they invented the moon, or the kind Jesus got when he invented God! Naysayers holding back the progress of mankind just so they can be content at home with their "mybooks" and their "facey-spaces"
omg [QUOTE=mikeyt493;46099669]That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying it can certainly affect your perception of women (or anyone- there are negative stereotypes perpetuate all throughout porn, from about men, people of colour, even places of employment) especially if you have little interaction with them already.[/QUOTE] [I]it all comes full circle[/I] [editline]29th September 2014[/editline] dude what's your fucking problem you say you have an Asian girlfriend does she live in the fucking anime world lmao
[QUOTE=proboardslol;46106720]Dammit, Jim, did you even read! I'm a scientist, not a literary critic! It's up to you to pay attention! Boob scaling MIGHT fall into the "sexual preference" category, but the scale I talk about is a purely abstract scale that measure the JPO of said tits. This is the exact kind of backlash Neil Armstrong and Buzz Lightyear got when they invented the moon, or the kind Jesus got when he invented God! Naysayers holding back the progress of mankind just so they can be content at home with their "mybooks" and their "facey-spaces"[/QUOTE] uh what
Well this thread just took an interesting turn.
[QUOTE=mikeyt493;46106733]omg [I]it all comes full circle[/I] [editline]29th September 2014[/editline] dude what's your fucking problem you say you have an Asian girlfriend does she live in the fucking anime world lmao[/QUOTE] right on the money, oh the poor soul he is
[QUOTE=mikeyt493;46106733]omg [I]it all comes full circle[/I] [editline]29th September 2014[/editline] dude what's your fucking problem you say you have an Asian girlfriend does she live in the fucking anime world lmao[/QUOTE] Now this is racism at its purest. My girlfriend is [i]thai[/i]. Not every asian girl looks like your japanese anime waifu, you depraved, degenerate weeaboo neckbeard! I'll have you know she's studying Biology at her College and is a very respectable lady! Don't assume all asian girls are japanese, you [b]vicious racist[/b]
[QUOTE=proboardslol;46106766]Now this is racism at its purest. My girlfriend is [i]thai[/i]. Not every asian girl looks like your japanese anime waifu, you depraved, degenerate weeaboo neckbeard! I'll have you know she's studying Biology at her College and is a very respectable lady! Don't assume all asian girls are japanese, you [b]vicious racist[/b][/QUOTE] Is she real though
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46106772]Is she real though[/QUOTE] Yes, thailand is a real country. I'm often asked that from other ignorant people who assume it's the same thing as taiwan. She is [i]thai[/i], not [i]taiwanese[/i]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.