• Palin For President In 2012?
    199 replies, posted
She's a bigot and an Islamaphobe. I'm not religious, so the religious implications don't really phase me. And the quran doesn't "encourage violence against non-Muslims" The surah that most people cite is actually in defence of bigotry and oppression. The articles of confederation negated the constitution. Federal law is still supreme law. [editline]08:02PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23741563]No, it just wasn't working up to the expectations of who wrote it. It "didn't end in disaster". And are you just going to keep on ignoring the 10th Amendment?[/QUOTE] The 10th amendment is pretty irrelevant. FEDERAL LAW, is still supreme law for fucks sake, this is basic history. [editline]08:02PM[/editline] not to expectations? it was a colossal cluster fuck
We're gonna begin a Revolution if she gets to become a president.
[QUOTE=Warhol;23741908] The 10th amendment is pretty irrelevant. FEDERAL LAW, is still supreme law [/QUOTE] That's an oxymoron. The 10th Amendment is PART OF FEDERAL LAW. And so, its just as important and relevant as the rest of the constitution. Its modern day politicians that choose to pick what parts they want to follow and others to ignore. Which happens with in both of the two major parties.
[QUOTE=CabooseRvB;23741949]We're gonna begin a Revolution if she gets to become a president.[/QUOTE] What, are you going to join up with your 4chan buddies and send some pizzas to the white house? Viva La Revolución
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23741970]That's an oxymoron. The 10th Amendment is PART OF FEDERAL LAW. And so, its just as important and relevant as the rest of the constitution. Its modern day politicians that choose to pick what parts they want to follow and others to ignore. Which happens with in both of the two major parties.[/QUOTE] It's federal law granting state rights, hence why it's HURP through state law
[QUOTE=Warhol;23742169]It's federal law granting state rights, hence why it's HURP through state law[/QUOTE] Oh my oh my, the FEDERAL government giving AWAY POWER, what shall we ever do? This is truly an act of evil beyond even the grasp of Satan himself.
2012: Palin becomes the president of the United States 2013: USA becomes Christian States of America God, even a tomato could run that country better than Palin. Good thing she'll probably get a few thousand votes from fundamentalist christian republicans, and that's it.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23742198]Oh my oh my, the FEDERAL government giving AWAY POWER, what shall we ever do? This is truly an act of evil beyond even the grasp of Satan himself.[/QUOTE] ok, just do that, don't argue a point or anything.
[QUOTE=Warhol;23742562]ok, just do that, don't argue a point or anything.[/QUOTE] Our argument has fallen into you saying more federal power is good and myself saying that less federal power is good. Neither of us are going to move on our opinions. So why bother?
If she gets elected, then the whole "World would end in 2012" bullshit may be true.
No. Just no.
What about Mike Huckabee and others? Who are the other prominent republican candidates for 2012 presidency?
[QUOTE=ohadje;23742801]What about Mike Huckabee and others? Who are the other prominent republican candidates for 2012 presidency?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=The Article] In an interview for Newsmax, the former Speaker of the House was asked who he expects to oppose President Obama in 2012. Gingrich responded by rattling off a list of Republicans expected to run: former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, Miss. Gov. Haley Barbour, Minn. Gov. Tim Pawlenty, South Dakota Sen. John Thune, Rep. Ron Paul (Texas) and yes, Sarah Palin.[/QUOTE] There
[QUOTE=ohadje;23742801]What about Mike Huckabee and others? Who are the other prominent republican candidates for 2012 presidency?[/QUOTE] He's worse than Palin imo
My history teacher says that Obama's not going to run in 2012; that he will, however run in several terms or so and win then.
If they bring back McCain 1.0 (the moderate one from years' past) they'll have a chance at winning. All of their other big name candidates are too insane to win over the majority.
[QUOTE=Muffinbuster;23743003]My history teacher says that Obama's not going to run in 2012; that he will, however run in several terms or so and win then.[/QUOTE] Your history teacher teaches the past, not the future :v:
[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;23742970]He's worse than Palin imo[/QUOTE] why
[QUOTE=Fast Threads;23735138]No[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=JDK721;23743090]why[/QUOTE] She's at least a moron and her politics follow from that [editline]04:19PM[/editline] Although how bright could Huckabee be really
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OSanK1WeYs[/media]
:byodood: Palin?
[QUOTE=Leaf Runner;23735517]You just know there are gonna be people out there who vote for Palin as a joke.[/QUOTE] If someone votes for someone as a joke they don't deserve to vote.
[QUOTE=Rautatie;23742427]2012: Palin becomes the president of the United States [b]2013: USA becomes Christian States of America[/b] God, even a tomato could run that country better than Palin. Good thing she'll probably get a few thousand votes from fundamentalist christian republicans, and that's it.[/QUOTE] That would be nice IMO. [editline]09:52PM[/editline] [QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;23744669]If someone votes for someone as a joke they don't deserve to vote.[/QUOTE] Maybe they'd vote for Palin because they agree with her. There are a lot of republicans that are better than her, but I'd still vote for her over Obama.
[QUOTE=ZF911;23744898] Maybe they'd vote for Palin because they agree with her. There are a lot of republicans that are better than her, but I'd still vote for her over Obama.[/QUOTE] If they vote for someone because they agree with her there's no problem. But voting for someone as a joke is a disgrace.
[QUOTE=ZF911;23744898]That would be nice IMO. [/QUOTE] Hit the decks, incoming shit storm!
[QUOTE=ZF911;23744898]That would be nice IMO.[/QUOTE] Hooray for spurring religious hate nationwide!
Fuck that.
[QUOTE=ZF911;23744898]That would be nice IMO. Maybe they'd vote for Palin because they agree with her. There are a lot of republicans that are better than her, but I'd still vote for her over Obama.[/QUOTE] you best be trolling son
[QUOTE=JDK721;23745733]you best be trolling son[/QUOTE] I'm not trolling.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.