[QUOTE=ZF911;23750758]Yeah but there are things usually only Christians support, such as being pro-life.
[editline]03:39AM[/editline]
Yes they do.[/QUOTE]
being "pro-life" is a slap to the face of woman's rights
Not really, it's usually subjective and change all the time. ethics are better.
[editline]08:21PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23750422]You honestly believe there will be "christian amendments" made to the constitution? You underestimate the secularity of America.
[editline]10:17PM[/editline]
Define "Christian dominance"[/QUOTE]
A spike in Christian influence. It was also during Carter as well.
[editline]08:22PM[/editline]
I'm not even going to respond to the other point, because you don't even know what you're arguing.
[editline]08:24PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=ZF911;23750525]By Christian nation, I don't mean taking away any freedoms or rights that we have. No forcing anyone to do anything. I'm not saying making other religions illegal or looked down upon. I'm just saying it'd be nice to have a president who will, and will assign people who will think more about morals and values and such.[/QUOTE]
You can have morals and values without Religion
And not only that, some of those "morals" will actually take away freedoms and rights.
Remember the LAST time we had morals and values in such high dominance in the white house?
Bush/Reagan
ended in disaster.
[editline]08:26PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=ZF911;23750797]Yep. Why does FacePunch hate Republicans, and if you voice an opinion besides pro-liberal you get flamed out?
[editline]03:41AM[/editline]
Aka anti-murder, so yes.[/QUOTE]
Because Republicans have basically the largest prevailer of death and destruction in the United States and many other countries.
isn't murder if the fetus isn't fully human yet.
Glad to see Ron Paul would be taking another shot at it.
i've said it before, but:
hopefully ron paul (or his son) will run as an independent or libertarian in 2012
that way the vote is split on the conservative side and obama gets reelected
[QUOTE=siberpredaht;23763274]i've said it before, but:
hopefully ron paul (or his son) will run as an independent or libertarian in 2012
that way the vote is split on the conservative side and obama gets reelected[/QUOTE]
Is libertarian economy really what the US needs right now?
[QUOTE=ohadje;23763669]Is libertarian economy really what the US needs right now?[/QUOTE]
how about you read the post you dumbshit
snipp
No need to flame though.
[QUOTE=ohadje;23763861]snipp[/QUOTE]
yes, but you seem to skip the part of:
"splitting the vote"
and
"obama getting reelected"
[editline]08:03PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=ohadje;23763861]snipp
No need to flame though.[/QUOTE]
okay , i'm sorry honey bunny i take back what i said
[QUOTE=JDK721;23735627]only the republicans/conservatives (they don't have a functioning brain) like her
[B]anyone with a lick of intelligence[/B] would never vote for her[/QUOTE]
Well, there goes America.
James cameron 2012 omg
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31g0YE61PLQ[/media]
If that happens, me and my family are packing up and going to europe. Granted, that might happen anyway. But I want an ocean between me and the us if that happens. Granted, at the current rate, I'd want that anyway. And I live in canada.
[quote]James cameron 2012 omg [/quote]
Better than the alternatives.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23751211]No, actually he doesn't [I]have[/I] to leave Afghanistan in any way.
Only immediate withdraw will end the deaths of American soldiers. Staying to "help build" will only result in McCain's "100 year war" there that he wanted so badly.[/QUOTE]
Imagine their reputation when they're the country that goes in, fucks up and leaves everything in ruins when they're done. It's not for fun their soldiers are there "rebuilding" now. it's to save some face. and it's a damn good idea because the rest of the world are starting to look funny at them.
People tend to ignore the part where they did it to save a shitton of asses.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;23768066]Imagine their reputation when they're the country that goes in, fucks up and leaves everything in ruins when they're done. It's not for fun their soldiers are there "rebuilding" now. it's to save some face. and it's a damn good idea because the rest of the world are starting to look funny at them.
People tend to ignore the part where they did it to save a shitton of asses.[/QUOTE]
America hasn't cared about its public image before in invading defenseless countries, why should we care now?
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23768312]America hasn't cared about its public image before in invading defenseless countries, why should we care now?[/QUOTE]
This is terrible thinking.
Thats it
I'm leaving America. I'm going to Japan, at least they're whacky shit is fucking hilarious not facepalmingly stupid!
Truth is, none of the current candidates are good, all they do is kiss ass and act slightly christian. Hell, if you shoot one, there's gonna be one to replace him instantly, and absolutley nothing will change.
Zeke for prez 2012
:suicide:
[QUOTE=Billiam;23769519]Zeke for prez 2012[/QUOTE]
hes canadian so he's mine!
zeke 4 prime minister (whatever year harper calls an election)!
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;23768312]America hasn't cared about its public image before in invading defenseless countries, why should we care now?[/QUOTE]
This is not at all a good thing
we don't need no stinkin' alaskan rednecks
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
