• Russian security forces arrest 34 during Moscow gay pride protest
    172 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Kopimi;30172814]Saying that the naked participants discredit the seriousness of the parade is a lot different from saying that they actively decrease support for gay rights.[/QUOTE] If they don't actually decrease support for their rights, then what is the issue with them being naked? What other implication could you have possibly made with that statement?
but if they're not decreasing the support for gay rights then what's the problem? unless it's important for parades to be "serious" in the same way that it's important for video games to be "realistic" [editline]31st May 2011[/editline] oh jinxpost
The issue would be that your message would affect less people, that the ridiculousness might turn away some people who are on the fence over the matter. [editline]1st June 2011[/editline] This has literally been the point I've been trying to get across the entire time :sigh:
[QUOTE=Kopimi;30172905]The issue would be that your message would affect less people[/quote] This is what I'm talking about when I say you're implying a detraction or decrease in gay rights support. [QUOTE=Kopimi;30172905]that the ridiculousness might turn away some people who are on the fence over the matter.[/QUOTE] There really aren't too many (Read: None) people who are going to be convinced not to support gay rights because some of the activists show up naked.
[QUOTE=Kopimi;30172905]The issue would be that your message would affect less people, that the ridiculousness might turn away some people who are on the fence over the matter. [/QUOTE] it's not really that much of a loss if somebody decides to side with homophobes because they saw a naked guy once at a gay pride parade
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;30172938]This is what I'm talking about when I say you're implying a detraction or decrease in gay rights support. [b]There really aren't too many (Read: None) people who are going to be convinced not to support gay rights because some of the activists show up naked.[/b][/QUOTE] I disagree. There are plenty of people who are on the fence about the situation, not everyone is strictly for or against.
but anyone who is "on the fence" (ie someone who is applying even the tiniest bit of critical thought to their own cognitive processes) isn't going to be swayed one way or the other by a naked man
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;30172726]What Sigma's saying is that there aren't people swayed by gay pride parades to not want them to have marriage rights. People aren't turned away from supporting gay rights because some guys go on a parade naked, and Kopimi seems to think that's actively decreasing support for gay rights.[/QUOTE] makes sense, if thats the kind of image the group is going to get out, thats the kind of response theyre going to get back [editline]1st June 2011[/editline] they should look at ian mckellen that guy knows how to show maturity [editline]1st June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Sanius;30172961]it's not really that much of a loss if somebody decides to side with homophobes because they saw a naked guy once at a gay pride parade[/QUOTE] so you're basically saying that a group's image has nothing to do with how successful it will be
Okay, about the issue of the parade-goers flaking around looking like silly nude clowns: I guess it is to attract awareness, that they are there, I mean yes, they look totally ridiculous, but I am aware that LGBT people already exist, I sorta don't see the actual need for it since it has been an issue for decades, yet it shouldn't be since they are as human as we are. Making the whole point moot. They can now drop the weird and get serious. :colbert: From a sociological standpoint tho, I guess the whole 'costumes' thing (or lack thereof) gets backed by tradition. They aren't actually looking like that all dae-long, but it's sorta like what they endured.
[QUOTE=Mon;30173629] so you're basically saying that a group's image has nothing to do with how successful it will be[/QUOTE] a "group's" image? what group? a couple of naked dudes in a parade? do you really think that represents homosexuals as a whole?
[QUOTE=Sanius;30171395]hmm I wonder which of the two can marry by the way, good job putting mentally retarded people and homosexuals on the same level. that's extremely offensive[/QUOTE] They are on the same level. Both groups are humans. Therefore equal. You are doing the exact same thing that the people you call bigots do. Some people don't think gays are equal to straights. Same principal, 2 groups of the same species with different attributes being separated because of the minor differences. Good to see people as a society moving forward, at least we aren't dividing by color anymore.. Also quit getting your panties in a bunch. Stop getting offended so easy or thinking everything is offensive. Bunch of goddamn pussies. This world is turning into a big gaping cunt.
[QUOTE=Sanius;30179865]a "group's" image? what group? a couple of naked dudes in a parade? do you really think that represents homosexuals as a whole?[/QUOTE] that's the kind of image its giving them so sure why not
[QUOTE=Tacosheller;30133375]I think pride parades are stupid and if you really feel the need to "come out" about your sexuality you're just an attention whore If you're gay, cool, no need to fucking tell your entire goddamn family and ruin a good christmas Just go out and fuck dudes and if they ask tell the truth I mean you're allowed to feel however you want about your sexuality but the closest straight people have to a pride parade is mardi gras [editline]30th May 2011[/editline] And you guys do realize this was all permit violation? The pride parade didn't even attemp to get a permit. The neo nazis did. The end.[/QUOTE] Or... maybe they parade about their sexuality because homosexuals are treated unfairly and they no longer want to take it.
[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;30188608]They are on the same level. Both groups are humans. Therefore equal. You are doing the exact same thing that the people you call bigots do. Some people don't think gays are equal to straights. Same principal, 2 groups of the same species with different attributes being separated because of the minor differences. Good to see people as a society moving forward, at least we aren't dividing by color anymore.. Also quit getting your panties in a bunch. Stop getting offended so easy or thinking everything is offensive. Bunch of goddamn pussies. This world is turning into a big gaping cunt.[/QUOTE] You don't see how calling homosexuals mentally deficient is offensive? He said nothing about people with mental handicaps being lesser, just that drawing the comparison is inaccurate and a tool that bigots constantly use to try to marginalize homosexuality. Get your head out of your ass.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30191182]You don't see how calling homosexuals mentally deficient is offensive? He said nothing about people with mental handicaps being lesser, just that drawing the comparison is inaccurate and a tool that bigots constantly use to try to marginalize homosexuality. Get your head out of your ass.[/QUOTE] you really like that word bigot [editline]1st June 2011[/editline] going to be honest zeke it kind of describes you
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30191182]You don't see how calling homosexuals mentally deficient is offensive? He said nothing about people with mental handicaps being lesser, just that drawing the comparison is inaccurate and a tool that bigots constantly use to try to marginalize homosexuality. Get your head out of your ass.[/QUOTE] I do but I don't care because I am not offended by it. I don't feel that way about them. I was saying that if you call your friend or someone a homo with no negative connotation its not wrong to say. But those that do say its bad no matter what like to call things others say retarded, in doing so they are going against exactly what they are saying just to a different group of people.
[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;30191490]I do but I don't care because I am not offended by it. I don't feel that way about them. I was saying that if you call your friend or someone a homo with no negative connotation its not wrong to say. But those that do say its bad no matter what like to call things others say retarded, in doing so they are going against exactly what they are saying just to a different group of people.[/QUOTE] I'm going to assume you're straight, and that's why you aren't offended by it. Correct me if I'm wrong, of course. But if I'm right then you really aren't in any position to tell gay people what they should and shouldn't be offended by just as I'm not in a position to tell black people that "nigger" isn't offensive because I'm white.
[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;30191490] But those that do say its bad no matter what like to call things others say retarded...[/QUOTE] uhh how is this quantifiable?
If I call my friend a limp wristed ass wrangler and we are both straight how is it offensive?
[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;30191850][QUOTE=Zeke129;30191643]I'm going to assume you're straight, and that's why you aren't offended by it. Correct me if I'm wrong, of course. But if I'm right then you really aren't in any position to tell gay people what they should and shouldn't be offended by just as I'm not in a position to tell black people that "nigger" isn't offensive because I'm white.[/QUOTE] [/QUOTE] I don't know what you're doing here You seem to have forgot your post
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30191872]I don't know what you're doing here You seem to have forgot your post[/QUOTE] iphone fail refresh page.
[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;30191850]If I call my friend a limp wristed ass wrangler and we are both straight how is it offensive?[/QUOTE] if i tell a racist joke and there aren't any black people in the room, is it no longer racist? [editline]1st June 2011[/editline] racism/homophobia are sentiments, not actions [editline]1st June 2011[/editline] telling racist jokes/using homophobic slurs shows the internalization of those sentiments [editline]1st June 2011[/editline] even if the speaker isn't a racist or a homophobe
[QUOTE=Sgt.Sgt;30191850]If I call my friend a limp wristed ass wrangler and we are both straight how is it offensive?[/QUOTE] Why do you even have to ask this? Besides, it's hardly just something you say in private since you posted it on an internationally accessed internet forum.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.