• Vanity Fair criticizes Trump Grill, future President Trump lashes out
    41 replies, posted
[QUOTE=BF;51540966]Trump's response was very unpresidential, but to be fair, that review of his restaurant also seems absolutely unprofessional. It's one-sided political commentary masquerading as a restaurant review. Pathetic.[/QUOTE] Nobody cares about the quality of Vanity Fair though, it's not going to run our country. An impulsive easily offended man child is though.
ahhhh another trump bashing thread [highlight](User was banned for this post ("why reply" - postal))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Xmeagol;51542797]ahhhh another trump bashing thread[/QUOTE] Maybe he should stop saying and doing stupid shit every hour and then maybe we wouldn't have to criticize him. It's not "bashing" if he's the one acting like a child and tweeting insults to magazine companies, just because they didn't like his restaurant. Perhaps he should get off Twitter, because he's just embarrassing the country at this point.
[QUOTE]she wrote, was a short-rib burger "[B]molded into a sad little meat thing, sitting in the center of a massive, rapidly staling brioche bun, hiding its shame under a slice of melted orange cheese. It came with overcooked woody batons called 'fries'—how can someone mess up fries?—and ketchup masquerading as Heinz. If the cheeseburger is a quintessential part of America's identity, Trump's pledge to 'make America great again' suddenly appeared not very promising."[/B][/QUOTE] to be fair, her critique (if you can call it that) was just asking for it
[QUOTE=sYnced;51543190]to be fair, her critique (if you can call it that) was just asking for it[/QUOTE] No not to be fair, hes going to be the fucking president of the united states stop fucking lowering the bar for him.
It's not a "bash trump" thread, it's a "hold him to the same standard as every other president" thread.
[QUOTE=sYnced;51543190]to be fair, her critique (if you can call it that) was just asking for it[/QUOTE] Didn't Fox news run a story for a full week about how obama was some kind of heretic for having mustard in a cheeseburger?. If I recall correctly, wasn't there some big racist conspiracy theory about how ~obongo is fucking black so that means he's from kenya or something, the fucking muslim~? a "movement" that Trump was actually a pretty big part of, and that, even now is still lingering about like some resilient, vengeful shitstink in a portable toilet. And yet somehow he managed not to make tweets crying about it. Obama's entire presidency was absolutely full of people making deeply offensive statements, remarks, and rumours about him and his family. If Obama could take all of that in his stride, just laughing it off when forced to acknowledge the slander, Trump can deal with someone saying his products are shit without trying to start flame wars on twitter like a 14 year old girl.
[QUOTE=fulgrim;51543403]Didn't Fox news run a story for a full week about how obama was some kind of heretic for having mustard in a cheeseburger?. If I recall correctly, wasn't there some big racist conspiracy theory about how ~obongo is fucking black so that means he's from kenya or something, the fucking muslim~? a "movement" that Trump was actually a pretty big part of, and that, even now is still lingering about like some resilient, vengeful shitstink in a portable toilet. And yet somehow he managed not to make tweets crying about it. Obama's entire presidency was absolutely full of people making deeply offensive statements, remarks, and rumours about him and his family. If Obama could take all of that in his stride, just laughing it off when forced to acknowledge the slander, Trump can deal with someone saying his products are shit without trying to start flame wars on twitter like a 14 year old girl.[/QUOTE] I don't think that there's a single person in this thread who is defending the substance of Trump's response. No one. I'm not; it was very unpresidential. But that doesn't excuse the restaurant 'review' in the first place. Why can't I criticise that pathetic piece of journalism, because that is what it was, without my comment being seen as defending Trump? Why does it always have to be 'us versus them'? Is it somehow okay for the media to drop their standards of journalistic integrity, as long as Trump responds with a hissy fit on Twitter?
[QUOTE=S31-Syntax;51538433]Read that as flirting. Wouldn't that be awkward.[/QUOTE] i mean he probably already has been so it's not like it'd change anything
[QUOTE=BF;51545279]I don't think that there's a single person in this thread who is defending the substance of Trump's response. No one. I'm not; it was very unpresidential. But that doesn't excuse the restaurant 'review' in the first place. Why can't I criticise that pathetic piece of journalism, because that is what it was, without my comment being seen as defending Trump? Why does it always have to be 'us versus them'? Is it somehow okay for the media to drop their standards of journalistic integrity, as long as Trump responds with a hissy fit on Twitter?[/QUOTE] I mean, you [i]can[/i]. Go right ahead. But I care more about the behavior of our fucking future president than some random ass shitstain writing for Vanity Fair or whatever. God damn I can barely think of a single more despicable individual out there, save for maybe Martin Shkreli lmao. How the fuck did people vote for this pinheaded waste of oxygen.
[QUOTE=BF;51545279]I don't think that there's a single person in this thread who is defending the substance of Trump's response. No one. I'm not; it was very unpresidential. But that doesn't excuse the restaurant 'review' in the first place. Why can't I criticise that pathetic piece of journalism, because that is what it was, without my comment being seen as defending Trump? Why does it always have to be 'us versus them'? Is it somehow okay for the media to drop their standards of journalistic integrity, as long as Trump responds with a hissy fit on Twitter?[/QUOTE] My point is that it doesn't matter how shit the journalism was, Obama faced far more farcical attacks from "journalists" and tv shows without throwing a hissy fit on twitter. There will always be hack writers and eyeroll inducing articles, it's not a new thing. What [i] is [/i] new is the fact that a man who is about to become the president of the united states has such a thin skin that he looks set to cry about every single one he notices. "The media" barely has any standards to drop, this is common knowledge, the president of the united states [i] does [/i].
[QUOTE=Dolton;51543314]No not to be fair, hes going to be the fucking president of the united states stop fucking lowering the bar for him.[/QUOTE] to be fair, he's not even the chef lets stay objective here (you're worked up) chill out
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.