More teens smoke pot than cigarettes, says CDC survey - Polidicks

[QUOTE=ghosevil;36308579]BigOwl you are wrong. You never had any citations in the first place, you have just been farting out false statements from the start.[/QUOTE] Another person who hasn't read the thread! :v: [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url]

[QUOTE=BigOwl;36308684]Another person who hasn't read the thread! :v: [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url] [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?...1#post36268574[/url][/QUOTE] No Thread specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator [editline]13th June 2012[/editline] are you high

[QUOTE=Ordigenius;36308761]No Thread specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator [editline]13th June 2012[/editline] are you high[/QUOTE] Ah shit, why didn't those copy correctly? just hit the link I posted a few posts up. Or don't and tell me I'm not citing my sources again. That always works.

[QUOTE=BigOwl;36304963]I already posted them a few pages back. [url]http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1189530&p=36268574&viewfull=1#post36268574[/url] Read the thread for real this time, and try once more. I'm not telling you to go find them yourself, very tact paraphrasing there though, I'm simply suggesting you read the thread before attempting to debate. Bottom line is you didn't read the thread, because if you had, you would have seen the sources. I posted them again just fine, but I can see laziness is just one of your many strong suits. Regardless of how many chemicals are in cigarettes. they're still very fucking bad for you, I don't care if you smoke them, just that you don't live in denial. Thread is over.[/QUOTE] Okay, great. You have some links. However, neither of those are [b]credible[/b]. If you reread [b]my[/b] post, you will see that I said "I've yet to see a single [b]credible[/b] source" The first link is from [b]a cigarette manufacturer[/b], one who has [b]no legal obligation to reveal everything in their products[/b]. Without such legal obligation, what makes you really think they would post all the carcinogens and toxins that may or may not be present in their product? And the second link... I mean, come on, man. Honestly? [url][b]quitsmoking[/b].about.com[/url]? Do you honestly think that's a credible source about controversial chemicals in cigarettes? Honestly? That's about as credible as me posting a source from a site called [noparse]"www.ChemTrailsAreReal.com"[/noparse] in a debate about the government poisoning the public using chemicals in jet trails. So no, in summary, thread is not over.

[QUOTE=Gmod4ever;36309194]Okay, great. You have some links. However, neither of those are [b]credible[/b]. If you reread [b]my[/b] post, you will see that I said "I've yet to see a single [b]credible[/b] source" The first link is from [b]a cigarette manufacturer[/b], one who has [b]no legal obligation to reveal everything in their products[/b]. Without such legal obligation, what makes you really think they would post all the carcinogens and toxins that may or may not be present in their product? And the second link... I mean, come on, man. Honestly? [url][b]quitsmoking[/b].about.com[/url]? Do you honestly think that's a credible source about controversial chemicals in cigarettes? Honestly? That's about as credible as me posting a source from a site called [noparse]"www.ChemTrailsAreReal.com"[/noparse] in a debate about the government poisoning the public using chemicals in jet trails. So no, in summary, thread is not over.[/QUOTE] Do you agree or disagree that cigarettes are bad for you? Also, do you smoke?

[QUOTE=BigOwl;36309726]Do you agree or disagree that cigarettes are bad for you? Also, do you smoke?[/QUOTE] what kind of question is that may as well ask him what his shoe size is he's getting at citation, not recreational use of tobacco

[QUOTE=Ownederd;36309879]what kind of question is that may as well ask him what his shoe size is he's getting at citation, not recreational use of tobacco[/QUOTE] Then he's right and I give up. You are the overlord of supreme being right on the internet. Let this thread die, you've accomplished nothing.

[QUOTE=BigOwl;36309726]Do you agree or disagree that cigarettes are bad for you? Also, do you smoke?[/QUOTE] I personally believe that cigarettes are most probably pumped full of chemicals that are counterproductive toward health, and absolutely hate cigarettes - meaning no, I do not smoke. However, I do not have any sources to back up my belief that cigarettes are pumped full of toxins. Ergo, I do not go and state it like it is a fact - it is merely a belief I possess. [editline]13th June 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Ownederd;36309879]what kind of question is that may as well ask him what his shoe size is he's getting at citation, not recreational use of tobacco[/QUOTE] I wear 9.5's (American male sizes; no idea how that translates to other countries or sizes). I have small hands and feet.

[QUOTE=BigOwl;36310001]Then he's right and I give up. You are the overlord of supreme being right on the internet. Let this thread die, you've accomplished nothing.[/QUOTE] l o l