clearly the zombie supporters were for vermin supreme, who suggested the brilliant idea of zombie powered turbines to create energy for the nation and to create a better economy for the zombies in the international community
No, no, no, man
turns out
they were alive
BUT THEN THEY MADE THEM LOSE VOTES
BY MAKING UPLINK HACKERS CHANGE THEIR STATUSES TO DEAD
YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND MAN
[B]THE UPLINK HACKERS[/B]
[B][I][U]THEY'RE COMING[/U][/I][/B]
[QUOTE=Medevilae;34356905]953 isn't very many in the grand scheme of things. It's twice what Michele Bachmann had, though.[/QUOTE]
Still one of the most reprehensible crimes that can be committed in a nation that professes to be a democratic republic. Even if the candidate wasn't behind it, I bet those were Republican votes.
Who the hell thought it was a good idea to let people vote without any kind of identification?
[QUOTE=Sgt. Lulz;34356882]No, no, no, man
turns out
they were alive
BUT THEN THEY MADE THEM LOSE VOTES
BY MAKING UPLINK HACKERS CHANGE THEIR STATUSES TO DEAD
YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND MAN
[B]THE UPLINK HACKERS[/B]
[B][I][U]THEY'RE COMING[/U][/I][/B][/QUOTE]
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5636656/uplink_front.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=archangel125;34357295]Still one of the most reprehensible crimes that can be committed in a nation that professes to be a democratic republic. Even if the candidate wasn't behind it, I bet those were Republican votes.[/QUOTE]
It was a Republican primary, of course they were Republican votes
Interesting:
[quote=Aexia from Reddit]More likely than not, 75% of these "dead voters" will turn out to be cases of mistaken identity. Meaning, living voters with the same name as people who have recently died. Father/son pairs are the usual explanation.
Probably 90% remainder will likely be due to the legitimate voter on either side of them in the poll book signing the wrong line. In that case, the dead person didn't actually vote.
Then, there'll be a few cases of people who cast an absentee ballot and then died afterwards. Don't know what the law is in SC if it still counts.
Ultimately, there might be less than half a dozen cases where a widow cast a ballot for a recently deceased spouse.
Nonetheless, we'll keep hearing about the "hundreds of dead people" that voted in the SC primary for years and years and how that justifies onerous voter id laws that'll prevent hundreds of thousands of legitimate voters from exercising their constitutional right.
Republicans tend to do a shoddy job with voter data because they know the first big scary number is what will stick with voters and the press. A half-way decent matching job would've cut the number of "fraud" cases by 90%.[/quote]
vermin supreme was right. we need to prepare for zombies
or... zombie president?
[QUOTE=Bassplaya7;34357430]It was a Republican primary, of course they were Republican votes[/QUOTE]
Wait, shit. Yeah, I thought it was a State thing.
[QUOTE=Bassplaya7;34357430]It was a Republican primary, of course they were Republican votes[/QUOTE]
Not necessarily, South Carolina is an open primary state which means non Republicans can vote in the primaries.
[QUOTE=SomeRandomGuy16;34353367]I would not put voter fraud past Newt Gingrich, I'd say it's likely he orchestrated this[/QUOTE]
He has too much to lose.
[editline]23rd January 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=archangel125;34357295]Still one of the most reprehensible crimes that can be committed in a nation that professes to be a democratic republic. Even if the candidate wasn't behind it, I bet those were Republican votes.[/QUOTE]
Well it was a Republican primary, so one would assume that.
Of course, you weren't thinking and just entered knee-jerk blame-Republicans-for-everything mode.
What the hell..... Seriously, how could 953 voters be dead?
I believe this is some scam to support Ron Paul or Gingrich.
[QUOTE=calebc789;34358639]What the hell..... Seriously, how could 953 voters be dead?
I believe this is some scam to support Ron Paul or Gingrich.[/QUOTE]
Quite the opposite, Ron Paul is who they want to keep out.
If only we had to show our IDs while voting.
What would happen if they voted, then died?
[QUOTE=Swagger420;34352624]I guess you could say the tally was [B]dead wrong[/B]
[IMG]http://www.bangstyle.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/austin-powers-4-Jisele-Bundchen.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
old gold
[QUOTE=person11;34353493]I am pretty sure its just shenanigans. Plus, Gingrich won by a lot more than 1000 votes.[/QUOTE]
That's how many were dead. It's not unlikely that those were the only shenanigans.
Can we bring back Austin Powers for a week? :(
[QUOTE=Falstad007;34353673]Requiring voter I.D.s is strill wrong though, rite guies?[/QUOTE]
Yes, if you had required voter id those 900 dead wouldn't have voted, but niether would 1000 legitimate poor voters.
[QUOTE=Jawalt;34360358]Yes, if you had required voter id those 900 dead wouldn't have voted, but niether would 1000 legitimate poor voters.[/QUOTE]
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Marion_County_Election_Board]The Supreme Court disagree.[/url]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
