[QUOTE=BigWhitey;49705134]Sanders will win Vermont too. It's his most-popular state.[/QUOTE]
That's what I was thinking too, that's kind of his home turf as well
I honestly don't expect landslides but I expect it to be super close or slight 20% difference, but I also expect the same when it comes to Clinton winning
afaik in VT, Bernie leads Hillary 60-40 in polls. Not as much as you'd think, not even as much as NH
as vermont resident however, I find it hard for him to lose since every single vehicle has a bernie sticker. I have not seen one piece of hillary campaign stuff here. His face is even spray-painted on things
[QUOTE=thelurker1234;49705052]Shit even Clinton news network reports a huge lead, that's pretty hilarious.[/QUOTE]
Hilary wins by a miniscule amount: "A win is a win"
Hilary Loses by a massive amount: "Getting this much in this state is a win anyway, lets call it a tie"
[QUOTE=Glitchman;49705150]afaik in VT, Bernie leads Hillary 60-40 in polls. Not as much as you'd think, not even as much as NH
as vermont resident however, I find it hard for him to lose since every single vehicle has a bernie sticker. I have not seen one piece of hillary campaign stuff here. His face is even spray-painted on things[/QUOTE]
could just be your area unless you cross into other areas/counties regularly and see the same thing
I just don't believe that the Democratic primaries will see any landslides, just close ties and slight wins. I think the same for GOP because it's a three way race with Trump, Rubio and Cruz
[editline]10th February 2016[/editline]
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;49705191]Hilary wins by a miniscule amount: "A win is a win"
Hilary Loses by a massive amount: "Getting this much in this state is a win anyway, lets call it a tie"[/QUOTE]
or CNN says "x is treating Clinton v bad :(((((" like that one headline in Iowa primaries when CNN made some dumb melodramatic story about how they're being not too nice at her
[QUOTE=Glitchman;49705150]afaik in VT, Bernie leads Hillary 60-40 in polls. Not as much as you'd think, not even as much as NH
as vermont resident however, I find it hard for him to lose since every single vehicle has a bernie sticker. I have not seen one piece of hillary campaign stuff here. His face is even spray-painted on things[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I live across the lake and I find it hard to believe he won't do well in vermont from everything i'm hearing.
[QUOTE=Cutthecrap;49702216][IMG]https://facepunch.com/image.php?u=201103&dateline=1393896891[/IMG]
[B]DULCE ET DECORUM EST PRO BERNIE MORI!
[/B]
EDIT: Sorry, wasn't roman enough.
There we go[/QUOTE]
that means "Sweet and of graces is the rules for Bernie"
[editline]9th February 2016[/editline]
If you mean to say "Sweet and graceful will be the reign of Bernie," it's more like "Dulcis et pulchrum erit regnum Berni"
[QUOTE=mcgrath618;49705410]that means "Sweet and of graces is the rules for Bernie"
[editline]9th February 2016[/editline]
If you mean to say "Sweet and graceful will be the reign of Bernie," it's more like "Dulcis et pulchrum erit regnum Berni"[/QUOTE]
Romanes Eunt Domus
Trump confirmed to win, Ruboto doesn't stand a chance.
Sanders was pretty much guaranteed Iowa but still lost it, he lost any momentum he had. I'm curious to see what happens with the Democrats.
[QUOTE=Fat White Lump;49705769]Trump confirmed to win, Ruboto doesn't stand a chance.
Sanders was pretty much guaranteed Iowa but still lost it, [B]he lost any momentum he had[/B]. I'm curious to see what happens with the Democrats.[/QUOTE]
no he didn't, I might as well say Trump lost any momentum when he lost Iowa and you'd be pissed off
the momentum wasn't lost, it only got stronger
[QUOTE=fruxodaily;49705802]no he didn't, I might as well say Trump lost any momentum when he lost Iowa and you'd be pissed off
the momentum wasn't lost, it only got stronger[/QUOTE]
Nah, I would just say you're wrong. Trump has a good grip on more than five states. Bernie already lost in one of his five.
[QUOTE=Fat White Lump;49705769]Sanders was pretty much guaranteed Iowa but still lost it, he lost any momentum he had. I'm curious to see what happens with the Democrats.[/QUOTE]
What? The polls going into Iowa were at best a wash with most favoring Hillary.
[QUOTE=Fat White Lump;49705769]Trump confirmed to win, Ruboto doesn't stand a chance.
Sanders was pretty much guaranteed Iowa but still lost it, he lost any momentum he had. I'm curious to see what happens with the Democrats.[/QUOTE]
Bernie was never projected to win Iowa, it was only assumed he would need to do well because Iowa has a ton of white liberals. May I have some of what you're smoking please?
[QUOTE=Durandal;49705881]Bernie was never projected to win Iowa, it was only assumed he would need to do well because Iowa has a ton of white liberals. May I have some of what you're smoking please?[/QUOTE]
Yeah he was. He's also supposed to win Nevada, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Vermont. Hillary pretty much has every other state's Democrats. It's a shame too, Bernie would be much easier for Trump to beat.
[QUOTE=Fat White Lump;49705913]Yeah he was. He's also supposed to win Nevada, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Vermont. Hillary pretty much has every other state's Democrats. It's a shame too, Bernie would be much easier for Trump to beat.[/QUOTE]
lol
[QUOTE=Fat White Lump;49705769]Trump confirmed to win, Ruboto doesn't stand a chance.
Sanders was pretty much guaranteed Iowa but still lost it, he lost any momentum he had. I'm curious to see what happens with the Democrats.[/QUOTE]
I know that, for myself, I though Sanders had no chance until I saw how close he was in Iowa. While at the same time, all the Republicans I talked to said Iowa was the beginning of the end of Trump, in your defense though, these people were not big Trump fans to begin with.
[QUOTE=BuffaloBill;49704721]What the hell kind of rose-tinted glasses are they using if they call this a 'virtual tie'.[/QUOTE]
Beer Goggles.
[QUOTE=splenda;49705983]I know that, for myself, I though Sanders had no chance until I saw how close he was in Iowa. While at the same time, all the Republicans I talked to said Iowa was the beginning of the end of Trump, in your defense though, these people were not big Trump fans to begin with.[/QUOTE]
Cruz was guaranteed Iowa, I never expected Trump to actually win. He might have though had Cruz not sent those letters lying about Carson dropping out. People say that Trump's campaign is over with everything he does but he just keeps doing better.
Which is amazing because he spews vitriol like a septic pump.
[QUOTE=Fat White Lump;49706011]Cruz was guaranteed Iowa, I never expected Trump to actually win. He might have though had Cruz not sent those letters lying about Carson dropping out. People say that Trump's campaign is over with everything he does but he just keeps doing better.[/QUOTE]
I feel like the biggest thing from Trump was his second place speech right after Iowa. Like his campaign was built around "I'm number one" so it was his first chance to be humble. I feel like he pulled it off really well, so you are probably right.
[QUOTE=splenda;49706042]I feel like the biggest thing from Trump was his second place speech right after Iowa. Like his campaign was built around "I'm number one" so it was his first chance to be humble. I feel like he pulled it off really well, so you are probably right.[/QUOTE]
Yeah he handled it well, I was surprised he even gave a speech.
[QUOTE=Fat White Lump;49705913]Yeah he was. He's also supposed to win Nevada, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Vermont. Hillary pretty much has every other state's Democrats. It's a shame too, Bernie would be much easier for Trump to beat.[/QUOTE]
What color is the sky in your world
[QUOTE=Fat White Lump;49705913]Yeah he was. He's also supposed to win Nevada, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Vermont. Hillary pretty much has every other state's Democrats. It's a shame too, Bernie would be much easier for Trump to beat.[/QUOTE]
hahahaha
Oh
You're not joking
You legitimately support Trump...
I wonder what kind of polling you would have to look at, or where you would look for it, to get that kind of thought.
[QUOTE=Atlascore;49706364]Trump is actually ahead in both South Carolina and Nevada.
(Scroll down for poll numbers)
[url]http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/nevada-republican/[/url]
[url]http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/south-carolina-republican/[/url][/QUOTE]
This doesn't fit what point I was making.
Of course trump has a big chanse at winning the republican primary.
But the idea that trump can easily beat Sanders in the general election when polls putting sanders against trump have sanders winning (clinton too, but not by as much as sanders)
[QUOTE=Fat White Lump;49705913]Yeah he was. He's also supposed to win Nevada, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Vermont. Hillary pretty much has every other state's Democrats. It's a shame too, Bernie would be much easier for Trump to beat.[/QUOTE]
yeah nah, trump is a right wing populist wet dream (like yourself), he's not as radical as Cruz but fuck if he won the GOP would pop itself in the head, Sanders would defeat Trump pretty easily seeing as Trump's septic reputation would make people either choose sanders or stay at home or vote 3rd party
[editline]10th February 2016[/editline]
++ polls showed that if it came down to a Trump v Sanders that Sanders is the most electable president and he would win by a great majority
However we can both agree that a debate between the two would be very entertaining
I'd say Hillary would be easier for Trump to beat since some people might vote against her out of spite.
[QUOTE=Fat White Lump;49705913]Yeah he was. He's also supposed to win Nevada, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Vermont. Hillary pretty much has every other state's Democrats. It's a shame too, Bernie would be much easier for Trump to beat.[/QUOTE]
Actually, compared to the polling leading up to Iowa, Sanders did very well. His issue going forward is exposure to his policies and the momentum from doing far better than anyone thought in Iowa should provide that.
Just because polls right now don't show Bernie winning doesn't mean he won't. Look at how much they've changed since he first entered the race as an outsider nobody had ever heard of. Remember that most people don't know the candidates inside out, and they don't necessarily support the candidate that they should support demographically.
also lol
Let's go Trump hope you win by a land slide.
[QUOTE=JohnFisher89;49706471]Let's go Trump hope you win by a land slide.[/QUOTE]
Hope he falls in a landslide.
It amazes me how everyone hates Trump. It's a bandwagon.
Trump is the best possible GOP candidate. He's challenging the establishment, he could never defeat the Democrats in an election, his policy outside of immigration is quite moderate, and his more radical policy would be blocked by congress even if he did become President. Democrats should love Trump.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.